Le Reve at Wynn Las Vegas

How to Turn Paying Customers into Pirates

I want to use my registered copy of Babylon 7 Pro, including the additional professional dictionaries “Oxford Dictionary and Thesaurus”, “Merriam-Webster's Collegiate® Dictionary and Thesaurus” and “Britannica Encyclopedia” on my new Dell laptop with MS Vista (and soon on Windows 7). This is not much to ask for you would think. Hey, I bought this stuff directly from the author of the software and paid good money for it.

Babylon_logo_ani I entered all license keys yesterday and everything was fine. Today all keys are gone and except for one that unlocks one of the three additional dictionaries, none is working anymore. When I entered the codes again, I received the message that I must have made a typo or something. I didn’t make a typo, thanks but no thanks.

I went to their web site at Babylon.com I used the online form to retrieve license keys that they have created for this purpose I guess, enter the captcha code and my email address and submit the form. The form neither returned an error nor acknowledged the input telling me that new and valid license keys will be send to me again. Since I also did not get an email yet, I assume that it did not work as it was intended (hint: this implies another suggestion for the folks at Babylon).

This is not the first time that I had to contact them about this. I lost count of how many different license keys I got from them for the same stuff over the past 7 plus years since I am a paying PRO user of the software*

Their paranoia about software piracy disgusts me. I should get a pirated version of your software instead, because that one is at least working.

*I am a user of the Babylon software since the mid 1990s. It used to be free for several years, when it was still in beta and I was using a cracked version when they first started to charge money for their software, without giving long time beta users a break to make the legitimate switch to the pro version. Up until version 4 they also had an Ad Ware supported version as an option, which was also free. I still have the setup files for their old version 3.2, 4.0, 5.0, 6, 7 and 7.5.2.10. The latter one is the version that I installed yesterday.

I always supported them and recommended the software sincerely to friends and other people. I renewed my support once more, when I paid the full price for their PRO version in 2002 and bought upgrades and additional professional dictionaries over the years since. Now I won't buy another upgrade to version 8 anymore, because I had have it with with their crap.

I demanded (No, I did not ask nicely this time) that they are going to send me working license keys or better ONE license key for Babylon 7 Pro and the 3 pro dictionaries, which I paid them money for.

This issue with their license keys and the way that they let legitimate customers jump through hoops before they will be able to use the software does not help to win customer loyalty nor sympathy. Users don't have to put up with this, if they get the pirated version of the software. That means legitimate users get penalized for actually paying them money for a license over the ones who download the free pirated and cracked (fixed) one.

Spartan_Pirate_Logo_by_TheQuezotThink about it. Which version would you prefer?

The crack is an improvement of the software, a bug fix. This isn’t the first time where this is the case. As a matter of fact, many crackers get started by removing faulty copy protections from software they legitimate purchased licenses for, but were unable to use it as they intended for one reason or another, be it a compatibility issue or a use of the software in a different way than the developer originally intended.

Their paranoia does not help them to get more users to pay for their software. I would bet that the opposite is the case. At least they are not going to win any points with their paying customer base and decrease the likelihood that those existing users will recommend the software to friends and colleagues, not to mention becoming evangelists of it, as I used to be for them once. 

It’s a great translation tool that can be extended with additional custom made dictionaries that are free and were created by other Babylon users over the years. You can enable dictionaries to pull results from online or download them and install locally on your machine that you are able to use them, even if you are not connected to the Internet. The main problem that this software has is its copy protection. There is only one other thing, which does not really have to do with the main Babylon software itself, but with something else that they shovel down the throats of their customers without asking them, if they want to get it shoveled or not …

Part 2: The Babylon Toolbar Issue

After I installed Babylon Pro V7.X my Internet Explorer start pages suddenly looked like this.

babylon-ie-homepage

Who do think they think they are that they can install their stupid browser toolbar for Internet Explorer and change my home page to their own web site at “http://search.babylon.com/home”? All that without asking for my permission of course.

They did not ask for my permission during the install of Babylon (Version 7.x, sorry, but I didn't buy a license for V8 so I don't know, if they still do it or not). I also looked at the configuration screens for the software and did not see the option to disable your toolbar and/or change my default home page back to what it was. I have not checked yet, but I am sure that they also changed my default search provider to Babylon.

This is not only arrogant and intrusive, but also unethical. They should at least have the decency to provide an easy way to remove it. Include the uninstall option in a “Babylon” folder in the start menu  for example. There they only added a shortcut to  the Babylon executable, without adding a separate folder. I’d rather have them add a folder that includes the shortcut to start Babylon, Uninstall Babylon, Uninstall the Toolbar and maybe some other useful shortcuts as well, for example shortcuts to important sections of their web site; a link to the registration/purchase form, to the license recovery form, to their support page or to their directory of dictionaries etc.

I thought at first that I have to go into the system registry manually to remove their Conduit Toolbar myself and by hand, because I didn't see it in the control panel when I was looking for it there. When I found the registry entry for it (I used the very useful and FREE tool Autoruns by Mark Russinovich and Bryce Cogswell from SysInternals). There I noticed that they installed the toolbar into a separate folder below “Program Files” (or “Program Files (x86)” in MS Vista 64bit) titled "myBabylon_English" and not to a sub folder below their main program folder “Babylon". They also labeled it "MyBabylon Toolbar" in the add/remove programs section of the control panel (“Programs and Features” in Vista). Far away from the entry for the Babylon software at least on my computer which has hundreds of entries in that list.

They should have called it "Babylon Toolbar" that it appears below "Babylon" in the control panel and put the files in a sub folder below "Babylon" in the Program Files folder where it belongs! This is not unreasonable to ask, isn’t it?  Because of their blatant behavior, I am not even considering to use their toolbar and won't even add “http://search.babylon.com/home” to my “Custom Search Providers”.

In addition to the proper labeling and location for the program files, they should extend their installation routine. During the Install of Babylon, they should include in a SEPARATE step the follow options:

[x] Install Babylon Browser Toolbar for MS Internet Explorer?
[x] Change default MS Internet Explorer Homepage to Babylon Web Search (powered by Google)
[x] Add Babylon Search to Custom Search Providers for Internet Explorer & Mozilla Firefox

(o) Yes, I accept the terms of condition of Babylon
( ) No, I don't accept the terms of condition of Babylon.
Don't install any of the items above.


Then also add a screen to the Babylon configuration settings to change those settings again.

To set the defaults options to ON during the setup wouldn't be too nice either, but they would give users at least a chance to say explicitly NO, if they want to. If they really want to do it the nice and clean (in other words, the right way), then they would set the default options to OFF and provide some convincing arguments to the user why he should turn them ON.

p.s. Now I removed the freaking toolbar via the control panel and guess what, it requires me to reboot my computer; great! That was not necessary to install it without my knowledge in the first place.

Unbelievable!


Carsten aka Roy/SAC


Updates. September 28, 2009


I have not heard back from Babylon regarding my Customer Support request. I sent another message via their web form today. There I noticed something. I looked at my spam folder and got 3 messages there that coincide with the date and time when I used the contact form at the Babylon.com web site.


The messages looked like this. I “x’ed out” my email address (because of spammers):


The original message was received at Mon, 28 Sep 2009 07:22:22 GMT
from localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]
----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -----
<help@babylon.com>
(reason: 554 Service unavailable; Client host [213.198.65.7] blocked
using zen.spamhaus.org; http://www.spamhaus.org/query/bl?ip=213.198.65.7)
----- Transcript of session follows -----
... while talking to ren.babylon.com.:
>>> DATA
<<< 554 Service unavailable; Client host [213.198.65.7] blocked using
zen.spamhaus.org; http://www.spamhaus.org/query/bl?ip=213.198.65.7
554 5.0.0 Service unavailable
<<< 554 Error: no valid recipients
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Return-Path: <cxxxxxx@cxxxxxxxxx.com>
Received: from www.babylon.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
by ;; connection timed out; no servers could be reached
(8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id n8S7MMbr004826
for <help@babylon.com>; Mon, 28 Sep 2009 07:22:22 GMT
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 07:22:22 +0000
To: help@babylon.com
From: cxxxxxx@cxxxxxxxxx.com
Reply-to: "Babylon Ltd." <info@babylon.com>, cxxxxxxx@Cxxxxxxxx.com
Subject: Other
Message-ID: <f10f88d2f31ad510c062196a9d750882@www.babylon.com>
X-Priority: 3
X-Mailer: PHPMailer 5.0.2 (phpmailer.codeworxtech.com)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="b1_f10f88d2f31ad510c062196a9d750882

So from what it seems, my contact emails never reached them. Also not my feedback email.

I also tried the License Retrieval form on their site again, without success. This time I notice a message appear, which I did not see last time. But that message also points to a bug with that form as well, or am I too stupid to enter a captcha code?! See for yourself and tell me, if I entered the wrong code or not.

babylon license retieval form screenshot 09282009

I found an old support email from where they responded to my emails a few years ago and which also worked to contact them. I sent a copy of my form message to that email address as well. It did not bounce or generated some other error so far, so keep your fingers crossed. Man, this is just unbelievable.

I also sent an email to the addresses: press@babylon.com, bizdev@babylon.com and marketing@babylon.com, which I found on their web site. Basically a request to forward the message to somebody who is responsible for all this stuff and a link to this blog post. Lets see if that does something. Maybe the company is out of business and they forgot to shut down the web site yet. Who knows. Anything could be possible.

I will update this post again, once I got some news to report on this.

Updates October 5, 2009



  • I received an Email from the PR and Content Manager at Babylon on September 29, 2009 telling me that my email was forwarded to support and that I should hear from them within 48 hours. She also asked me for my phone number, which I provided in my reply.
  • I received an Email from Babylon Support on September 30, 2009. Responded to it with all the details that I submit via support contact form the week before on October 1, 2009. The message read like this:


    Thank you for taking the time to write us.

    I tried to reach you today but there was no answer.

    As I said on the message that I left you will be happy to assist you with any technical problems you have encountered, but I will need more specific details.

    Assuming you have Babylon installed and running on your computer, please be more specific and explain exactly what happens when you try to use or install Babylon. Do you get any error messages? If so - what are they?

    Thank you for your cooperation.

    Support was obviously not taking the time to read this post where I linked to from my email, nor did they find my contact attempts via their web contact form on September 23 and 28, 2009 (obviously).
    I provided my phone number. The contact attempt he refers to must be have been the call from a “private caller” with blocked caller ID that I received that day, but not responded to.
    Bad enough, but worse is this: No response to my direct email that I replied with to this day.

  • I received another email from a different support email account and person at Babylon.com on October 3, 2009, asking virtually the same as the other support person in the email from September 30, 2009.
  • I responded on October 4, 2009 with another copy of my email to the first support rep and also CC’ed that other rep in my response.
  • Sent a second email to both support email accounts with my phone number to encourage them to call me again. Based on the times when they sent the emails to me, there is a good chance that they received my email today, before they left the office in Israel (where Babylon is located).
  • The trial license to what the software switched to by itself on September 23, 2009, one day after I installed the software and applied my licenses to successfully expired by now also = The software does not run at all at this time anymore.

Update October 6, 2009


There was actually an email from Babylon support that Microsoft flagged a possible Phishing scam and that I thus just saw today, when I checked that folder. The email was sent to me on October 4, 2009 and contained instructions to reinstall the software and new license keys that worked. Again a set of multiple user name and key pairs to unlock all dictionaries and Babylon itself. They obviously check license codes by having the application connect their servers when users are connected to the Internet (hello Privacy.. Microsoft would have been tarred and feathered for this), but okay they do that, fine, why isn’t it possible then to just consolidate all my licenses into a single key and name that unlocks all of what I have licenses for at once?


Why so complicated, if it could be done easy?


I responded back to all support emails/reps that contacted me, to let them know that things are fine again (until next time) that they are not continue to try to fix something that isn’t broken anymore. The left hand does obviously not know what the right hand is doing, so I thought that I will help a little bit with that communication and coordination ;).


Until next year (I hope not, but I won’t be too optimistic)!

Labels: , ,

Fonts Collections: Over 31,000 Fonts (TTF, OTF, FON, AFM, PFB & PFM)

Yes, the title was not a typo, over 31K fonts for Windows XP, Vista, NT etc. There are multiple collections.

There are several collections of TrueType Fonts (*.TTF), which make up the by far largest chunk of the whole thing, plus separate collections for font formats like Open Type Font (*.OTF), Fixed Size Bitmap Fonts (*.FON), Adobe Font Metrics Files (*.AFM) and Adobe Fonts (*.PFM + *.PFB).

All in all over 1 Gigabyte (compressed) of Fonts, available for download at my Mediafire.com file share.

31KFontsCollection

Adobe Fonts Collection

4,000+ Adobe Fonts in PFx Format in font file pairs of: *.PFB Files (Type 1 PostScript Fonts) and *.PFM Files (Adobe Printer Outline Metrics Files)

PFM Files contain font metric information used by applications for laying out lines of text in a document. They also specify the Windows font menu name, kerning pair data, and a variety of other font-level information.

PFB is the Adobe Type Manager Type 1 PostScript font file format.

Adobe® Type Manager® (ATM) is a system software component that automatically generates high-quality screen font bitmaps from the PostScript® outlines in Type 1 or OpenType® format. With ATM, you can scale your fonts without the characters appearing jagged, and you can also enable "font smoothing," which further improves the appearance of your fonts onscreen by using your computer monitor's color palette to intelligently improve the rendering of characters. ATM Light also allows you to print PostScript fonts on non PostScript printers, and can be used to create custom instances of multiple master fonts.

Font Collection Download Link(s):

  1. ROY-PFxFntCol1.ZIP (98 MB)
  2. ROY-PFxFntCol2.ZIP (79 MB)

Adobe Font Metrics Files Collection

1,000+ Adobe Font Metrics Files in file pairs of: *.AFM (Adobe Font Metrics Files) and *.INF (Information Files)

AFM is Adobe's ASCII-based file format used for storing font metric data as human-readable data. AFM is the standard Adobe font file format.

The AFM format is also known as the Adobe Multiple Font Metrics (AMFM) and Adobe Composite Font Metrics (ACFM) file formats. In fact, AFM, AMFM, and ACFM are actually three variations of the same format. AFM files contain base or composite font information. One AFM file is used per master design of a font. AMFM files store control and global font information for a group of AFM files. And ACFM files contain the global metrics of the composite font program. AFM Specifications

Font Collection Download Link(s):

  1. ROY-AFMFntCol.ZIP (4.7 MB)

Bitmap Fonts Collection

Just a small collection of 87 Fixed Size Bitmap Fonts in the standard *.FON format/extension.

Bitmap font libraries, which were originally developed for the old 16 bit Microsoft Windows V3.x, but are still used in the latest Windows 32 bit version.

Font Collection Download Link(s):

  1. Roy-FONFntCol.ZIP (663 KB)

OpenType Fonts Collection

2,799 Fonts in OTF Format (OpenType Font Format)

OpenType fonts from Adobe is a cross-platform font file format developed by Adobe and Microsoft based on Unicode. OpenType fonts from Adobe is an extension of the TrueType SFNT format that supports PostScript font data and new typographic features. Filenames of OpenType fonts from Adobe containing TrueType data have a .ttf. or .ttc extension, while filenames of PostScript based OpenType fonts from Adobe have an .otf extension.

Font Collection Download Link(s):

  1. ROY-OTFFntCol1.ZIP 
  2. ROY-OTFFntCol2.ZIP 
  3. ROY-OTFFntCol3.ZIP 
  4. ROY-OTFFntCol4.ZIP

Note: Files were updated and the old links became invalid. Check this folder share to get the most recent files of this collection. You can also find other collections there that might be of interest to you.

TrueType Fonts Collections

Unlike a Type 1 font, a TrueType font consists of only one font file, a TrueType Font (TTF) file, used for both display and printing. TrueType files are installed in the operating system's Fonts Control Panel or Fonts folder. TrueType fonts are designed to display and print clearly at any point size.

PCL printer drivers send TrueType font information directly to the printer. Some PCL printer drivers enable you to send TrueType fonts to the printer as bitmapped images instead. See your printer driver documentation for instructions.

Bay Animation TrueType Fonts Collection

2,322 Fonts in the standard TTF (TrueType Font) Format. Bay Animation Fonts Collection. The fonts in this collection are only rough sorted by alphabet. Sorry.

Font Collection Download Link(s):

  1. ROY-BayAnimTTFFntCol.ZIP (74 MB)

Categorized TrueType Fonts Collection

5,567 TrueType Fonts (*.TTF) / Categorized (or better "somewhat sorted" by some categories like:

  • Alte Schriften (Old Fonts)
  • Arabic Fonts
  • Blood & Horror Fun Fonts
  • Comic/Cartoon Fonts
  • Curly Fonts
  • Foreign Look Fonts
  • Fun Fonts
  • Grafiti Fonts
  • Halloween Fun Fonts
  • Hebrew Fonts
  • Mono Space Fonts
  • Ornaments/Decorative Fonts
  • Seasons and Festive Greetings Fonts
  • Space Age Fonts
  • Sports Fonts
  • Vintage/Nostalgic Paper Fonts
  • Xmas Fun Fonts

... and other categories

Font Collection Download Link(s):

  1. ROY-CatTTFFntCol1.ZIP (98 MB)
  2. ROY-CatTTFFntCol2.ZIP (98 MB)
  3. ROY-CatTTFFntCol3.ZIP (39 MB)

SchriftenFonts TrueType Fonts Collection

5,609 Fonts in the standard *.TTF (TrueType Font) Format. "SchriftenFonts" Collection, only sorted alphabetically

Font Collection Download Link(s):

  1. ROY-SchriftenTTFFntCol1.ZIP (98 MB)
  2. ROY-SchriftenTTFFntCol2.ZIP (26 MB)

Big TrueType Fonts Collection

9,640 Fonts in the standard TTF (TrueType Font) Format. Unsorted, BIG Collection

Font Collection Download Link(s):

  1. ROY-BigTTFFntCol1.ZIP (98 MB)
  2. ROY-BigTTFFntCol2.ZIP (98 MB)
  3. ROY-BigTTFFntCol3.ZIP (98 MB)
  4. ROY-BigTTFFntCol4.ZIP (26 MB)

Also don’t forget my previously released:

Scene Pixel-Art Fonts Collection Volume 1.0

A collection of over 600 font sets from demos, intros, cracktros, demo makers and other sources from the Atari ST, Amiga and PC. The collection is 37 MB in size and can be downloaded from my MediaFire.com account as well.

Download the Scene Fonts Collection here:  roysac-scenefontscollectionvol1.zip

I hope you will enjoy those collection and put them to good use.

p.s. Here is the link to the Mediafire.com folder share with all my previous collections releases.

Cheers!

Carsten aka Roy/SAC

Labels: , ,

Michael Dell Gone? Dell Starts to Suck Now too!

delllogo Michael Dell, the entrepreneur who founded the computer retailer "Dell" and built it into a multi-billion dollars business must be gone from Dell. Once a poster child for customer centric marketing, web site performance enhancement making it better converting and more user friendly at the same time.

Dell computers might not be the best computers on the planet in regards to their quality, but the company always made up for it via their customer support and service.

It seems that the drive to improve on things stops after an order was placed and hopefully starts over after the computer was shipped to the customer. That is what I hope, because my experiences after I placed my order for a brand new Dell Studio XPS 16 Notebook on August 11, 2009 (17 days ago) things started to become really bad.

Michael_Dell_Founder_of_Dell_Computers Flashback

I had serious issues with my computers to say it mildly. A series of hardware failures combined with the support that I paid for but never got, because the company who purchased the business from the retailer where I bought my previous notebook went out of business, 2 weeks before my hardware problems started. After all this misfortune I finally decided to buy another Dell. I purchased multiple Dell computers in the past and was overall happy with them and the service provided, if I had a problem with the machine.

I thought that my string of bad luck had an end, when I saw that there is a great promotion available for the Dell notebook that I was interested in. 20% off the entire order. Not bad. So I started to build my computer on the Dell web site. When I was done, I decided to take advantage of the option to buy the machine on credit without paying interests for a full year. I started the qualification process, but the process started to hang. I waited 10 or so minutes and then picked up the phone to call the Dell sales department.

They were able to access my shopping cart and we continued from there.  I got qualified for Dell Preferred program and a credit line that was much higher than what I needed. The sales rep was very helpful and I even made some adjustments to the machine configuration to improve on things a bit more. Especially the "CompleteCare" Warranty was important for me to make sure that things will be taken care of quickly, should I get an issue with the machine. I told the rep that I needed a computer quickly and even changed the shipping method for my order to Next Business Day for that reason.

The rep told me that the computer should be shipped within a few business days, which I was very happy about. When we were going over the entire order one last time, I noticed that the rep mentioned an estimated delivery date of September 11, 2009. I asked about it and said that this is not an acceptable date for me. I needed a new computer yesterday and not in one month. He said that this date is unrealistic and only to cover cases like unexpected hardware shortages. My order will be fine. I said that I will take his word for it.

Calling Customer Service

Well, a week and a half passed and the only thing that I got so far is the spare battery for the notebook.

I called customer services to inquire about the status of my order. There I got told that the machine is in high demand at the moment, which explains the delay. I said to the rep that I mentioned when I placed the order that it is urgent and that he can see that, if he looks at the delivery method. Normal shipping would have been free, but I paid $69 to get it as quickly as humanly possible.

I asked if there is a way that I could get a higher priority or expedited processing. I am of course willing to pay for this special treatment. He said, that Dell does not offer such an option, but that he will see what he can do to speed up the process. He didn't say how and also avoided to give a clear answer when I asked him that.

dellhelpdesk Another Call and More Bull

This Monday, August 24, 2009 I called again, but this time not being so nice anymore, because I felt being bullshitted and lied to. Not to mention that I am still in desperate need of a new computer. The computer is the tool that I need to make my living. My livelihood depends on it so to speak. A faulty or inadequate computer reduces to disables my ability to do my work properly, in the required quality and timely fashion. The rep could not help me at all and his manager was busy. I provided my phone number to get a call back the next day (it was already evening when I called on Monday).

I did get a call back on Tuesday, but the answers by the managers were the same and he repeated one sentence over and over again. "the estimated delivery date for this order is September 11, 2009. We do our best to deliver the machine before this date." Expediting the processing is impossible. Dell uses automated processed where no human can ever interfere with. My computer is in production, which makes any change to it impossible, including cancellations. I said, great, in productions means that they should have it ready to ship in a day or two, right? No, that is not the case, but it will be delivered on or before September 11, 2009. Aha, how long can things be in production at Dell; two or more weeks? How can I imagine this "being in productions"? Is there a box with all the parts that I ordered in a box with my name on it moving slowly a countless miles long assembly line that can take two weeks to process?

Man that must be the biggest plant on the planet. There must be Billions of Dollars worth of computer equipment moving around on those conveyor belts and they must be protected by a force field and self-shooting systems or something like this, because it is impossible for any human to access those, for example to pull up to the box with my name on it, load it onto a trolley, drive down a bit closer to the assembly area and load it back up onto the conveyor belts. It must be, because I offered to pay for the man's time and everything to just do that for me, but no money in the world is probably worth the grave risk for the workers life, if he would attempt the impossible and mess with the fully automated system that Dell created.

impossible_triangle Impossible is Relative

After a lot more screaming and yelling, it was suddenly possible to cancel the entire order. Well, almost entire, because I already got some parts. Something that was impossible 15 minutes earlier, due to the current status of the order, suddenly became possible. Interesting; I wondered what other impossible things would suddenly become possible, if I would keep pushing it. But I ran out of arguments and the ones like, maybe there won't be a customer to pay back the money for the computer, if they continue to delay the delivery of the tool that the customer needs to make a living. The only option left would have been to threaten the customer service rep and make him fear for his own life and/or the life of the members of his family. I didn't want to go that far though, although I might have punched him into the face, if that would have been possible over the phone line. :(

I could also not get an answer if any other Dell system would be faster to assemble and deliver. When I asked about the in-store option via Best-Buy for example, I learned that in case of Best-Buy, Dell would not take care of the Warranty. But in the case of Wal-Mart, but my Dell Preferred account would be worthless nor would I get the discount that I got with my order (and the coupon is not valid anymore too).

I first wanted to call Dell's sales department again, but then decided not to do so. I would not expect any help from their end and only more complications. Canceling the order would probably create more issues than I already got. Getting a new computer elsewhere within such short notice without paying too much for it or buying it from somebody who might not be in business anymore to fulfill his service and warranty obligations when I need it, seems not to be a promising alternative.

sistineGod Now it is in Gods Hands

Now I am stuck, waiting for that god damn machine and hope that all my yelling and calling did maybe trigger something behind the curtain at Dell that I will receive the notebook a bit sooner than expected. Everything else is in "Gods Hands" so to speak. I hope that there is no penalty for folks like me who are agnostics.

That Dell does not offer expedited processing, if a customer specifically asks for it and is willing to pay the price tag that comes with this special treatment is beyond my understanding. Moving a customer up in the queue, if he is willing to pay for it (I was willing to pay an extra $100 just for that) is not impossible to do, despite what the customer service rep was trying to make me believe. My order got stuck between orders by folks who are not in a hurry, like folks on vacation, who take things easy and let working folks who are in a hurry freely pass.  

Michael Dell? This is not rocket science and impossible to figure out. I am very disappointed about all this and only hope that the rest of Dell did not decay to the same low level, especially their technical support. I guess I am going to find out, on or before September 11, 2009... may be. :(

So long, a rather pissed off Carsten aka Roy/SAC

Labels: ,

Data Collection, Sorting, Archiving and Access #1 (Thesis)

babbling my thoughts and theories to nobody and everybody, or in other words, to anybody who might be interested in it :). 

Introduction 8994_nervous_schoolboy_wearing_cap_and_gown_while_holding_his_diploma

I collected myself a vast amount of data and have issues with using them effectively. The lack of ability to find and use specific data that I collected when I need them is a problem that bothers me and where I am constantly working on improving. This problem of mine is of course a problem that pretty much every person has to varying extend, so there are of course numerous options and tools that were created by others already, trying to solve my exact issues.

Considering the fact that virtually everybody has the same problem and that so many "solutions" and tools exist to solve your problem, it surprised me, that virtually of them that I check out failed to solve exactly those problems for ME. This bothered me a lot and got me thinking why this is the case. It didn't make sense at first glance, but after giving it more and more thoughts, I started to realize why most tools that are out there fail to solve the problems for me. 

This is great, but does not help me with actually solving my problem. So I kept thinking about the problem itself, to learn that while the problem appears to be the same for everybody, generally speaking, it is actually not, if you start looking at things a bit more closely. Those differences can make a tool useless for me, but work perfectly fine for somebody else. Many of the differences can also be compensated for, by tools, if the amount of data is relatively small or the available computer resources (hardware, almost every aspect of it) are abundant and can be wasted by getting you what you want, but in a very inefficient manner. 

Pretext

Once the amount of data becomes too large and/or the resources available for the processing too low to get away with wasting tons of them are suddenly not there anymore. At that point the tool(s) that you are using break and become unable to solve your problem. In order to find or create (or inspire somebody else to create) a tool that is truly capable of solving the same problem with its subtle (but eventually significant) differences, for all or at least for most people, we must determine the basic elements and causes of the problems, the goals that need to be accomplished and their reason. 

Then we can think about ways that allow us to solve all those different problems in an efficient way to accomplish the set goals satisfactory.A one-fits-all approach does obviously not work.To accomplish what we want, the tool has to be able to adjust (or be adjusted by the user) to cope with the varying problems and changing facts, such as amount and diversity of data. 

I started with thinking about the root of the problem; the core and heart. I also tried to determine constants, the things that are the same for everybody, because deep inside there is always something that is shared across all the different scenarios that are possible due to the large number of things that can be different and the exponentially increasing number of possible combinations that result from it. 

Thesis

Underlying Context (A Theory)

People collect data throughout their entire life. I use the word "DATA", because information is not brought enough in my opinion. Most DATA collected by human beings are information of some sort. Information are per my own definition data that are classified and structured, viewed from the perspective of each individual human separately. I will use the phrase "Classification and Structure" repeatedly in this document and refer to it as C&S or spell it out, depending on what I feel to be appropriate. 

DCS-Illu

The C&S system is a collection of indexes and needed to access data quickly. If no C&S system would be in place, the data would have to be processed one by one, until the data that are currently needed are found. Data are like a pile of small boxes, where each box contains a junk. "C", the Classification,  would be labels put on the box, with keywords that describe the content. "S", the structure, would be stacks of boxes that share a common keyword, grouped in columns by even broader keywords, then rooms, floors, buildings, facilities etc. 

The same data might be classified and structured for one person, but not for another. Classification and Structure is stored separately from the Data, because every human develops his own framework and classification structure, designed for his current needs, priorities and understandings of the world. This framework is constantly changing and also expanding throughout the entire life time of each person. It is not and will never be static and fixed.

Of course, if classifications and structure can be found for the data that a person collects, it could be the case that it is identical or partially compatible with the persons own classification system and structure. In some cases it can be adapted (replicated) as is, but in many cases is it necessary to modify the C&S found with the data before it is integrated into the existing C&S. Different terms might be used for the same thing or the structure needs to be diversified or simplified. (See the box with my example for clarifications and illustration) 

 

Example: Differences of the C&S used for ONE set of Data by Different People

A set of geological data about the moons of the planet Saturn. The data were compiled by a physicist/astronomer who is working for an university. The astronomer is a member of NASA's Cassini mission team and his full job is to work with the geological data collected by the probe about the moons. Since the physicist is an expert, who was working for years already on this specific subject and thus makes up a huge portion of that persons life, the data related to this subject are structured very deeply and many scientific classifications are used where most ordinary people never heard of. As most NASA mission data, this geological data are published on the NASA web site and made accessible to the public.

A person interested in astronomy comes across those data and decides to "store" some parts or all of it in his own archive. The classifications used by the scientist would most likely too specific and replaced by more generic ones instead. The structure would probably be flattened and simplified as well. While the physicist distinguishes moons by very specific geological properties, like by type of material the moons are made of, or properties like "geologically active" or not, with atmosphere or without etc., the person does not, classifying all of them simply as "moon of planet Saturn".

A Bio-Technical Marvel

The data with the corresponding C&S is stored in the human brain (memory). The human brain is a marvelous archiving system with a huge storage capacity. But the capacity is not limitless. It has two different sets where it can store the data, which work differently. There is the set that contains recently collected data and data that were recently used, but collected a long time ago already.The access to those data is very fast and ready to use  in an instant, if needed.The second set, with the largest capacity, holds data that were collected a long time ago and not used for a while either. 

The long term memory, the humans data archive and vault. Most data stored here take some time to access, many even require that the right trigger (Tag, Specific Classification) is used to even find the data itself. Usually data that were not used for while that are stored in the short and mid-term memory, are "moved' to the archive of the long-term memory and then moved to the deep areas of the archive, the one that requires the use of the right triggers to access them again. The brain automatically determines the relevance of each data and drops the ones it believes to be not to be relevant anymore. 

Every Has Flaws

This marvel of biological engineering has some serious flaws though. Classification of data happens based on the current C&S system used by the person. Data are also altered (mostly shrunk) over the course of time and their move between or within the 2 memory sets.It is virtually impossible to determine now if and when a set of data might be required in the future again. Vital data might get dropped or shrunk and thus unavailable or useless, once we need them again or the classification system changed so much, that it became hard to impossible to find and deliberately use the right triggers to access data that archived deep in the long term memory

Humans are perfectly aware of this problem and used various methods to compensate for those limitations and shortcomings. Things, physical objects, that can act as a trigger to access data in the distant future can be kept and stored somewhere and used when needed. Those object might even contain some or all of the data itself. When writing was invented for example, documents could be created that contain all the data, so the object would not just be a trigger, it would hold the entire data itself and allow the complete reconstruction, if the data that were kept in a persons memory were erased, shrunk or altered. Storing just the data is not enough, if the amount of data comes very large. Accessing a specific one when needed is not easy to virtually impossible.

The Catch 

The C&S must be stored outside the brain, together with the data in order to be able to access data again in a reasonable amount of time. The C&S attached to the data can also be stored like a written document outside the human brain of course. 

There is a problem though. The C&S system of a person changes over time. It is possible that it changed so much that the C&S used in the past and stored with the data became virtually incompatible to the current C&S system in use.It would make the data that were stored as inaccessible as if no C&S would have been stored with them in the first place.

The C&S of data in the short, mid-term and to a limited extend also the long-term memory are updated by the human brain automatically, if a change in the C&S system of a person occurs. This update must also be done, manually, with the C&S of the data that were stored "offline" as backup. Updating it every time there is a change would be insufficient and consume too much time. It should be done though, before the number and type of chances become too much to be applied without loss to the "offline" archive. 

A Look at Human History

Humans created archives with data that are relevant and/or vital for the society as whole. Those archives are typically administered by people who's job it is to keep the C&S system used for the archive up to date and most importantly help other people who would like to use data from that archive to find them, by assisting with the matching of that persons C&S systems to the one used by the archive, exact matching preferably, but at least partially only a smaller set of data might have to be processed one after another to find the one that matches.

A New Age

Now we entered the digital age and the access, replication and storage of vast amounts of data becomes easier, while the amount of data that is created or made accessible grows rapidly at the same time. The limitations of physical archives in terms of physical storage space to keep it and the time and cost associated with the creation of the documents are multiple times less when done electronically. Thanks to the rapid advancements in technologies, this reduction of limitations continues in an exponential rate. 

People can now create vast archives that contain data of interest to them on a scale unheard of in human history. The climax would be reached, if ALL DATA in existence would be accessible to ANYBODY in an instant at ANY TIME, which is of course only hypothetical, because this will NEVER happen. As long as words such as privacy, intellectual property and secret have any meaning in human society, ALL DATA will never become accessible by ANYBODY. Some data will always be restricted to one individual person or restricted and limited group of people. This means that there cannot be just a single data archive for everything without the need to repeated replication. 

Back to Reality

The reality is that even today, some data that are accessible today, might not so in the future for different reasons. So if a person accesses data today and deems it to be relevant and important to be able to access in the future again, this person will replicate the data and save them somewhere, where he has control of it (add, edit and delete) and access to (read) whenever needed.

Even if people believe that access will be available in the future and replication of them not required for a large amount of data, the problem of C&S of those data remains. The creation of a general C&S system for this huge and centralized digital data archive cannot substitute the C&S system in place by an individual. It would be way too complex and detailed and thus be useless as an index for fast access.

Conclusion

The C&S system of the person only has the size and dimensions that an individual needs today. Refinements are made in areas where more data are collected and used, such as when a person becomes a specialist in something. Structures are simplified if the data become less important and/or less frequently used, for example in the case where a person changes his career or if an once important hobby becomes less interesting and fades away, maybe because something else is pursuit  now instead.

Does this make sense to anybody but myself? Are my assumptions and speculations making sense or am I missing the mark entirely? Voice your thoughts and opinions via the comments section below, openly or anonymously.

Cheers!

Carsten aka Roy/SAC

Labels: ,

Suspicious, if not Fraudulent AT&T Rebates System

I just posted my article about my bad experience with my new Nokia phone, which I returned to my wireless provider AT&T where I got it from, in exchange for a new iPhone that is currently on back order and hopefully ready for me to pickup and use in one, latest two weeks.att-logo-orange-trans

How about "Semi-Fraud"? 

I don't know what word to use instead of fraud. Fraud implies illegal, what does not seem to be the case here. It might be illegal in Germany or other countries than the United States, but there is no indicator that I can see, which would indicate that it would be illegal here in the States as well. It is certainly suspicious and immoral at best. Beyond that it is up to you to decide what you want to call it or make out of it.

But I also don't have too much nice to say about AT&T. The only people who seem to hold stuff together there are the folks on the "first line of defense", the support guys who can only help as much as AT&T itself of the third party manufacturer of equipment are capable of.

"Heim ins Reich" or Something Like That

Some of the bull that comes with dealing with AT&T is the creation of some master-minds deep within the corporate headquarters of this juggernaut. AT&T was broken up once into smaller pieces, because it became so big that even the "pro-free-market" conservatives in the government knew that something had to be done.

That was several decades ago. My mobile phone provider used to be Cingular Wireless and my DSL (that I recently replaced with Fiber Optics) provider used to be Yahoo-SBC. They are all AT&T now.

This is just a note on the side. Maybe somebody feels the need to check once more, how big that beast actually became since it was cut down into pieces many years ago.

I mentioned fibre-optics already in my previous post. I also got this service (AT&T U-Verse) only recently. I basically ditched my old DSL and my Comcast Cable for TV and backup broadband Internet access and got AT&T U-Verse. Land line and wireless phone were already AT&T, difference there is only that the land line phone uses voice-over-IP (VoIP) instead of the traditional non-digital telephone technology.

Instant Rebate with Delays

AT&T offered like for everything else they have to offer, a rebate to customers, who think about buying a product or service from them. It helps to get the displayed price down, making customers belief that they get a better deal than they might end up getting at the end of the process.

Virtually ALL rebates are those crap-ass "MAIL-IN REBATES". This means that you FIRST pay the FULL price, even if you had to use a special URL or DISCOUNT code to get to the rebate offer in the first place. Then you get eventually the information needed to send something back to AT&T to APPLY to the REBATE. This does not happen automatically and is easy to miss. Learning from past experiences let me keep everything that I receive from AT&T until I got the rebate, including ANY packaging material and ANY piece of paper that comes with any equipment or any other mail (including stuff that looks like advertisement).

The reason for that is that it might turns out that you have to send something back to them that was attached to something that you and any normal human being would consider junk or garbage. Failing to provide this junk typically means to be unable to qualify and get the rebate. Getting a replacement of what is needed is typically impossible to get as well.

Well, I got U-Verse from AT&T about 2 months ago and I got finally the promised $100 rebate check that was advertised with a special coupon and made me respond to it.

Right Check, Right Bank, Wrong Amount

I went to my bank yesterday after my visit of the AT&T store to deposit the rebate check to my checking account. I am with Wells Fargo and their ATM's are capable of reading checks without envelope. That even works with checks that were written by hand (the amounts).

So the ATM sucked in the rebate check and scanned it. Then it asks for the confirmation of the amount and which of my accounts to deposit it to, checking or savings. I almost hit "checking" when I noticed that the amount was not $100 as it was printed clearly on the check itself. It showed $33.54 instead. Luckily I was only trying to deposit this one check. You can batch deposit several checks at once, what is what I typically do.

In that case I would have for sure missed the incorrect amount for the check and deposited it. I would probably notice the difference later at home, when I do my home banking, but at that time, the physical rebate check is gone. I have no idea what would happen, if I had deposited it and then contact AT&T customer service about this error, requesting the outstanding difference of $66.46. I don't know what the result of this would have been and  don't want to find out about myself.

ATTRebateCheckExample

The incorrect amount of $33.54 was read from the check. There is the number 34-54 above the number 730 and above the box with the actual check amount of *******$100.00 printed on that check. The check reader that had no problem with reading the correct amount from a personal check that I got from a friend nor any other check I received from various entities got the AT&T rebate check wrong. Bad enough, but worse, because it thought that it was actually reading the check correctly.

If it would have said that it cannot read the check and that I have to cash it within the bank through a human banker to verify the check amount, okay, a minor inconvenience, but at least one that does not lead to errors that can be overlooked and/or difficult to correct.

law_sign_questionCoincidence? That is Very Hard to Believe

I cannot imagine that this went unnoticed by AT&T, considering the number of rebate checks they must send out every single day for every single product and service they are offering to customers nationwide. My Nokia phone came with a mail-in rebate (which I did not apply for yet) and so does my new iPhone that I still have to receive yet.

What is to Gain?

So is it indented? I am curious to know how many people cash the check without noticing the error and thus get AT&T only a fraction of the rebate they are entitled for. Furthermore, what does AT&T do when I cash it with the wrong amount and demand to get paid the amount that is missing? If they pay up the difference, how long does that take? Playing the interest game, how much money AT&T is able to safe because of

  • delaying actual payment of promised rebates as long as possible?
  • delaying partial payments even further by sending initial rebate checks that are incorrectly processed by consumer banks automated check processing systems?
  • customers who are entitled for rebates not calling in those rebates as fast as possible (often due to the lack of information) or customers who fail to claim their rebates altogether?

You Decide for Yourself

Without knowing exact figures, my gut tells me... it must be MILLIONS of Dollars every month.

I cannot help it, but if this is not being done intentionally, then I must be completely paranoid or stupid.

Yeah, I know, It's because of the economy. It forces the most decent men to turn into vultures and immoral scum-bags Etc. yada yada yada ... Blah.. Right!

Cheers!

Carsten aka Roy/SAC

Labels: ,

Nokia Phone E71x Disappointment & The Super Mobility Promise

I was avoiding getting a smart phone with email capabilities and decent Internet connectivity for a long time. The reason for that is simple. I don't want to make myself accessible anywhere and anytime to everybody.

24/7/365 Any-Time / Any-Where Availability Curse

If you respond to any communication almost immediately regardless of the day of the week, time of the day and where you are at the moment, people will get used to it and act weird, if you suddenly change that habit and not respond as quickly as they expected. They might think that something is wrong with you or that they did something to upset you. But the only reason why you did not respond this one time was simply that you decided to take a time-out from your day to day business and personal life.

Making you accessible 24/7 is a double-edged sword. On the one hand it is good that you keep updated of things where ever you go and in almost real-time, at the same time makes this also very difficult to get your mind of things and to relax or to take a step back and re-evaluate your current place in your and your family's life.

supermobilitypromise

Interesting Facts about Taking Time Off

You take your mobile device on vacation for emergencies, but who are you trying to fool? Especially when you start a break, the mind will not be on that new "break'" / "vacation" mode. Even if you traveled half way around the earth and find yourself in a location that is very different to what you are used to, does the mind not let go of things that it is used to do and processes during all the previous months before you started your break.

A new environment helps, but what is needed is time, time that is not spend on anything associated with what your mind kept occupied before you got there. I cannot point to the source, but I heart one time that it takes about 2-3 days to one week for the mind to let go. Only at that point is it necessary for the body and mind truly to relax and to re-charge your batteries. I think it was a German study. It was definitely not something that I read while I was in the United States. That same study stated that this is the reason why a worker should have at least once per year 2 weeks of vacation in one piece, instead of taking a day or two off here and there.

One week to be able to really to let go (= waste) and the second  week to really re-fill your batteries and relax, release accumulated stress and pressure and prepare the body as well as the mind for another year of bombardment with stress.

Germans have more vacation than Americans. I think it is still at least 20 days per year, but typically somewhere between 25 and 30 days for most people. Maybe I read this stuff in a document that explained, why it was (and hopefully still is) required by law that an intern or employee of the age of under 25 years to take two weeks of his (I think mandatory 25 days) vacation in one piece, every year and that the HR department of the company where the young person is employed has to monitor and ensure that this is actually being done.

Making the Switch

Anyhow, I gave in to the pressure put on by myself mostly and got myself a new mobile phone with high-speed Internet access (3G) capabilities and Email support. I made the resolution that I won't change my habits too much when it comes to responding to people's emails to not give them the impression that I painted in elaborate visually descriptive worlds in the previous paragraphs.

att-logo-orange-transI (used to be) a Nokia Evangelist

nokia  iphone-logo

I am a fan of Nokia. I had some other phones by other providers like Motorola and Samsung in between, but always had issues with them that I never had with my Nokia's. Nokia phone used to be user friendly and easy to use without spending much time trying or worse, reading the manual. It had usually good to excellent reception and above-standard battery life.

The phone that I used all the previous years was a Nokia 6101. I went to a conference once and forgot the phone charger. I was horrified, because I knew that I need to use my cell phone constantly while I was at the conference and after (for the networking events and to hook up with people).

The conference was 3 days; I arrived one day before the show. You know what? The phone lasted to the last day. I only turned it off when I was going to bed and switched it back on the next morning. I was talking to people on the phone for hours and made/received dozens of calls. When I am not at a conference, the battery of the phone lasts easily 2 weeks and more. I never opened the user manual of the phone and was always able to do with it what I wanted without extensive searches and trying of all possible options available in the phone to find the one that I actually wanted to use. The option was usually always there and ready to use, when I intended to use it.

So instead of a fancy iPhone or Blackberry, I decided for a Nokia. The E71x to be exact.

NokiaE71xBewareAni2 Nokia E71x Review - Conclusion: HANDS OFF!

This phone did not work nor feel like a Nokia phone early on.

Transferring Contacts between Sim-Card & Phone One-by-One

The first shock I got was when I stored my contacts on my Nokia 6101 to my Sim-card (all at once, via an option that was easy to find, that I don't even know out of my head, where it can be found exactly), put it temporarily into my new Nokia (which came with a new AT&T Sim-card) and could not find the option to load all contacts from the Sim into the phone. I found out how to copy a single contact and how to either show contacts stored in the phone, on the Sim or both.

I gave up and opened the user manual. I quickly found the section that I was looking for, which to my surprise only describes what I was doing already myself, copy a single contact at the time. No mention of how to copy all contact to or from the Sim card. Don't ask, I still have not found that option, but it also does not matter. I don't have that phone anymore. But more to that in a little bit.

I had about 130-140 contacts that I kept in my old phone and needed to transfer to the new one. I did so one by one (which was time consuming, because not just because I had to do it one at a time, and for every phone number for a contact individually also, but because the option to initiate the copy was the most farthest away from when you opened the options sub menu for a contact in the detail page. There was also no short-cut to jump to the option, so I had to use the arrow keys to get there. 5 or 6 clicks, if I remember correctly.... every time, because it did not remember my previous choices of course.

(Short) Battery Life Time - A Crack Addict of the Power Charger

Next thing I noticed was that the phone went off entirely after less than 3 days, even though I just charged the whole thing completely. It sucked the whole thing empty within less than a week. I used the phone (to copy the contacts, configure some settings, browsing the web for 30 minutes and reading some emails) 2-3 hours at the most. The rest of the time the phone was on stand-by. I did not change the default power savings options, but assumed that it does not run on full power all the time as the factory default setting. I didn't check, but this is also not necessary anymore, because I don't have the phone anymore either.

I would compare the battery life-span of this Nokia with the Motorola Flip-phone that I used to have for a short while in the year 2000 (no, not the "Razor", that wasn't even around at this time). The phone practically hung on the charger whenever I was not on the road. I had a charger at home and the office and knew that I would be screwed, if I would forget taking it with me, if I had to leave town for more than 24 hours.

This was the main reason why I ditched that Motorola as soon as I could.

Internet Access - Watching Videos on the Phone - Disappointing at Best

I was able to access the Internet via the phone and checked out YouTube and tried to watch some videos. It did not work properly. I don't know if the connection was bad = AT&T's fault or if it was the phone.

The pre-installed video application, which pulled various videos using the build-in Real Player to access them was working somewhat. It also lagged in several cases, which interrupted the continuous play back of the videos.

Again, in this case might AT&T had to be blamed and not Nokia. I just mentioned it, because I did of course add to my overall experience. Being able to access interactive multi-media content with the phone was one of the more enjoyable features coming with a smart phone where I really looked forward to.

Email Access - Black Hole - No Sync or Recovery - BEWARES!

I found quickly the build in tool Xpress, which was the only one that had something remotely to do with accessing emails from existing email accounts via POP3 or IMAP. I use Google Hosted (Gmail basically) and needed to access it via POP3.

The application allowed me to do that, including the HTTPS secure connection via different ports and authentication for incoming as well as outgoing mails. The option that I could not find was the flag to "Leave Messages on the Server".

The email access on the phone was of course only intended as supplement, complimentary to the email client on my desktop computer. Well, since it had no setting to control this behavior, I wrongly assumed that it must always leave the messages on the server to prevent people from accidentally enabling this option. Well, it actually deletes messages after it downloaded them. Furthermore it also does not keep all messages. It only stores the last couple dozen or so and deletes messages beyond that figure (don't remember the exact number, but it was 50 or 100 at the most). It also deleted the messages that were not read yet.

Luckily for me, Gmail is setup to not delete messages, but archive them, so I did not lose emails entirely. I can still access them via the Gmail web interface. However, I cannot download them to my email client, because I have not found a way yet to reset the download/delete flag for individual or a group of email messages in Gmail. I can reset it for all emails that I have, 150,000+ of them, but I did not want to download all emails since 10+ years ago again to my computer, because I have 99.99999% of those already. But that is a different story. I posted (once again) at the Gmail support group/forum, but Google did not care about this issue when I pointed it out (in a different scenario) in the year 2007 and probably does not care more about it today.

Syncing (Everything) with a Desktop Computer (or Not)

I hoped to be able to sync at least what I got with the PC somehow. So I went and download the Nokia PC Suite software, connected the phone via USB with the computer (not via Bluetooth, which is also an option, because I did not want to take any chances) and ran the synchronization tool.

It downloaded my contacts from the phone to Outlook. It also downloaded my SMS messages that I received with the phone to somewhere. There was no sign of the email messages downloaded by the Xpress application though. I also could not find the option to access them somehow. I even couldn't find a way to access the file system and get the (probably binary) file where the application stores the data to my PC for analysis and possible recovery.

The Wrong Phone in Every Respect - for Anybody

I called AT&T tech support and tried to find out if I missed something here and learn about a way to recover and synchronize the downloaded emails somehow with my desktop email client. The technical support lady was very knowledgeable, I could tell. She was no douche-bag like some of those reps who don't know anything beyond what's scripted for them in the support manual.

No, there is no way and other things that I might want to do with the phone are also not possible with this Nokia phone, which does not follow any standard nor uses any standard software or operating system, no Windows Mobile and also no Android as far as I can tell. The phone was obviously a bad choice, it was not only falling short on what my needs are, it also falls short on what I would expect from a Nokia regarding the fundamental functionality to expect from a mobile phone.

Now I am Getting a Frickn' iPhone Anyway

I went to the AT&T store yesterday and returned it. I was thinking about getting a Blackberry, but then decided for a number of reasons for the iPhone 3Gs with 16 GB memory. I did not get the 32GB one, which is too expensive, but the 16 GB one wasn't on stock due to high demand. I will get the new phone next week or latest the week after that and use in the meantime my good old Nokia 6101, which was re-activated by AT&T for now.

Conclusion for the Nokia E71x Mobile Phone

If you planned to get this new Nokia phone and still do so, then I think that you did not read the previous paragraphs of this post. You might skim it too quickly and didn't get my message clearly. DON"T BUY THIS PHONE. It is not just the wrong phone for my personal needs, but obviously also the wrong phone for ANYBODIES needs. It is simply a bad phone. It sucks and Nokia should be ashamed to ever have put some crap like this on the market. Quality assurance at Nokia must have had time of or a gun at their heads or something like that. I don't know how else to explain how this junk ever got to show the name Nokia with everything that name represents to anybody outside the Nokia research laps itself.

One might think that a competitor replaced the phone with some junk to harm the Nokia brand name. Yeah, this could have been the case, if I had bought the phone off eBay.com from some dubious seller in Asia, but I got the phone directly and brand new (not refurbished) from AT&T directly. So the conspiracy theory can be thrown out of the windows right there.

iPhone3Gs 

One might say that I might don't have enough problems with technology at the moment and just needed another one of those to keep me occupied. Well, if you know me personally or read some of my older posts from end of last year etc. then you know that this statement was sarcasm pure. :|

Cheers!

Carsten aka Roy/SAC

Labels: ,

Copyright Complaint Notice Filings in the Scene? WTF?

It's not that I have already to deal with a lot of crap at the moment that something that just happened a few days ago has to come on top of all of it to "make my day" and "make my head shake in disbelief'".

It started with a big fat screen where you can see the snapshot of below, when I logged into one of my YouTube.com accounts. I was forced to acknowledge the message, before I could do anything else.

YouTube_Smash_Copyright_20090604

I was upset at first, because I thought that once more some idiot would claim something that is not his to begin with to cause trouble and inconvenience for YouTuber's, because they are full of themselves.

Dreyfus - Jarre - Oxygene & The Demoscene

Wouldn't be the first time. I still remember when in February 2008 a company with the name FRANCIS DREYFUS MUSIC came along and claimed the video recording of the PC/MS DOS demo called "Contrast" by the French demo group "Oxygene" from 1996 as their intellectual property that I was supposed to be infringing on. Well, Dreyfus did believe back then that any video with the word "Oxygene" in the title must be automatically infringing on the rights they hold for the music by the French musician Jean Michel Jarre with the same title.

Makes sense, doesn't it? Right ...

Anyhow, I did a Google search for the name of the somebody who claimed ownership of material used in some of my videos. Matt Swoboda, the plaintiff, turns out to be Matt James Swoboda, better known in the scene as "Smash" of Fairlight, Razor 1911, Beam, Insanity, Shadow and a few others.

Realtime Generation

ani2 The two video(s) in question used 12 and 45 seconds of a demo from 2008 by Andromeda Software Development (ASD) & Fairlight & Alcatraz, titled "Realtime Generation" (watch demo on Demoscene.tv), where "Smash" actually was one of the guys who created it, thus his claim was not so far fetched and absurd. I don't want to start debates about fair use and all this. I did use a fragment of the demo as back-drop for the intro of two of my amateurish videos with semi-professional background, but non-commercial use. In other words: I spent time on them and didn't receive a penny for it myself.

The full videos in question are available for viewing online and also for download in AVI video format at the following URLs below (in the case that you would like to make up your own mind about the use of the demo material).

Video 1: Download AVI (57 MB) - Watch Video on Facebook (requires FB account)
Video 2: Download AVI (72 MB) - Watch Video on Facebook

Anyhow, I do not intend to start a legal debate here, because that is not the reason why I blog this. My problem is the fact that a scener (Smash) filed an official copyright complaint against another scener, me, for something that could have been resolved quickly via a few emails, a phone or Skype call or chat instead. Since when did this become the means of communication in the scene? The time it took to prepare the official complaint was most likely more than the time it would have taken to check the background of the person behind the videos and to find the means to contact me. I did plaster the URLs to my web pages, including this one and all my other YouTube channels (including SACReleases) on the profile page of the YouTube account that hosted the videos in question (yeah, PAST TENSE is correct here, HOSTED).

Update/Addition: I just also recalled an incident at Dailymotion.com in January this year regarding the same material actually. There was a company called "Toei Animation" who claimed intellectual property ownership of one of the two videos. There was also no advanced email or anything, just a take down based on the claim by that company. I am unaware that anybody involved in the creation of the demo has any ties to that company and that they own anything of that demo. 

Team Mates or Hates?

Gosh, Smash and I were even in the same group once, Razor 1911. Both words in "team mate" seemed to have lost their meaning at one point from what it looks like.

Learn more about my past and present group allegiances here.

Misunderstandings?

I believe that I found Smash's LinkedIn profile and contacted him via the LinkedIn mail system (asking first, if the Matt Swoboda from the UK, is "my" Matt, who I am trying to get in touch with. A Finish scener with the name "Mandibular Joint Dysfunction" also contacted me via Facebook regarding this issue. He did not refer to the actual source of his information for me to check and follow up on, but I asked him to clarify where he heard of this "misunderstanding" (I hope that this is what it is).

The problem with those complaints in YouTube is that they don't go away and that my one account is now in jeopardy of being suspended because of anything that might comes up. YouTube does not care, double check or listens to anybody than a lawyer who threatens with legal actions in writing. I know this from first hand experience, since I got myself already an account suspended once, because of some BS, which caused some major pain in the ass for me, hours and hours of work lost and the unpleasant experience of "talking to a hand" that completely ignores you.

So resolving this "misunderstanding" means for me also that the official copyright complaint (actually two, one for each of the two videos) will be retracted that YouTube will remove those from my account history. Here is how it looks right now. Not very pretty, isn't it.

YouTube_account_status_cumbrowskicom_200906

Here is the video recording of my two little intros that started all this trouble

Backup Link to Video at Motionbox.com

As you can see, I did some modifications to the original video recording of the PC demo to make it suit my own purposes. Could I given credits? Sure I could have, but I didn't for several reasons. First, I didn't know who did what to be able to give accurate credits (I am still not sure about this part).

Furthermore, I only used tiny fragments of the demo and distorted it with effects and content that I created in front of the original video. The 2nd place demo at the party where Realtime Generation won 3rd place did a homage to some well know PC demos as well and also did not properly credited those, but everybody knew which demos were depicted.

I didn't give it another thought actually.

If you ask the question, how I would feel, if somebody would do the same with my art work, I'd say:
"No Problem"  and I actually made that one clear publicly in 2006 with clarifications added to it in 2008.

Update/Addition: I'd say something, if somebody would rip off my stuff and actively run around claiming that he did it. Not saying anything does not mean making a claim. If you want to know if somebody did something himself, entirely, partially or not at all, ask and see what the answer is.

If credits are "forgotten" and the creator asks for them, I would be the last to deny it to him. It usually boils always down to the question where and how to put them, without having the credits taking over the actual piece or destroy the setting where it is in. I added additional credits to stuff where I missed them myself and also asked others to add credits to their stuff, not always myself, but credits to other artists as well. 

Well, I hope that the the "Matt" at LinkedIn who I contacted is "my" "Smash" and that we will be able to sort things out. The LinkedIn profile says that he works at Sony now. Maybe he spent too much time "under some bad influence". Sony's approach to deal with copyright issues is not what I would call "consumer friendly" (I just say "root kit", do a Google search for "Sony root kit", if you don't know what I am referring to).

We will see. I will write another post, if something comes out of this.

Cheers!

Carsten aka Roy/SAC

 Update June 9, 2009.

Somebody pointed me via a comment here at my blog, to the original Pouet.net forum thread where it all started (the one "Mandibular" mentioned in his FB message). I joined the discussion there and addressed more comments than I probably should have, but then it wouldn't be me I guess. Anyhow, the discussion seems to have shifted to over there. It's already three pages long, but I hope that this will not scare you off from checking it out anyway. I hope that in all the BS that also seems to be part of the discussion there actually a resolution will be found that makes everybody happy again.

p.s. Also a message by Smaash (misspelled) turned up. It was sent via the contact form at Cumbrowski.com about one day before the videos were already taken down by YouTube. The message was unfortunately sorted away with all those messages about "link exchanges'", "web development in India proposals" etc.  and I didn't get a chance to look at it in time (yeah, my main computer is still broken, I got a new main board, but now miss a power connector for the GFX card fan to the mother board. I was already checking at RadioShack and other stores, including a PC repair shop to get such stupid connector that fits, but nobody has this. I found something online, got that one shipped as well... and guess what, wrong size! Gosh, how many versions of a three pin cooler fan to mother board connector are there?

Gateway still gives a crap. I hope that they will be out of business soon too. Bastards. 

Update June 18, 2009

I had some extensive email communication going with Smash and tried to elaborate the reasons for my rage and what I saw as the biggest problem with his actions. I thought that I made it already clear enough that I also admit that I made mistakes too.  In case that it was not clear for somebody yet, here some quotes from my emails to Matt.

I admit my own mistake. It taught me the lesson that whatever you put anywhere online, publicly or or not public and not protected, will be out there for anybody to find, if you only look hard enough for it. In this case my experiments of the creation of a short video introduction (there are more of those by the way, nothing I would be particular be proud of, but once they are out there, there is nothing I could do about them now). It was used for something small and semi personal to get some feedback and along the way learn how to do things better (testing is one of the key elements in marketing that you cannot ignore or neglect, no studies in the world can replace actual tests) .

Where there was the discussion about it, I provided honest information about the source of the material and included references and credits. Then it was "over" and I moved on. However, the "pilot" or "test" did not disappear how it usually does in the offline world. If it happens online, it's there virtually forever. I did not think about that somebody would even care about those experiments from yesterday, and certainly did not assume that somebody would have any issue with them.

My biggest mistake was to forget that it can look for somebody else completely different and all brand new, because that person just got exposed to it now and stuff in the digital world does not age or decay. It's there, brand new, like on the day it was created. I also did not include ALL details related to every bit of the content, which gave room for miss-interpretations.

Matt understood the issue and said that he will try to retract the complaint at YouTube.com. That was 6 days ago on Friday June 12, 2009, but today Thursday, June 18, 2009 does it still show in my YouTube account the complaint and that my account is not in good standing.

I provided him with a lot of material regarding the copyright issue on the Internet, including some very bad examples where it is clear that the system is completely messed up and a harm to society in general. I hope that he now also understands my rage about the way he acted on the problem.

He is surely not a large corporation like Sony and just an individual like, but he unfortunately acted like a big corporation and used by extension another big corporation (Google) to get things his way. I believe that he was not aware that the corporate system in place today is truly against individuals and often creates significant collateral damage and overall more harm than good.

I also asked him for his advice regarding Pouet.net. I am still undecided, if I should post once more to apologize to the folks who I gave credits for comments that they did not make or if I should just let it be the way it is. My error was pretty obvious (afterwards) and I also was consistent with it, so folks should have been able to figure it out. I did not get a response regarding that from Mark as well. It is kind of odd, because he usually responded within less than 24 hours to my emails, until Friday.

I will send him another email about this blog update. The matter is still not completely resolved, because the main issue for me is still there and that is the note in my YouTube account. :(

Update July 14, 2009 and Conclusion

Matt hold true to his word and also be able to get through to somebody at Google to retract the Copyright complaint as promised. I Just check my YouTube account today to see, if anything changed and yes, the Warning is gone and the status shows "Good Standing" again. Phew... I think that this could have been resolved much easier and without creating as much headaches, but then I believe that everybody involved in this mess, learned some valuable lessons for the future.

YouTubeCumbrowskiComAccStatus20090714

Labels: , , , ,

Convert Word 2007 Documents and Upload to Google Docs

It started with a script by Michael Suodenjoki called "docx2pdf.vbs" that lets you convert individual Word 2007 documents to PDF. It is possible to use it to process a batch of files, such as all documents in a specific directory, by using (programming) another sophisticated MS DOS batch script, but that is a pain in the neck itself. I ran into issues, because I had spaces in the file names of the documents that I wanted to convert and I thought to myself that it is probably easier and safer to change the VBScript itself instead of writing another script in a different language.

By the way, for the conversion to PDF format with Microsoft Word 2007 is it necessary that you installed next to Microsoft Office 2007 of course, also the "Microsoft Save as PDF" Add-In for 2007 Office, which is available for free download at the Microsoft.com web site here.

Extending the Docx2Pdf Conversion Script

So I changed the script to allow the processing of a whole folder instead of just one file. While I was doing that, I realized that I need  a filter to make sure that I only process  documents that Word 2007 can load. While I was thinking about a solution about that, I realized that a)  Word 2007 supports more than just Word 2007 .DOCX documents and b) that the Google Docs API only supports Word 97 .DOC documents and not PDF, like the manual uploader in their web interface. Converting my Word 2007 documents to be able to get them up on Google Docs was actually the cause to get me started with all this.

Google Docs Limitations

The Google Docs web uploader supports Adobe PDF and Word 97 DOC format for documents, but you have to upload documents one by one manually. That sucks big time and I hope that Google will do something about that soon, but in the mean time there is not much we can do about it. In order to get several documents up on Google Docs quickly, you have to use their API or the create document via Email or Email with Word 97 document attachment features. Adobe PDF is supposed to work with their GData API for Google Docs, but I never got those Python scripts to work. I was able to connect to Google, but not to transfer... anyway.

Word 2007 supports the output of documents in numerous formats, including Word 97, HTML, RTS, TXT and PDF, if you installed the free Microsoft PDF Add-on. So I added the option to specify the output format.

Then I was thinking of automation of uploads to Google Docs and realized that I needed an additional filter to avoid that I will ending up sending the same documents to Google over and over again. Thus I added some date filter options based on the creation date and date when the document was last modified.

Last but not least I had to add the option to send the converted documents (that were converted to .DOC format) to Google Docs. The upload via email was the way to go and my script was complete. Here is what came out of all of this.

Save Word 2007 Documents in a different Format and more

Usage: cscript /nologo doc2pdf.vbs [<input-file>] [/dir:<input-dir>] 
[/date:created/modified] [/datefrom:mm-dd-yyyyy] [/dateto:mm-dd-yyyy] [/days:nn]
[/f:<output-format>] [/o:<output-file>] [/googledocs:<email>]

Basic Options:


/help  
Specifies that this usage/help information should be displayed.


/verbose
Specifies that detailed information about the processing should be displayed.


Parameters (optional):

/dir:<input-dir>
Directory Batch Processing. Use <input-file> argument as filter option (e.g. *.DOCX or *.* for all)
Date Filter Options

/date:created/modified
Date filter option (only for batch processing). Specify if the date parameters should apply to either the
creation date of the file or the date when it was last modified.


/datefrom:mm-dd-yyy
/datetto:mm-dd-yyy

From and To Date options for that work together with the /date option. If /dateto is not provided, then the script will automatically assume today. Alternative to a specific date range is it possible to provide the following parameter


/days:nn
"nn" stands for a numeric value from 0 to whatever and are the number of days from today, to determine the from date. The value 1 for example would mean yesterday, or files that were created/changed since yesterday until today. 7 would be a week and so on.


Output Options Parameters


/f:<format>
Specifies the output format values: DOCX, DOCM, DOTX, DOTM, XML, PDF (default), XPS, TXT, DOS, ASC, HTML, HTM, RTS, DOC, WEB


/o:<file>
Optionally specification of output file, which only works for single file conversions and not batch processing.


Send to Google Docs via Email Option


/googledocs:<email>


Your personal email to upload documents, which looks like: longstring@prod.writely.com
You can find that email, if you login to your Google Docs account and go to the "Upload" screen.


Note: Google Docs only supports the import of documents in DOC file format (Office 97).
PDF files are not supported. The file size is also limited to 500KB per document.


Examples:


1. Convert all Word 2007 documents (.docx) that were modified on or since December 31, 2008 and are located in C:\DOCS to PDF and show detailed information about the processing.

cscript /nologo docx2pdf2.vbs *.docx /f:PDF /dir:C:\DOCS /date:modified /datefrom:12-31-2008 /verbose

2. Convert all Word 2007 documents (.docx) that where created in the last 7 days and are located in
C:\MY DOCUMENTS to Word 97 (.DOC) and send them to Google Docs.

cscript /nologo docx2pdf2.vbs *.docx /f:DOC /dir:"C:\MY DOCUMENTS" /date:created /days:7 
/googledocs:mysecretemail@prod.writely.com

3. Convert a single Word 2007 Document C:\DOCS\mydocument.docx to PDF and save it as
C:\MY DOCUMENTS\mynewdocument.pdf

cscript /nologo docx2pdf2.vbs "C:\DOCS\mydocument.docx" /o:"C:\MY DOCUMENTS\mynewdocument.pdf" 

4. Convert C:\DOCS\mydocument.docx to HTML and save it in the same folder

cscript /nologo docx2pdf2.vbs "C:\DOCS\mydocument.docx" /f:HTML 


Notes and Considerations


The script must be called with CSCRIPT.EXE instead of WSCRIPT.EXE, because it makes use of the STDOUT option of VBSCRIPT. WSCRIPT.EXE is used by default, if you start a .VBS Visual Script document (e.g. double click or call from a .BAT file).  Its not the end of the world, if you dont, because the script will re-launch itself 
using CSCRIPT, if you execute it with WSCRIPT anyway. However that might cause other  issues, depending how you are using this script.  For example the redirection of the output into a text file wont work, because 
the script opens a new DOS session. I used the proper call of the script in my examples above. The "/nologo" parameter is not required by the way. I only use it to suppress the Microsoft messages and screens.


There are different ways to send out emails via a script that runs on a users computer, each with their own problems and advantages. I implemented two options into my script. By default is Microsofts CDO used to send out the emails to Google Docs, but I also added the option to use Outlook MAPI instead.


Using MAPI instead of CDO


Pretty near the beginning of the script is a line that reads:

Const EmailSendMethod = 2 1 = MAPI (Outlook), 2 = CDO

To use MAPI instead of CDO, simply change this line to

Const EmailSendMethod = 1 1 = MAPI (Outlook), 2 = CDO

I wanted to go with MAPI first, but the biggest problems that I had were those stupid security messages that popped up every time that I wanted to send one email to Google. Since I do not want to sit in front of the computer to acknowledge dozens or more emails/documents to be sent, I changed the script to use CDO instead.


DOCX2PDF-MAPI-Security1Here is what I got when I used MAPI. First was this message, which made perfect sense to me, although I missed the option to say "always allow access for this application" that it does not come up in the future anymore.


I know that from Skype and it works perfect there, but nothing like it in Microsoft Outlook.


 


Anyhow, I set the option to "Allow access for 10 minutes", which should have been enough to process a bunch of documents and send them out to Google, but it wasnt to be like that. Instead I got a pop-up every time I created a new Email object. The Message window has the "Allow" button disabled for several seconds, before you can approve the email to be created and nothing is done until you pressed "Allow", over and over again.


DOCX2PDF-MAPI-Security2


If you know how I can tell Outlook 2007 to trust my script that resides locally on the users machine and thus be able to use MAPI to generate email messages automatically, please let me know. I know that you can get something like a "Trusted Publisher Certificate", but hey, I am not a software company who is selling a commercial plug-in to people, not even a compiled program at all. Its plain and pure code that is executed and processed by Windows on the fly, without the need to compile it first.


CDO Requirements and Troubleshooting


CDO uses the build-in SMTP server feature that comes with Windows XP (except XP Home). It is not installed by default. You can install SMTP by going to "Start\Control Panel\Add or Remove Programs". There select on the left the Tab "Add/Remove Windows Components". Scroll down to "Internet Information Services (IIS)", highlight it and press the "Details" button. There you have to enable "SMTP Service", which will automatically also enable "Common Files" and "World Wide Web Service", if it was not installed already on your computer either. Press "Okay" to close the "Details" screen and then "Next". Follow the steps on the screen. You might require your original Windows Installation Disk, so have it handy before you get started with this.


The script will error out, if you do not have SMTP installed on your machine yet!


The nice thing about it is that you dont even require to have an email client installed and running (or ready to run) in order to send out an email from your machine. That is a draw-back as well, because you will dont have a reference or copy of the emails that you sent out. They wont appear in  the "Sent" folder of MS Outlook, Outlook Express, Live Mail or whatever email client you might be using.


DOCX2PDF-CDO-PickupFolder


If you had SMTP installed on your computer already, but not running (like I did), then the script will run without any errors. It will also say that it sent out the emails to Google, but that is not entirely correct. It created it, yes, but sending them is an entirely different story. If the SMTP service is stopped, no email is being sent. Windows dumps the prepared emails into the "Pickup" folder of "IIS", which is located by default at "C:\Inetpub\mailroot\Pickup", unless you configured it to be somewhere else.


Make sure that the SMTP Service is running. To check that and to start the service manually, go to your computers "Administrative Tools" and start "Services" (Administrative Tools are located in the "Control Panel", like the "Add or Remove Programs" tool). Look for the service with the name "Simple Mail Transfer Protocol (SMTP)". See the image below for illustration.


DOCX2PDF-CDO-SMTP-Service


Double-Click on it and press "Start", if the status of the service is anything else than "Started". If it fails to start, then it could be that services where it depends on are not started as well. You can find out by selecting the "Dependencies" tab. Make sure that the services listed there are running as well.


DOCX2PDF-CDO-SMTP-Dependency


See on the left. It shows that the "Event Log" and "IIS Admin" services need to run that the SMTP service can be started as well.


Once the SMTP service is running, you are ready to rock and roll. If you ran the script and then found out that the service was not running, emails stuck in the "Pickup" folder will not be processed automatically once SMTP is running. Another email must be triggered that SMTP will pick them up and add them to its processing "Queue" folder for sending and then finally send it out to Google.


 


DOCX2PDF-CDO-Queue


SMTP Service Security (for CDO)DOCX2PDF-CDO-IIS-SMTP1


Having the SMTP Service running will upset some anti-virus or anti-spyware programs, because it can become an issue, if it is not secured, detected by hackers and then abused to relay spam message via your computer to other people on the Internet.


You dont to invite trouble, so go and change the security settings that nobody else can use your mail service, except you.


DOCX2PDF-CDO-IIS-SMTP2Open the IIS manager, which is located under "Administrative Tools" (like the "Services" tool). There you will find the item "Default SMTP Virtual Service" entry on the left.


Highlight it, right-click with your mouse and select "Properties". Then select the "Access" tab and click on the "Authentication" button.


It is probably set to "Anonymous Access". Change that to "Integrated Windows Authentication".


Users that need permissions to use the service can be added via the "Security" tab as needed.


This will take of things and keep your SMTP service on your machine secure.


Email Delivery Issues with Google Docs


I use the secret email address for your Google Docs account not only as the TO address of the email, but also as the sender address as well. This has a nice little side effect to it.


Sometimes there are issues with Google Docs and it is unable to process a document that it received via attachment of an email for whatever reason.


If the email delivery fails, a system notification is being sent by the receiving mail server to the sender of the email, your Google Docs upload email address. Since the email upload feature also supports sending a whole text email to be converted to a document, this is what Google Docs is doing with the Error emails that it receives about the original uploads that failed.DOCX2PDF-CDO-GoogleDocs1


If you open up such Error Email document, you will be able to find out, which document (file name) that was sent by the script was not uploaded and processed properly. Just send it again with another batch or upload it manually via the web interface, whatever is easier for you.


 DOCX2PDF-CDO-GoogleDocs2


The Script and the Source Code Download


Here is the source code that you can see how the various features were implemented (and to use it for your own tools and scripts hehe). Dont type it off the screen or copy and paste it into a document, if you want to use my script as it is. You can download the full source of it here as a text file. It is called docx2pdf2.vbs.txt. Rename it to remove the .TXT and you are ready to rock and roll.


Thats it! Have Fun!


Carsten aka Roy/SAC


   1:  
   2:   DOC2PDF2.VBS Microsoft Scripting Host Script (Requires Version 5.6 or newer)
   3:   --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
   4:   Author: Carsten Cumbrowski 
   5:   Created: December 2008 and February 2009
   6:   
   7:   Based on a script by  Michael Suodenjoki
   8:   This script can create a PDF file from a Word document provided youre using
   9:   Word 2007 and have the Office Add-in: Save As PDF installed.
  10:   It can also save the documents in other formats that are supported by MS Word 2007
  11:   The script allows batch processing of multiple files (e.g. a directory) and also the 
  12:   sending via email to Google Docs (output format DOC, Office 97 required) 
  13:  
  14:   Script must be called with CSCRIPT instead of WSCRIPT
  15:   Its not the end of the world, if you dont, because the script will relaunch itself 
  16:   using CSCRIPT, if you execute it with WSCRIPT anyway. However that might cause other
  17:   issues, depending how you are using this script
  18:   For example the redirection of the output into a text file wont work, because 
  19:   the script opens a new DOS session
  20:   
  21:  ForceCscript true
  22:   Constants
  23:   
  24:  Const iGoogleDocsSizeLimit = 5120000
  25:  Const iGoogleDocsReqFormat = 0
  26:   
  27:  Const WdDoNotSaveChanges = 0
  28:  Const EmailSendMethod = 2   1 = MAPI (Outlook), 2 = CDO
  29:   
  30:   see WdSaveFormat enumeration constants: 
  31:   http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb238158.aspx
  32:  Const wdFormatPDF = 17   PDF format. 
  33:  Const wdFormatXPS = 18   XPS format. 
  34:  Const wdFormatDocument97=0  Word97 Format
  35:  Const wdFormatDocumentDefault = 16 Word Default (.DOCX in Word2007)
  36:   
  37:  Const wdFormatWebArchive = 9 Web Archive
  38:   
  39:  Const wdFormatTemplate = 1 Word 97 Template
  40:   
  41:  Const wdFormatRTF = 6 RTF
  42:   
  43:  Const wdFormatHTML = 8 Std HTML
  44:  Const wdFormatFilteredHTML = 10 Filtered HTML
  45:   
  46:  Const wdFormatText = 2 Windows Text
  47:  Const wdFormatTextLineBreaks = 3 Windows Text with line-breaks preserved
  48:  Const wdFormatEncodedText = 7 Encoded Text (Unicode)
  49:  Const wdFormatUnicodeText = 7
  50:  Const wdFormatDOSTextLineBreaks = 5 DOS Text w Line-Breaks
  51:  Const wdFormatDOSText = 4 DOS
  52:   
  53:   
  54:  Const wdFormatXML = 11 XML
  55:  Const wdFormatXMLDocument = 12 XML DOc   .docx
  56:  Const wdFormatXMLDocumentMacroEnabled = 13 XML Macros Enabled  .docm
  57:  Const wdFormatXMLTemplate = 14 XML Template .dotx
  58:  Const wdFormatXMLTemplateMacroEnabled = 15 XML Template Macros Enabled  .dotm
  59:   
  60:  Const TEXTMSG = 0
  61:  Const HTMLMSG = 1
  62:   
  63:   Global variables
  64:  Dim arguments, bShowDebug, sOutFormat, iwdFormat, sOutExt, sFolder
  65:  Dim owdo  As Word.Application
  66:  Dim owdocs  As Word.Documents
  67:  Dim ofso, bDateFilter, sDateFilterType, sDateFrom, sDateTo, iDays
  68:  Dim bVerbose,output, sGoogleEmail
  69:  Dim ol, ns
  70:   
  71:  Set arguments = WScript.Arguments
  72:  sOutFormat = "PDF"
  73:  bDateFilter = false
  74:   
  75:  sDateFilterType = ""
  76:  sDateFrom = ""
  77:  sDateTo = ""
  78:  sGoogleEmail = ""
  79:   
  80:   
  81:  --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  82:  Function DetermineOutFormat(sOut)
  83:     Dim iOut
  84:     Select Case ucase(sOUt)
  85:      Case ""
  86:          iOut = wdFormatPDF 
  87:          sOutExt = "pdf"
  88:    Case "PDF"
  89:          iOut = wdFormatPDF 
  90:    Case "XPS"
  91:          iOut = wdFormatXPS 
  92:    Case "DOC"
  93:          iOut = wdFormatDocument97
  94:      Case "DOT"
  95:          iOUt = wdFormatTemplate 
  96:    Case "HTML"
  97:          iOut = wdFormatHTML 
  98:    Case "HTM"
  99:          iOut = wdFormatFilteredHTML 
 100:    Case "DOCX"
 101:          iOut = wdFormatXMLDocument 
 102:    Case "DOCM"
 103:          iOut = wdFormatXMLDocumentMacroEnabled 
 104:    Case "DOTX"
 105:          iOut = wdFormatXMLTemplate 
 106:    Case "DOTM"
 107:          iOUt = wdFormatXMLTemplateMacroEnabled 
 108:    Case "TXT"
 109:          iOut = wdFormatTextLineBreaks 
 110:    Case "XML"
 111:      iOUt = wdFormatXML 
 112:    Case "ASC"
 113:          iOUt = wdFormatDOSTextLineBreaks 
 114:    Case "DOS"
 115:          iOUt = wdFormatDOSText 
 116:          sOutExt = "txt"
 117:      Case "RTF"
 118:          iOut =     wdFormatRTF     
 119:      Case "WEB"
 120:          iOUt = wdFormatWebArchive 
 121:      Case else
 122:         iOut = -1
 123:    End Select
 124:    DetermineOutFormat = iOut
 125:   
 126:  End Function
 127:   
 128:   
 129:  ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 130:   ECHOUSAGE
 131:   Outputs the usage information.
 132:  
 133:  Function EchoUsage()
 134:    If arguments.Count=0 Or arguments.Named.Exists("help") Or _
arguments.Named.Exists("h") or iwdFormat=-1 Then
 135:     output.WriteLine "Save Word 2007 Compatible Document(s) in a different Format and more"
 136:     output.WriteLine ""
 137:     output.WriteLine "Usage: cscript /nologo doc2pdf.vbs [<input-file>] [/dir:<input-dir>] " & _ 
"[/date:created/modified] [/datefrom:mm-dd-yyyyy] " & _
"[/dateto:mm-dd-yyyy] [/days:nn] [/f:<output-format>] " & _
"[/o:<output-file>] [/googledocs:<email>]"
 138:     output.WriteLine  ""
 139:     output.WriteLine  "Available Options:"
 140:     output.WriteLine  "=================="
 141:     output.WriteLine  "/help - Specifies that this usage/help information should be displayed."
 142:     output.WriteLine  "/verbose - Specifies that detailed information about the " & _
"processing should be displayed."
 143:     output.WriteLine  ""
 144:     output.WriteLine  "Parameters (optional):"
 145:     output.WriteLine  "======================"
 146:     output.WriteLine  "/dir:<input-dir>"
 147:     output.WriteLine  "    Directory Batch Processing. Use <input-file> argument as " & _
"filter option (e.g. *.DOCX or *.* for all)"
 148:     output.WriteLine  ""
 149:     output.WriteLine  "Date Filter Options"
 150:     output.WriteLine  "--------------------"
 151:     output.WriteLine "/date:created/modified - Date filter option"
 152:     output.WriteLine "/datefrom:mm-dd-yyy - From Date for date-created or date-modfied filter"
 153:     output.WriteLine "/datetto:mm-dd-yyy - To Date for date-created or date-modfied filter"
 154:     output.WriteLine " ...or .."
 155:     output.WriteLine "/days:nn - created/changed within the last nn days. "
 156:     output.WriteLine ""
 157:     output.WriteLine "Output Options Parameters"
 158:     output.WriteLine "-------------------------"
 159:     output.WriteLine  " /f:<format> Specifies the output format values:"     
 160:     output.WriteLine  "    DOCX, DOCM, DOTX, DOTM, XML, PDF (default), XPS, TXT," & _
" DOS, ASC, HTML, HTM, RTS, DOC, WEB"
 161:     output.WriteLine  " /o:<file> Optionally specification of output file."
 162:     output.WriteLine ""
 163:     output.WriteLine "Send to Google Docs via Email Option"
 164:     output.WriteLine "------------------------------------"
 165:     output.WriteLine "Note: Google Docs only supports the import of documents in " & _
"DOC file format (Office 97)."
 166:     output.WriteLine "PDF files are not supported. The file size is also limited to " & _
"500KB per document."
 167:     output.WriteLine ""
 168:     output.WriteLine "/googledocs:<email> - your personal email to upload documents," & _
                             " which looks like: longstring@prod.writely.com "
 169:     output.WriteLine ""      
 170:     output.WriteLine  "Examples:"
 171:     output.WriteLine  "========="
 172:     output.WriteLine "1. Convert all Word 2007 documents (.docx) that were modified " & _
"on or since December 31, 2008 and are located in C:\DOCS " & _
"to PDF and show detailed information about the processing."
 173:     output.WriteLine ""
 174:     output.WriteLine "cscript /nologo docx2pdf2.vbs *.docx /f:PDF /dir:C:\DOCS " & _
"/date:modified /datefrom:12-31-2008 /verbose"
 175:     output.WriteLine ""
 176:     output.WriteLine "2. Convert all Word 2007 documents (.docx) that where created " & _
"in the last 7 days and are located in C:\MY DOCUMENTS to " & _
"Word 97 (.DOC) and send them to Google Docs. "
 177:     output.WriteLine ""
 178:     output.WriteLine "cscript /nologo docx2pdf2.vbs *.docx /f:DOC /dir:""C:\MY DOCUMENTS"" " & _
"/date:created /days:7 /googledocs:mysecretemail@prod.writely.com"
 179:     output.WriteLine ""
 180:     output.WriteLine "3. Convert a single Word 2007 Document C:\DOCS\mydocument.docx " & _
"to PDF and save it as C:\MY DOCUMENTS\mynewdocument.pdf"
 181:    output.WriteLine ""
 182:     output.WriteLine "cscript /nologo docx2pdf2.vbs ""C:\DOCS\mydocument.docx"" " & _
"/o:"
"C:\MY DOCUMENTS\mynewdocument.pdf"""
 183:     output.WriteLine ""
 184:     output.WriteLine "4. Convert C:\DOCS\mydocument.docx to HTML and save it in " & _
"the same folder"
 185:     output.WriteLine ""
 186:     output.WriteLine "cscript /nologo docx2pdf2.vbs ""C:\DOCS\mydocument.docx"" /f:HTML"
 187:     output.WriteLine ""                         
 188:    End If 
 189:  End Function
 190:   
 191:  -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 192:   CHECKARGS
 193:   Makes some preliminary checks of the arguments.
 194:   Quits the application is any problem is found.
 195:  
 196:  Function CheckArgs()
 197:     Check that <doc-file> is specified
 198:    If arguments.Unnamed.Count <> 1 Then
 199:      output.WriteLine "Error: Obligatory <doc-file> parameter missing!"
 200:      WScript.Quit 1
 201:    End If
 202:   
 203:  if arguments.Named.Exists("f") then
 204:        sOutFormat = arguments.Named.Item("f")
 205:  end if
 206:   
 207:  if arguments.Named.Exists("googledocs") then
 208:    sGoogleEmail =  arguments.Named.Item("googledocs")
 209:  end if    
 210:  if sGoogleEmail <> "" then
 211:     sOutFormat = "DOC"
 212:  end if
 213:   
 214:  sOutExt = sOutFormat
 215:  iwdFormat = DetermineOutFormat(sOutFormat)
 216:   
 217:  if arguments.Named.Exists("date") then
 218:   
 219:      if arguments.Named.Exists("days") then
 220:         if isNumeric(arguments.Named.Item("days")) then
 221:            iDays = int(abs(arguments.Named.Item("days")))
 222:            sDateFrom = formatdatetime(dateadd("d",iDays*-1,now),vbshortdate)
 223:            sDateTo = formatdatetime(now,vbshortdate)
 224:         end if
 225:       else
 226:          if arguments.Named.Exists("datefrom") then
 227:            if isDate(arguments.Named.Item("datefrom")) then
 228:              sDateFrom = formatdatetime(arguments.Named.Item("datefrom"),vbshortdate)
 229:            end if
 230:          end if
 231:           if arguments.Named.Exists("dateto") then
 232:             if isDate(arguments.Named.Item("dateto")) then
 233:                sDateTo = formatdatetime(arguments.Named.Item("dateto"),vbshortdate)
 234:             end if
 235:           else
 236:               sDateTo = formatdatetime(now,vbshortdate)
 237:           end if
 238:           end if
 239:           
 240:       if arguments.Named.Item("date") = "created" then
 241:          sDateFilterType = "c"
 242:       end if
 243:       if arguments.Named.Item("date") = "modified" then
 244:          sDateFilterType = "m"
 245:       end if
 246:      
 247:       if sDateFilterType <> "" and sDateFrom <> "" and sDateTo <> "" then
 248:          bDateFilter = true
 249:                  if bVerbose = true then
 250:                     output.WriteLine "Date Filter on! From Date: " & sDateFrom & _
", To Date: " & sDateTo & ", Filter: " & sDateFilterType
 251:                  end if
 252:       end if
 253:   
 254:  end if
 255:   
 256:   
 257:   
 258:   
 259:  End Function
 260:   
 261:  ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 262:   DOC2PDF
 263:   Converts a Word document to PDF using Word 2007.
 264:   Input:
 265:   sDocFile - Full path to Word document.
 266:   sPDFFile - Optional full path to output file.
 267:  
 268:   If not specified the output PDF file
 269:   will be the same as the sDocFile except
 270:   file extension will be .pdf.
 271:  
 272:  Function DOC2PDF( sDocFile, sPDFFile )
 273:   
 274:   
 275:    Dim owdoc  As Word.Document
 276:    Dim sPrevPrinter  As String
 277:   
 278:   
 279:    if sFolder = "" then
 280:        sDocFile = ofso.GetAbsolutePathName(sDocFile)
 281:          sTmpFolder = ofso.GetParentFolderName(sDocFile)
 282:    else
 283:      sDocFile = sDocFile
 284:      sTmpFolder = sFolder
 285:    end if
 286:   
 287:    If Len(sPDFFile)=0 Then
 288:      sPDFFile = ofso.GetBaseName(sDocFile) + "." + lcase(sOutExt)
 289:    End If
 290:   
 291:    If Len(ofso.GetParentFolderName(sPDFFile))=0 Then
 292:      sPDFFile = sTmpFolder + "\" + sPDFFile
 293:    End If
 294:   
 295:   
 296:     Enable this line if you want to disable autoexecute macros
 297:     owdo.WordBasic.DisableAutoMacros
 298:       if bVerbose = true then
 299:           output.WriteLine "Converting: " & sDocFile 
 300:       end if                
 301:     Open the Word document
 302:    Set owdoc = owdocs.Open(sDocFile)
 303:   
 304:     Let Word document save as PDF
 305:     - for documentation of SaveAs() method,
 306:       see http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb221597.aspx 
 307:    owdoc.SaveAs sPDFFile, iwdFormat 
 308:   
 309:    owdoc.Close WdDoNotSaveChanges
 310:   
 311:       if bVerbose = true then
 312:           output.WriteLine "Saved As: " & sPDFFile & "(Format: " & iwdFormat & ")"
 313:       end if                
 314:   
 315:       if sGoogleEmail <> "" then
 316:          SendEmailToGoogleDocs sGoogleEmail, sPDFFile
 317:       end if
 318:  End Function
 319:   
 320:  ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 321:   Returns an array with the file names that match Path.
 322:   The Path string may contain the wildcard characters "*"
 323:   and "?" in the file name component. The same rules apply
 324:   as with the MSDOS DIR command.
 325:   If Path is a directory, the contents of this directory is listed.
 326:   If Path is empty, the current directory is listed.
 327:   Author: Christian dHeureuse (www.source-code.biz)
 328:   
 329:  Public  Function ListDir (ByVal Path)
 330:     Dim fso: Set fso = CreateObject("Scripting.FileSystemObject")
 331:     If Path = "" then Path = "*.*"
 332:     Dim Parent, Filter
 333:     if fso.FolderExists(Path) then       Path is a directory
 334:        Parent = Path
 335:        Filter = "*"
 336:       Else
 337:        Parent = fso.GetParentFolderName(Path)
 338:        If Parent = "" Then If Right(Path,1) = ":" Then Parent = Path: Else Parent = "."
 339:        Filter = fso.GetFileName(Path)
 340:        If Filter = "" Then Filter = "*"
 341:        End If
 342:     ReDim a(10)
 343:     Dim n: n = 0
 344:     Dim Folder: Set Folder = fso.GetFolder(Parent)
 345:     Dim Files: Set Files = Folder.Files
 346:     Dim File
 347:     For Each File In Files
 348:   
 349:          bDateFiltered = false
 350:        if bDateFilter = true then
 351:             if sDateFilterType = "c" then
 352:               dDate = File.DateCreated 
 353:             end if            
 354:             if sDateFilterType = "m" then
 355:               dDate = File.DateLastModified
 356:             end if
 357:                       if datediff("d",dDate,sDateFrom) >= 0  or _
                               datediff("d",dDate,sDateTo) < 0 then
 358:                         bDateFiltered = true
 359:                           if bVerbose = true then
 360:                               output.WriteLine File.Name & " skipped (Date Filter), (dc: " & _
File.DateCreated & ", dm: " & File.DateLastModified & ")"
 361:                           end if
 362:                       end if      
 363:              end if
 364:        if  bDateFiltered = false then
 365:            If CompareFileName(File.Name,Filter) Then
 366:                If n > UBound(a) Then ReDim Preserve a(n*2)
 367:                a(n) = File.Path
 368:                n = n + 1
 369:                    else
 370:                           if bVerbose = true then
 371:                               output.WriteLine File.Name & _
                                    " skipped (File Path Filter Argument)"
 372:                           end if                    
 373:            End If
 374:              end if
 375:        Next
 376:     ReDim Preserve a(n-1)
 377:     ListDir = a
 378:     End Function
 379:  -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 380:  Private Function CompareFileName (ByVal Name, ByVal Filter)  (recursive)
 381:     CompareFileName = False
 382:     Dim np, fp: np = 1: fp = 1
 383:     Do
 384:        If fp > Len(Filter) Then CompareFileName = np > len(name): Exit Function
 385:        If Mid(Filter,fp) = ".*" Then     special case: ".*" at end of filter
 386:           If np > Len(Name) Then CompareFileName = True: Exit Function
 387:           End If
 388:        If Mid(Filter,fp) = "." Then      special case: "." at end of filter
 389:           CompareFileName = np > Len(Name): Exit Function
 390:           End If
 391:        Dim fc: fc = Mid(Filter,fp,1): fp = fp + 1
 392:        Select Case fc
 393:           Case "*"
 394:              CompareFileName = CompareFileName2(name,np,filter,fp)
 395:              Exit Function
 396:           Case "?"
 397:              If np <= Len(Name) And Mid(Name,np,1) <> "." Then np = np + 1
 398:           Case Else
 399:              If np > Len(Name) Then Exit Function
 400:              Dim nc: nc = Mid(Name,np,1): np = np + 1
 401:              If Strcomp(fc,nc,vbTextCompare)<>0 Then Exit Function
 402:           End Select
 403:        Loop
 404:     End Function
 405:  -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 406:  Private Function CompareFileName2 (ByVal Name, ByVal np0, ByVal Filter, ByVal fp0)
 407:     Dim fp: fp = fp0
 408:     Dim fc2
 409:     Do                                   skip over "*" and "?" characters in filter
 410:        If fp > Len(Filter) Then CompareFileName2 = True: Exit Function
 411:        fc2 = Mid(Filter,fp,1): fp = fp + 1
 412:        If fc2 <> "*" And fc2 <> "?" Then Exit Do
 413:        Loop
 414:     If fc2 = "." Then
 415:        If Mid(Filter,fp) = "*" Then      special case: ".*" at end of filter
 416:           CompareFileName2 = True: Exit Function
 417:           End If
 418:        If fp > Len(Filter) Then          special case: "." at end of filter
 419:           CompareFileName2 = InStr(np0,Name,".") = 0: Exit Function
 420:           End If
 421:        End If
 422:     Dim np
 423:     For np = np0 To Len(Name)
 424:        Dim nc: nc = Mid(Name,np,1)
 425:        If StrComp(fc2,nc,vbTextCompare)=0 Then
 426:           If CompareFileName(Mid(Name,np+1),Mid(Filter,fp)) Then
 427:              CompareFileName2 = True: Exit Function
 428:              End If
 429:           End If
 430:        Next
 431:     CompareFileName2 = False
 432:     End Function
 433:  -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 434:       
 435:  Sub SendEmailToGoogleDocs(sToEmail, sFileAttachment)
 436:   
 437:  Dim ToAddress
 438:  Dim MessageSubject
 439:  Dim MessageBody
 440:  Dim MessageAttachment
 441:  Dim newMail
 442:   
 443:   
 444:   
 445:  Set oCheckFile = oFso.GetFile(sFileAttachment)
 446:  if oCheckFile.Size > iGoogleDocsSizeLimit then
 447:  File is too large
 448:    output.WriteLine sFileAttachment & " could not be sent to Google Docs. " & _
"It is too large (limit 500KB). File Size: "
& oCheckFile.Size/1024 & "KB"
 449:  else
 450:   
 451:      ToAddress = sToEmail
 452:      MessageSubject = oFso.GetFileName(sFileAttachment)
 453:      MessageBody = ""
 454:   
 455:          
 456:          
 457:          Select Case EmailSendMethod 
 458:          
 459:          Case 1
 460:                Send EMail using MAPI
 461:                
 462:            Set ol = WScript.CreateObject("Outlook.Application")
 463:            Set ns = ol.getNamespace("MAPI")
 464:            ns.logon "","",true,false
 465:             
 466:            Set newMail = ol.CreateItem(olMailItem)
 467:            newMail.Subject = MessageSubject
 468:            newMail.Body = MessageBody &vbCrLf
 469:            
 470:            MessageAttachment = sFileAttachment
 471:            newMail.Attachments.Add(MessageAttachment).Displayname = _
                                             oFso.GetFileName(sFileAttachment)
 472:            
 473:             validate the recipient, just in case…
 474:            Set myRecipient = ns.CreateRecipient(ToAddress)
 475:            myRecipient.Resolve
 476:            
 477:            If Not myRecipient.Resolved Then
 478:                output.WriteLine  sToEmail & _
" is an Unknown recipient, cannot send email with " & sFileAttachment
 479:            Else
 480:               newMail.Recipients.Add(myRecipient)
 481:               newMail.Send
 482:                     if bVerbose = true then
 483:                            output.WriteLine "Email for Google Docs for " & _
                                 sFileAttachment & " was created in our Outlook Outbox folder."
 484:                   end if                     
 485:            End If
 486:        
 487:            Set ol = Nothing
 488:          Case 2
 489:          Send EMail Using CDO
 490:            msgType  = 0 
 491:          
 492:              Set newMail = Wscript.CreateObject("CDO.Message")
 493:      newMail.To = sToEmail
 494:              newMail.From = sToEmail
 495:              newMail.Subject = MessageSubject
 496:              if msgType = TEXTMSG then
 497:            newMail.TextBody = MessageBody &vbCrLf
 498:              else
 499:             newMail.HTMLBody = MessageBody &vbCrLf
 500:              end if
 501:              newMail.AddAttachment  sFileAttachment
 502:             if bVerbose = true then
 503:                output.WriteLine "Email for Google Docs for " & sFileAttachment & _
                     " was sent via CDO"
 504:             end if                     
 505:              
 506:             
 507:        newMail.Configuration.Fields.Item _
 508:              ("http://schemas.microsoft.com/cdo/configuration/sendusing") = 2
 509:        newMail.Configuration.Fields.Item _
 510:              ("http://schemas.microsoft.com/cdo/configuration/smtpserver") =
 511:        newMail.Configuration.Fields.Item _
 512:              ("http://schemas.microsoft.com/cdo/configuration/smtpserverport") = 25
 513:        newMail.Configuration.Fields.Update
 514:          
 515:   
 516:          newMail.Send
 517:   
 518:          set newMail = Nothing
 519:   
 520:      End Select
 521:          
 522:  end if
 523:   
 524:  End Sub     
 525:   
 526:  ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 527:  Sub ForceCscript(bForceRelance) 
 528:  Force to reload the program in non interactive mode 
 529: If (right(Ucase(WScript.FullName),11)="WSCRIPT.EXE") and bForceRelance Then 
 530:   Dim WshShell,args,objArgs,argname, I , sFullCall
 531:   Set WshShell = CreateObject("WScript.Shell") 
 532:   args="" 
 533:   If Wscript.Arguments.Count > 0 Then 
 534:    Set objArgs = Wscript.arguments.Unnamed 
 535:    For I = 0 to objArgs.Count - 1
 536:       if instr(objArgs(I)," ") > 0 then
 537:         args = args & " """ & objArgs(I) & """"
 538:       else 
 539:        args = args & " " & objArgs(I)
 540:       end if         
 541:    Next 
 542:    For each argname in Wscript.arguments.Named 
 543:       if instr(Wscript.arguments.Named.Item(argname)," ") > 0 then
 544:          args = args & " /" & argname & ":""" & Wscript.arguments.Named.Item(argname) & """"
 545:       else
 546:          if Wscript.arguments.Named.Item(argname) = "" then
 547:                  args = args & " /" & argname 
 548:           else
 549:                args = args & " /" & argname & ":" & Wscript.arguments.Named.Item(argname)
 550:           end if        
 551:       end if
 552:    Next
 553:   End If
 554:   sFullCall =  WshShell.ExpandEnvironmentStrings("%COMSPEC%") & " /C cscript.exe """ & _
Wscript.ScriptFullName & """" & args
 555:   
 556:   WshShell.Run  sFullCall,1,False 
 557:   Set WshShell = Nothing 
 558:   WScript.Quit 
 559:  End If 
 560:  End Sub 
 561:   
 562:  =======================================================================
 563:   *** MAIN **************************************
 564:  =======================================================================
 565:   
 566:   
 567:   
 568:   
 569:  set output = wscript.stdout
 570:  bVerbose = arguments.Named.Exists("verbose") Or arguments.Named.Exists("v")
 571:   
 572:  Call EchoUsage()
 573:  Call CheckArgs()
 574:   
 575:  Set ofso = CreateObject("Scripting.FileSystemObject")
 576:  Set owdo = CreateObject("Word.Application")
 577:  Set owdocs = owdo.Documents
 578:   
 579:  sFolder= ""
 580:   
 581:  if not arguments.Named.Exists("dir") then
 582:     Single Document Conversion
 583:     Call DOC2PDF( arguments.Unnamed.Item(0), arguments.Named.Item("o") )
 584:  else
 585:     Batch Conversion
 586:     sFolder = arguments.Named.Item("dir")
 587:     if right(sFolder,1) = "\" then
 588:      sFolder = left(sFolder, Len(sFolder)-1)
 589:     end if 
 590:   
 591:     if Not oFso.FolderExists(sFolder)  then
 592:        output.WriteLine  "Error: Input Folder for Batch Processing does not exist!"
 593:     else
 594:        WScript.Echo sFolder & "\" & arguments.Unnamed.Item(0)
 595:         aFiles = ListDir(sFolder & "\" & arguments.Unnamed.Item(0))
 596:         If UBound(aFiles) = -1 then
 597:            output.WriteLine  "No files found."
 598:         end if
 599:         For Each FileName In aFiles 
 600:            Call DOC2PDF(FileName,"")  
 601:         Next
 602:     end if
 603:   
 604:  end if
 605:   
 606:  owdo.Quit WdDoNotSaveChanges
 607:  Set owdo = Nothing
 608:  Set arguments = Nothing
 609:  Set oFso = Nothing
 610:          

Labels: ,

VNV Nation's Illusion, Online Video and Ronan Harris

I mentioned it on several occasions that the VNV Nation, a British EBM/Industrial act, is my favorite band for several years now. Several things happened to me recently, which are related to VNV Nation and interesting enough to write about them publicly, so here we go.

DollfaceINTERA Coincidental Marriage Made in Heaven

Somebody else mixed the song "Illusion" by VNV Nation with the video "Doll Face" by Andy Huang (Andrew Thomas Huang), then still with Root Film, and uploaded it to YouTube.com over one year ago. It is now approaching the 900,000 views mark.

I re-edited and uploaded the video under my account (kind of a dupe), just to make sure that it is there and not getting lost. I also changed the intro and end credits to pay all necessary dues to the respective parties appropriately. I updated the audio too, replacing it with a high quality rip from the album, while I was at it. The main video is based on the original QuickTime file of the "Doll Face" animation. The music and video seem to be made for each other and fit perfect.

The video is also available for download in .AVI format (XVID, Lame MP3) via MediaFire.com here. CDatAmazon

Although it is not one of my favorite VNV Nation songs, I cannot deny that it touched me nevertheless.Another interesting part about this video is that it got the attention by Ronan Harris from VNV Nation himself, who did not pull the video, because of copyright infringement and tried to get in contact with the animation creator Andy Huang from Los Angeles, California instead.

They met in October 2008 and plan to work on some new projects together in the future. This video, although not officially a VNV music video was silently acknowledged and approved, used now for viral marketing on the Internet. It contains credits for the creators after all.

Buy the VNV Nation album Judgement at Amazon.com Ronan Harris, "Mr.VNV Nation" also wrote about this video at his MySpace blog earlier this month. The song "Illusion" was not released as a single and is only available on the 2007 VNV Nation album "Judgement" (track number 8), published in the United States by Metropolis Records.

To learn more about VNV Nation, visit their official web site at VNVNation.com or their MySpace page at MySpace.com/VNVNation, which is maintained by Ronan Harris personally.

Two Way Communication with my Favorite Band

How do I know about all this? Well, I contacted Ronan via MySpace.com about the video, without knowing that he was already aware of it. I told him not to have the video pulled (because that was not my intention), but to contact Andy, get permission to use the video for an official music video and release the song with this video as an official single. I am an Internet marketer, who also spent some time on online video now, so I kind of knew quite a bit what I was talking about. It was not just amateurish Blah Blah.

Ronan was already working on getting in personal contact with Andy and had already a meeting with him arranged during the short VNV Nation West Coast tour in October/November 2008, where Ronan also worked as DJ for a special event in Los Angeles.

Ronan decided not to pursue the idea of releasing the song as single, which I still believe is a mistake. It has the material for mainstream success and would maybe top the commercial success of the VNV Nation single "Genesis", which made it to number 67 in the German Media Control Charts, along with making it to number 1 in the German Alternative Charts (DAC).

If you like the music, you can buy the "Judgement" album by VNV Nation, which was published by Metropolis Records in the United States in April 2007 via Amazon.com here.

vnvbanner-1

I had some email communication with Ronan where he mentioned that he is looking into doing more with online video, but thinks that it is to costly and too hard to do. I sent him a long response where I encouraged him to do more online video and also provided some tips and suggestions for the content that he could produce and debunked the myth that video production cost for online video are high and not affordable.

Buy the Pastperfect DVD video by VNV Nation at Amazon.com I did not get a response to this email yet, Ronan was also on the road, but I hope that he will check some of my suggestions and moves ahead with this idea. I also bugged him about an official VNV Nation Live album, which still does not exist.

Okay, there is the "Pastperfect" Live DVD from 2004 and I ripped the music to burn it on a music CD. That is not perfectly legal, but Mark Jackson from VNV Nation personally suggested to me to do this, back in 2005.

Pastperfect Touches of the Past

Talking about the Pastperfect DVD by VNV Nation, which you can get here btw. The spelling as one word, rather than "Past Perfect", which would be grammatically correct, was done intentionally by VNV Nation, just FYI. ...

I put months ago the DVD intro up on YouTube, which is a cool Metropolis-Style like animation, very short, only 1:30 minutes in length, but pretty cool.

DVDatAmazon You can download this video in AVI format at MediaFire.com here.

VNV Nation, Ronan Harris and Mark Jackson The Metropolis-Style animation was created by the German Media Agency "Raumgleiter" and the great epic music is a remix of the classic "Romeo and Juliet (Julia) - Suite No. 2: Montagues and Capulets", composed by Sergej Prokofieff (1891-1953) (also spelled Prokofiev) in 1936.

I learned all that, when I did some research about it, after another YouTube.com user asked me about the music.

It was true, the music was not typical VNV Nation stuff and sounded familiar, but I did not really think about it, until it was brought up recently. I thought that it is an interesting fact to share.

I also recommend checking out the 3:48 minutes long DVD trailer/promo video for the "Pastperfect" DVD from 2003, which is pretty cool too and also uses some of the video footage from the DVD intro video. It is also available for download in AVI format via MediaFire.com, here.

Enough of EBM/Industrial music and VNV Nation for today :)

Cheers!

Carsten aka Roy/SAC

Labels: , ,

Dancing Around the World, Paid For, Everything Inclusive

If you did not hear about Matt Harding yet, then it is about time. He is the guy that became famous for "dancing on the Internet", okay, there are a bunch of guys that are "famous" doing that, but he is the one who did it in public at places around the whole globe.

 mattdanceani The story goes like this...

  1. A 32 year old deadbeat who was born in Connecticut, USA and ended up working for a company in Brisbane, Australia decided in 2003 to quit his job and use the money he had saved to do a trip through Asia until he was broke.
  2. During the usual posing for tourist photo graphs and home videos as proof for his friends and family that he was at the places he said he was, a friend suggested to do his funny dance, the only dance Matt knows and do that instead of the usual boring posing.
  3. mattdancingani2 He did that for the rest of his trip until he ran out of money. He published his short videos on a web site that he mainly created for his family to check what he was doing and where.
  4. The stuff went somehow "viral" on the Internet thanks to social media. It also caught the attention of a company called Stride Gum, who thought that doing more of this kind of videos sponsored by the Stride Gum brand would be a fantastic idea. Matt thought so too, especially when he was told that Stride pays for the whole thing, everything inclusive.
  5. The result is his second video, which made him even more famous.
  6. Seeing one dude dancing alone got kind of old when Matt had an idea. How about having people dancing with him, people who contacted Matt over the Internet. Stride thought too that it is a great idea and off he was for the third trip around the globe.
  7. That video is the 2008 video  and made Matt even more famous. So famous in fact that he was asked to talk at social media conferences etc.

His 2006 and 2008 videos were viewed over 11 Million times EACH on YouTube alone! "Nicht schlecht Herr Specht" as we say in Germany to something like that.

Here are some interesting facts about the locations that Matt visited.

Three videos were released, labeled 2005, 2006 and 2008. Each with the results of an entire trip lasting several months to over one year. The first video from 2005 included 20 locations, the video from 2006 included 36 and the last one from 2008 included a whopping 69 places.

There is also an out-takes video for the 2006 trip with a few locations that are unique and did not make it into the final video. That means that the actual number of places visited is higher than the ones I mentioned.

Unique Places shown in his 3 Videos

  1. Abu Simbel, Egypt
  2. Agra, India
  3. Ala Archa Gorge, Kyrgyzstan
  4. Alhambra, California
  5. Amsterdam, The Netherlands
  6. Angkor Wat, Cambodia
  7. Antseranana, Madagascar
  8. Area 51, Nevada
  9. Atlanta, Georgia
  10. Auckland, New Zealand
  11. Auki, Solomon Islands
  12. Austin, Texas
  13. Bandar Seri Begawan, Brunei
  14. Bangkok, Thailand
  15. Batik, Morocco
  16. Beijing, China
  17. Bengal Jungle, India
  18. Berlin, Germany
  19. Brisbane, Australia
  20. Brussels, Belgium
  21. Buenos Aires, Argentina
  22. Cape of Good Hope, South Africa
  23. Chakachino, Zambia
  24. Chicago, Illinois
  25. Christmas Island, Australia
  26. Chuuk, Micronesia
  27. Cologne, Germany
  28. Delhi, India
  29. Demilitarized Zone, Korea
  30. Dubai, United Arab Emirates
  31. Dublin, Ireland
  32. East Jerusalem, West Bank
  33. Easter Island, Chile
  34. Ephesus, Turkey
  35. Galapagos Islands, Ecuador
  36. Giant's causeway, Northern Ireland
  37. Guam
  38. Gurgaon, India
  39. Half Moon Caye, Belize
  40. Hanoi, Vietnam
  41. Haute-Picardie, France
  42. Impenetrable Forest, Uganda
  43. Istanbul, Turkey
  44. Kilimanjaro Summit, Tanzania
  45. Kjeragbolten, Norway
  46. Kuwait City, Kuwait
  47. Lancelin, Australia
  48. Lemur Island, Madagascar
  49. Lisbon, Portugal
  50. Lisse, The Netherlands
  51. London, England
  52. Los Angeles, California
  53. Luang Prabang, Laos
  54. Machu Picchu, Peru
  55. Madrid, Spain
  56. Mexico City, Mexico
  57. Miami, Florida
  58. Mokolodi, Botswana
  59. Monte Alban, Mexico
  60. Montreal, Quebec
  61. Monument Valley, Arizona
  62. Moscow, Russia
  63. Mulindi, Rwanda
  64. Mumbai, India
  65. Munich, Germany
  66. Mutianyu, China
  67. Neko Harbor, Antarctica
  68. Nellis Airspace, Nevada
  69. New York, New York
  70. Panama Canal, Panama
  71. Paris, France
  72. Paro, Bhutan
  73. Petra, Jordan
  74. Poria, Papua New Guinea
  75. Prague, Czech Republic
  76. Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
  77. Rock Islands, Palau
  78. Routeburn Valley, New Zealand
  79. Salar de Uyuni, Bolivia
  80. San Francisco, California
  81. Sana'a, Yemen
  82. Sao Paulo, Brazil
  83. Seattle, Washington
  84. Seljalandsfoss, Iceland
  85. Seoul, South Korea
  86. Siberia, Russia
  87. Singapore
  88. Sossusvlei, Namibia
  89. South Shetland Islands
  90. Soweto, South Africa
  91. Stockholm, Sweden
  92. Stone Town, Zanzibar
  93. Suhbaatar, Mongolia
  94. Sydney, Australia
  95. Tagaytay, The Philippines
  96. Taipaei, Taiwan
  97. Tel Aviv, Israel
  98. Teotihuacan, Mexico
  99. Thimphu, Bhutan
  100. Tikal, Guatemala
  101. Timbuktu, Mali
  102. Tokyo, Japan
  103. Tongatapu, Tonga
  104. Tsavo, Kenya
  105. Vancouver, British Columbia
  106. Vava'u, Tonga
  107. Venice, Italy
  108. Very Large Array, New Mexico
  109. Wadi Rum, Jordan
  110. Wainivilase, Fiji
  111. Warsaw, Poland
  112. Washington D.C., USA
  113. Westport, Connecticut
  114. Yangon, Myanmar

Unique Countries of Islands

  1. Antarctica
  2. Argentina
  3. Australia
  4. Belgium
  5. Belize
  6. Bhutan
  7. Bolivia
  8. Botswana
  9. Brazil
  10. Brunei
  11. Cambodia
  12. Canada
  13. Chile
  14. China
  15. Czech Republic
  16. Ecuador
  17. Egypt
  18. Fiji
  19. France
  20. Germany
  21. Guam
  22. Guatemala
  23. Iceland
  24. India
  25. Ireland
  26. Israel
  27. Italy
  28. Japan
  29. Jordan
  30. Kenya
  31. Kuwait
  32. Kyrgyzstan
  33. Laos
  34. Madagascar
  35. Mali
  36. Mexico
  37. Micronesia
  38. Mongolia
  39. Morocco
  40. Myanmar
  41. Namibia
  42. New Zealand
  43. Norway
  44. Palau
  45. Palestine
  46. Panama
  47. Papua New Guinea
  48. Peru
  49. Poland
  50. Portugal
  51. Russia
  52. Rwanda
  53. Solomon Islands
  54. South Africa
  55. South Korea
  56. Spain
  57. Sweden
  58. Taiwan
  59. Tanzania
  60. Thailand
  61. The Netherlands
  62. The Philippines
  63. Tonga
  64. Turkey
  65. Uganda
  66. UK
  67. United Arab Emirates
  68. USA
  69. Vietnam
  70. Yemen
  71. Zambia
  72. Zanzibar

Places he visited Twice

  1. Brisbane, Australia
  2. London, England
  3. Los Angeles, California
  4. San Francisco, California
  5. Sydney, Australia
  6. Tokyo, Japan*

Places he visited on every trip

  1. New York, New York
  2. Seattle, Washington

 

*Tokyo actually appears three times in his videos, but only in two of them and not three. Tokyo is the only real duplicate within any of his videos. Tokyo appears twice in the 2008 video. Once in location #29 and the second time in location #42.

Also, if you look at the overall data, he rarely made it to the same place twice. 8 places that he visited more than once, out of 114. ... not bad.

Link to my megamix video  on YouTube, also available for download in .AVI (XVID/MP3) format and 640x480 resolution via Mediafire.com at this URL.

gnomdex8 Here is a link to Matt's presentation at the 2008 Gnomdex conference, which was held between August 21 and 23, 2008 in Seattle, WA, where he talks about what he did and how he did it to travel around the world not only once or twice, but three times. Once on his own expense and twice on somebody else's.

Gnomedex is by the way the tech- or geek-conference organized by Chris Pirillo, who is also notoriously known for his online video stuff and live chat.

What is odd to me now is the fact that just when I decided to write this post about Matt, his web site went offline. WhereTheHellIsMatt.com does not resolve at all. There is a cached version of the site in Google, with a date of either November 8 or 9, so the site was up about a week ago. I hope that this down-time is only a temporary glitch. However, if I would be Matt, I would have a word with the hosting company (unless that company happens to be the sponsor for his web site hosting hehe)

I put up the link to his web site anyway, hoping that it will be up very soon.

Other Links

Cheers!

Carsten aka Roy/SAC

Labels: , , ,

Kooza DVD and Cirque C&D Letter

This is my first post, using the Windows Live Writer application. It's a free tool by Microsoft to make blog posts, supporting various blogging platforms beyond Windows Live Spaces. It was able to determine the blog layout and I can now see right when I type this, how it will probably look on the site. Another important feature, which made me giving Live Writer a shot, is the nice image upload feature via FTP. If all goes well, images that I insert here into the editor should be transferred over to my web server and the post in Blogger should refer to the images web URL instead of the local file on my hard-drive. Lets see how it works out :).

They have a dedicated web site, an open SDK  and a gallery with already 97 plug-ins available for download and use with the new Writer tool. I was able to configure the Writer for this blog (using classic Blogger with FTP to push to my servers), with SearchEngineJournal.com (WordPress), but not with ReveNews.com. I think that the problem with ReveNews.com has not to do with the Writer, but the configuration of the ReveNews.com blog itself, which is also using WordPress, like SEJ, where it worked instantly.

Post Reason No. 1

Okay, but this is not the reason for my post. There are actually two much more significant reasons. Lets start with the first, which is much simpler and explained in no time, compared with reason number two.

cirquedusoleil-kooza-dvd-box I got today my 2 discs DVD set of the recording of the Cirque du Soleil show "Kooza". I ordered it on the weekend and paid $12 or so for express shipping. The shipping was really express, which justifies the high shipping charge. The DVD itself cost $29.00. It seems to be expensive, but you actually get a lot of stuff for your bucks, so I'd say that the price is fair. You can only buy it via the Cirque Boutique online as far as I can tell.

I stumbled across the DVD by accident. I didn't see any promotion for it (including nothing on the Cirque web site itself) or anything like that. I noticed it when I compared the DVD offers in the Cirque Boutique for shoppers from the United States to the ones for shoppers from India. Why I did that will be explained in reason two a bit later. Well, that also means that I don't know when the DVD was actually released, because I didn't see any preview, announcement or advertisement for it. It cannot be for long be available though, because it is not available via Amazon.com yet. Assuming that the delay for appearing in Amazon.com is the same as it was for the Kooza soundtrack, then it must have been released sometimes last week.

What do you get for your money?

CirqueDuSoleil-Kooza-DVD-Case-tn

I mentioned already that you get a lot for your money. DVD 1 contains only the main show, which is about 2 hours in length. Audio is available in Surround, Dolby Digital 5.1 and DTS 5.1. The show was filmed with 8 cameras during its run in Toronto Canada. The second DVD contains the entire 47 minutes long documentary "A Thrilling Ride Through Kooza", which was/is sold separately for several months already. This documentary itself cost already $19.00!

Also included are an about 11 minutes long documentary about the Wheel of Death act, some promotional advertisements for other Cirque products and the DVD credits. Altogether over 3 hours of content in high definition and superb sound quality. Subtitles are also available in multiple languages, including Spanish and French. The DVDs come in a custom made box cover, which did not fit in its entirely on my scanner. But you will get the idea, I hope :).

Post Reason No. 2

Click Here Button

Now it is getting serious, so hold on tight and bear with me please :).

If you noticed and wondered, why many of my past blog posts were changed and include this ugly button where there used to be videos embedded, I will now explain why that I did it and you will hopefully understand and forgive me.

I received a bit over one week ago a Cease and Desist letter by Cirque du Soleil. I am not kidding here, this is real, I swear. You can see the actual letterin PDF format here. See for yourself.

It was written politely. They obviously don't like that I promote their business and help them to make more revenue and more profits (I am still not kidding).  Before I responded to them, I did contact the Social Media Manager for Cirque du Soleil, Jessica Berlin, who is located in Las Vegas, Nevada. I had contact with Jessica in the past, first through my old YouTube.com account and then through my CirqueDuSoleilGuru account. Jessica manages the CirqueLasVegas account on YouTube and we bumped into each other, because she was literally spamming many of my Cirque du Soleil related videos (no joke). She knew what I was doing, appreciated it, and even gave comments and made suggestions.

cirquecamdd

So I forwarded the email from her colleagues to Jessica, assuming that there was an error made or some rookie at the Montreal office does not know anything about social media and what is going on the Internet these days.

My email to her looked like this quote (excerpt only):

Could you please explain to your colleagues what social media is and that they fight an up-hill battle, if they try to prevent people from taking their brand and run with it by force?

I do it publicly as a fan and do tons of advertising and more for free and honest, It's a promotion that you cannot buy for any money in the world. I answer questions of people and cannot remember getting any negative feedback ever. Since I am a fan and not a hater of the Cirque, I try to present the Cirque in its best light possible. I never claimed to work on behalf of the Cirque. I am also open to comments and suggestions, like the one you did for the "Believe" video, where you thought that I was not clear enough expressing that this is not an official Cirque du Soleil released video. If you try to force, regulate and control what people think and interpret by using threats and citing inadequate and outdated laws, two things will happen.

  1. you lose support and might even turn your best friends into your worst foes
  2. people will not stop doing what they do (the genie is out of the bottle), they will only close all communication channels and use the protection of anonymity, removing the option for you to guide and support and to maintain at least some control over the message that is send out to people.

What is the point in doing that? It does not make sense at all, personally and also from the business point of view.

I understand that there are some ethical limits what some other people do not. I don't publish full DVD or CD rips of Cirque du Soleil shows for example, although I still believe that this does not hurt you guys that much really, unless the CD/DVD business became bigger than show ticket sales. I stated at my blog and YouTube channel, that the best recording of a show, Multi-Angle, High Definition (HD), 5.1 Surround Sound etc. is no substitute for watching a show live. It's like watching a roller-coaster ride on TV... it gives you a glimpse, but you have to experience it yourself to get the full package.

You are allowed to forward this and also any previous email communication to other folks at Cirque du Soleil, including the two ladies below. I hereby give you officially the permission to do so.

I have 10 days to respond to the notice. I will wait with my response until Wednesday and hope to hear back from you before then. It gives you over two working days to discuss this subject with your colleagues internally and to make a decision.

I wrote in March an Article titled "Social Media Guide for Big Brand Businesses" for Search Engine Journal, which was well received. I suggest to you and your colleagues to read it.

http://www.searchenginejournal.com/social-media-guide-for-big-brand-corporate-businesses/6604/

I got a response from Jessica a few days later (I got the C&D letter on a Friday, just to mention it). She wrote:

Thank you for forwarding this.  I think this has come about primarily because of the DVD content that is hosted on your sites.  I understand your frustrations with this but Cirque has always upheld a very firm policy that no more than three minutes of content is able to be used without having to pay for rights to the footage.  Usually we have media (both traditional and 2.0) sign a release form for the use of any footage.  Social media is still relatively new territory for us but we still need to enforce our brand standards in all mediums.

I know you are a huge fan and we truly appreciate your help in promoting the shows.  In order to be able to continue working together, I hope you will respect the guidelines.

So I changed the posts on my blog and responded to the original email with the C&D letter attached to it, before the 10 days time-limit was up:

Sorry for the delayed response, but I was busy. Well, the set 10 days are not over yet, so I am still acting within the accepted limits.

There are no possibly infringing Cirque du Soleil videos hosted or embedded at RoySAC.com or any other web sites that I operate anymore, as you requested.

What remains is material provided by partners with whom I am affiliated with, including Amazon.com and MGM or meet the criteria of fair use within the acceptable limits of news reporting and/or expression of my personal opinion, which is still perfectly legal in this country.Let me know, if you have questions or refute my claims for the remaining content on my web sites.

I followed the demands made in the C&D by the letter, not a bit more and, I honestly believe, no less either.

This makes things look a little bit odd now, because the videos are still there and not removed from the planet earth of course. I did this on purpose, to make a point.

I would make a bet that the three minutes length limitation, specified by their internal policies, is based on the use for traditional media, including Television but also high definition ads on DVDs, including their own DVDs. Signing a release form applies also to traditional media (which includes large Web 2.0 publishers), but not to social media (video sharing).

The Cirque would have to hire a lot more staff and new servers (web and/or email servers), if they want every guy on the planet who decides to make a fan video from various sources sign a release form (which they must have available in at least a few hundred of the close to 7,000 living languages in the world today, because not everybody who has a computer and Internet access is necessarily also fluent in English or French.

The 3 minutes time limit probably has also to do with the standards in the TV and Movie industry. Ad blocks on TV are often sold with a  30 seconds length. A 1 minutes Ad would take up 2 blocks. Some even use 20 seconds blocks, which would require the purchase of 3 blocks for a 1 minute Ad. Movie trailers for the theatres, TV, online movie sites (e.g. IMDB.com) or to be included on other DVD movies are usually between 20 seconds to 2:30 minutes long, max 3 minutes (oh.. surprise!). Anyway, I can only say "Leave the old rules with the old habits and get used to new rules (and maybe also new habits)"

Asking a regular guy and fan to only make videos that are no longer than 3 minutes is not only ridicules, but also stupid and to some extend even discriminating. Jessica also seems to be new to all of this. Her well meant, but poorly exercised promotional campaign for the announcement video of the new Cirque show in Vegas starring the magician "Criss Angel" (the spam that I mentioned earlier), seems to confirm my personal assumption.

I can only recommend to read my original email once more. This should help with the missing understanding a little bit. I am also open to talks, since I seem to know a little bit more about this subject then they do. Hey, I don't even charge them money for it.

Now to the complained regarding the use of DVD content for some of my videos.

The Stuff is already there, not because of me!

First, ALL Cirque du Soleil DVDs are available for free download in pirated form all over the Internet. Pick your poison, Torrents, Usenet, FTP servers or sliced up into <10 minutes pieces on YouTube. Non of those were my doing. I got tons of requests to publish extensive DVD material, which I refused politely, referring to online stores where those DVDs can be purchased for personal use. This includes Cirque Documentaries.

One Exception, for Good Reasons

There was one exception. I made one of the documentaries available non-public to a fan in India, who cannot afford to travel to Las Vegas to see the show in Person, Due to the fact that it is a resident show, no show recording of the show is available or will be available any day soon (the show "Mystère" runs for over 15 years and there is still no recording of it). The documentary "Flow" (about the Cirque show "O") is only available through the Cirque Boutique online shop. Before you are able to show the store is it necessary to specify where the items will be shipped to. If you select USA, everything is fine and pretty much the entire product catalog is accessible. Different story, if you specify India as shipping location. The number of products available  shrinks significantly. The DVD section is almost empty. Non of the documentary DVDs is available for purchase.

So the there is no legal way for somebody from India to get access to this content. I assume that the restriction for India has nothing to do with the Cirque using copyright laws to control distribution in a bad way, but logistical issues and/or the risk of and fear for credit card fraud, which is rampart in Asia and requires some sophistication to reduce the risk to an acceptable limit.

I felt sorry and uploaded the video to Google Video and sent the non-public URL to this guy in a personal email. The videos do not appear in any listings or search results on any web site though. Here are screen shots of the site, one with the DVD offerings, if you specify United States as delivery destination and another, if you set the destination to India (btw. when I made those screen shots, is when I noticed the Kooza DVD and bought it right then and there hehe).

Show Content from Documentaries

Yes, I admit that I used show content from documentaries, including the ones that are available on DVD. However, I only did it for shows, where there is no recording on DVD available (yet). I did not publish the documentary parts though, which always made up the larger part of the documentaries.

If you are a fan and live half way around the globe from the venue where a resident show is being performed, chances could be slim to zero that the person would be able to ever make it to that show in person and in his or hers lifetime.

Know your Customers and Don't Use Cheap Methods to make a Quick and Dirty Buck!

If the person is interested in the shows but not the behind the scenes stuff, trying to sell to him a documentary DVD as a quick fix is not only low, but unethical as well. There are folks (like me), who value the background info of a show, about the creation, the artists and the surroundings. Fine, for them is the DVD and I didn't publish anything that would deter any of those potential customers from buying the documentary DVDs, on the contrary actually. I mentioned in some of the videos that it contains as source material images from a documentary DVD.

I was contacted who were unaware of the existence of such DVDs and who asked me specific questions about them. Often of the nature "which one to buy", because they only had enough money for one DVD and not all of them, so they wanted to pick the best they possibly could.

The folks interested in just the shows got a nice freebie in less than High Definition quality. They wouldn't buy the DVDs for the documentaries sake of them, are unable to buy a DVD recording of the show and sometimes unable to make it to a show in person.

However, some are able to make it and appreciate the video footage to help them with their decision about, for which of the soon to be SIX Cirque du Soleil shows (plus ONE additional Cirque like show, "Le Rêve" by former Cirque director Franco Dragonè, now on his own, plating at the Wynn Las Vegas), they should get tickets for when they are visiting Las Vegas.

Many of the viewers of the videos are actually folks who already got tickets are are excited about seeing a show live and folks who just saw one the shows and are still thrilled and excited to let everybody else know about their excitement via a comment a respective video of that show in YouTube. I am not kidding, check out the comments of the Cirque Videos on YouTube yourself, if you do not believe what I am telling you.

Summary, I do not cut into the Cirque's business, I am actually supporting and promoting it, helping them to sell more show tickets and to sell DVDs to the right customers for the right reasons. I even state at the user home page of my CirqueDuSoleilGuru account the following:

REMEMBER! A VIDEO (REGARDLESS OF ITS QUALITY) IS NO SUBSTITUTE FOR A LIVE EXPERIENCE OF THE PERFORMING CIRCUS ARTS!

I did not make that up, I really mean it! The Cirque should send me a check instead of a cease and desist letter! Others would probably agree with me on this one. I try to portrait the Cirque from his best side in my videos and try to be as true to the brand as I can. At the same time I am making as clear as possible that I created (edited) the video and do not work for the Cirque. This is important because of content that I use some times, where the Cirque does not own any copyright themselves, yes, content that includes live performances by the Cirque itself (I am not kidding again and won't start with it at the end :) ).

What I Do NOT Do!

I do not publish any video recordings where artists didn't do their act successfully and fell and might got injured beyond their own pride. I am sure that not everybody is a fan of the Cirque, competitors for example. They can produce stuff as well and appear in search results for "Cirque du Soleil" or any of their show names on search engines and other web sites, like YouTube. I am sure that the Cirque would prefer if that content would be about the Cirque and not the competitors offerings and certainly not content that makes the Cirque look bad, stupid, unprofessional or unable to do their job right.

Conclusion and Wrap Up

I will send the link to this post to the folks at Cirque du Soleil in Montreal, Canada and also to Jessica in Las Vegas and hope that they will retract their C&D letter and do what I already suggested in my first email (to Jessica only, now published also publicly here at my blog). I will be in Vegas in a few days and hope to get the chance to talk with Jessica of Cirque du Soleil in person. I hope that she will appreciate all my free tips and advice that I provided and starts getting a real grip on this whole social media thing, where she was made a marketing manager for. I won't give up on the Cirque that easily. And if their is "reasoning" then there will be a solution that will work for everybody involved and can be used by the marketing folks at the Cirque for other instances like this one, where the person on the other side does not happen to be a marketer with experience in the social media space and is also a blogger (a lucky coincidence for the Cirque, I'd like to believe).

I think this post makes the top 5 list of the longest posts written for this blog. I didn't check and will stop here to avoid to be able to be sure that this must be the longest post of them all hehe.

Cheers!

Carsten aka Roy/SAC

p.s. One last thing. Did you notice the new buttons below the post to enter a comment? How do you like it? I think that it is more prominent than the old simple text links.

I have not found a way to add Blogger tags to a post yet, but there might be a plug-in. That is the only issue that I encountered with the Windows Live Writer so far. There is room for hope and happiness here :).

Labels: , ,

YouTube, Depeche Mode and Infringement of Crap

I am really mad! Things get worse more and more. I still did not have the time to write my planned article about the current issues with the existing copyright laws and their inadequacy for the real social web world of today.

I am staring since Saturday at a suspended YouTube account of mine (my main one at YouTube.com/CarstensVlog). I cannot log-in to the account to check messages etc. and all of my 160+ videos under the account are not accessible.


The "nice" thing is that YouTube did not even bother to send me a notification about this. They just suspended the account. I wrote them an Email and also sent a fax asking why my account was suspended and that they enable it again. I got a few hours earlier an email from YouTube about the removal of one of my videos due to infringing the copyright of Depeche Mode. I had six Depeche Mode videos uploaded under my account, five of them were the different music video and live versions of my favorite DM song "Never Let Me down Again". The Sixth song was the 1988 live version of "Everything Counts" at the Rose bowl in Pasadena. They were all added to my account about 9 months ago.

One of the DM videos was already taken down in March (3 months ago) where I asked YouTube who exactly claimed the copyright and requested to take the video down. I also asked to get a copy of the 72 user comments the video had acquired that I can send it to the band and ask them, if this is what they consider infringement of their copyright and harming their record, video or concert ticket sales?

YouTube was not willing (or able, or both) to provide me with those comments.

And now also the take-down of the second video and to top it all off, the suspension of my YouTube.com account. Are all my videos infringing copyrights? "No" and "Jain". The "Jain" could be made a "Yes" technically, but if a TV station grabs a promo video of somebody and airs it without asking for permission, that somebody is very unlikely to sue the TV station for copyright infringement... more of the opposite would be true, that somebody would probably be thrilled and happy. It's like writing a press release and a newspaper actually picks it up and publishes it. I am surprised that marketing material (which is intended to expose as much people as possible to) is not automatically treated like a press release, but I am not a lawyer to be able to answer that question.

Guess what, YouTube, who is quick to take crap down without checking is always slow when it comes to responding to the inquiries and communication of the content publisher. This is not the first time. YouTube took down in the past a video from a different YouTube account of mine on behalf of a company who did not own any rights on the video at all. The video recording of the MS DOS PC demo was released under what we call today "creative commons", but without using the legal gibberish. Back when it was released, creative commons did not yet exist as far as I know. In that case YouTube did also not bother to respond to or put the video back up. I re-uploaded it again with a nasty message to the ownership-thief to check first that you really own anything about a video before you claim it to be your own.

I am also mad at Depeche Mode, who I expected to know better than this.I used to be a MySpace friend of the band and sent them a long message via the MySpace mail system yesterday. They have probably their henchmen reading the messages for them and give a crap about the rant and unhappiness of a 22 years long fan of the band. At least Ronan from VNV Nation is reading and responding to his messages personally. I also talked to Ronan and Mark from VNV about copyright stuff and they are much more realistic and relaxed about this.

I will now post my message to Depeche Mode that I sent yesterday at MySpace, before I removed myself from their MySpace Friends list.

Subject: Disappointed and Pissed off, thank you and well done

I made all video versions of my favorite song of yours "Never let me down again" available on YouTube in shitty 320x240 resolution. I took it from ALL your concert and singles DVDs that I own. I also added some personal comments and details to the description to express my support and love for you.

The videos attracted many comments and multiple discussions and sharing of memories and experiences. Really good and heartwarming stuff.

On April 25, 2008 was the first video taken down, the 1987 singles version, after being up for over 6 months and attracting 72 comments (real comments, no junk and no spam). YouTube stated that "Depeche Mode" was claiming the material being infringing.

I am sure that you never looked at the published video yourself. I even doubt that your henchmen look at the stuff and simply filtered videos by name.

Yesterday was the live version from 2005 taken down (Touring the Angel, Live in Milan). That is not all, my account at YouTube was suspended yesterday too, My account with over 160+ videos and only 6 of those were Depeche Mode videos. Now all of my videos are inaccessible. I did not get an email about the suspension. The last email that I got was the info that "Depeche Mode" claimed that the video (Never Let me down again, Live 2005) is infringing and taken down.

This is f(self-censored)king* great!!!

*I don't use the "f" word lightly; it’s the second time within the past 12 months actually. The last time before now was when I got my Green Card after living for over 7 years in the United States, with a short break, where I was forced to leave the country, because I ran out of a visa because it reached and exceeded its maximum lifespan... I wanted to let you know this to put things into the right perspective.

What do you think was happening to your content? Do you seriously believe that you lost any album sales, let alone concert ticket sales as a result of the fan postings of low resolution videos of a song of yours on a video sharing site?

Looking at the responses and comments, I'd say it did the opposite. You probably had album, video and ticket sales as a result of this. I was asked to post other songs and versions of your music. I only did it for one song, the Everything Counts version of 101. I declined the other requests and responded with the info which DVD the song is on and where to get it.

I cannot believe it that I was a fan of yours since 1986 when I was still living in East Germany and thought that it will be the end of the world, because I could not get a ticket to your one concert in East Berlin in 1987 (at the Werner Seelenbinder Halle) and believed that I would never be able to see you live. Well, fortunately for me the Berlin Wall did come down 2 years later. Who’d known? A friend of mine spent the equivalent of over 4 months salary of an average East German worker to buy off a ticket from one of the guys who got a ticket. My friend was 14 t that time, I was 13. The tickets to that concert were not sold. They were given for the most part to schools and they gave it to "exemplary" good students (Depeche Mode fan or not). Most of your real fans never had a chance to get a ticket. They had to buy it off from the "good" students for small fortunes. Not many had that kind of money, I certainly didn't even own 4 months of salary of an adult at that time.

What I have (and still have, shipped from Germany to California) is the original and only published Vinyl record with Depeche Mode songs in East Germany by "Amiga". You have no idea how hard it was to get that.

But all that is now past and you could file it under teenage stupidity or whatever you want. I am now thinking about throwing away all my Cd's and DVDs and even that damn Amiga Vinyl record of yours, considering your attitude towards your fans who do nothing more than evangelize your music and promote your albums, videos and concerts by publishing low quality version of your music and concert videos.

Good Job.

I will now remove you from my MySpace friends; however, I always had an open profile that allows messages to be sent to me, even if you are not a friend of mine.

It does probably also not matter, because I don't think that any of you even bother to read your own emails and have just another henchman do it for you and file this message under "rants"... done, thank you very much. We appreciate your damn money and business, but give a crap about you and your stupid personal problems with us.

Bye
a former Depeche Mode Fan.
1986 (starting with "A Question of Time") to 2008 (ending with infringing on your shit)


So... that was that. Now I still have to battle with YouTube to get my account back up again. That I am not just full of s... and make up an issue where there isn't one can be seen, if you have a look what else is going on at YouTube and other social media sharing sites. The Prince vs. Radiohead incident for example speaks volumes, all by itself.

I will not go further into details with this post. There is a lot more to say and to point out to make you understand the whole extend of this problem. I got to start working on my post, dang it. :)

There is only one last thing that I would like to mention. The purpose of the Copyright law is to protect content producers from rip-offs and not getting paid for their work appropriately when they should. It also prevents the commercial exploit of somebody’s intellectual and creative property, leaving the creator out of it. The law does not exist to be self serving. If a law is either not sufficient to do what it was created for or if it harms somebody else or does not cover relevant scenarios that are becoming norm and not exception, then a change of that laws become necessary or they will create more and more harm and less and less good.


Carsten aka Roy/SAC

Labels: , ,

Nobody will get killed at Affiliate Summit, WTF?

I decided to make this post at my personal blog and not at ReveNews.com or Search Engine Journal. This story is definitely not worth it and getting more people spending time on it than there already are does not help anybody or chances anything. I also "nofollowed" a bunch of links in the post to prevent that I pass any SEO value to those content, if this is only a dirty "link baiting" scam.

I wanted to leave a comment at Shoemoney's blog, but he disabled comments for some reasons. I wasn't aware of the post and the discussions that surrounded it a few weeks ago, because I was busy with getting my two laptops up and running again.

Let me take a step back and tell you about the background story of this a little bit. I was at Affiliate Summit West 2008 in Las Vegas in February and had a great time. There was obviously an incident at the ShareASale "Under the stars" party at the Palms hotel and casino that I was not aware of. I was at the party, but did not notice what was going there at one point in time, which had to do with the behavior of some of the guests at that party.

There were some kids from an upstart company, including its CEO and co-founders, called Tatto Media (yes, only one "o", it's an intended typo) who had a few drinks too much and started sexual harass some of the women at the party, which is illegal in the United States. The guys were eventually kicked out of the place and that was it.

The sinners and 2007 Finalists: Best Young Entrepreneurs by BusinessWeek; Lee Brown, 23; Lucas Brown, 23; Lin Miao, 20 years old of Tatto Media.

Details emerged later, after the event at the ABestWeb affiliate marketing forums (a thread with the title "Tatto Media - Idiots at Sagamore/Shareasale Party"), where several eyewitnesses stated their experience and opinion about the inappropriate behavior of those young men.

The boys are obviously famous and nominated for a Business Week award for entrepreneurs and start-up companies, which created an even bigger backlash for them. To make a long story short, Shawn Collins, co-founder of Affiliate Summit stepped in and stated that this company is banned from all future Affiliate Summit events. That might be a bit too harsh the one or the other might say, but that is not what I wanted to debate about today.

Following the discussion was a blog post by Jeremy Shoemaker at his blog Shoemoney.com with the title "How Long until Someone Is Killed at an Affiliate Summit". Those are very strong words. Jeremy who did not attend this Affiliate Summit talked about this incident and claims that this event attracts all the scum and thugs of the affiliate marketing industry, which makes the whole event not only unpleasant, but dangerous, where you have to fear for your health and life, on top of that.

The statements he made seem to be the living proof of the existence of parallel universes, because the event he describes is by no means the event that I encountered three times already. I didn't only feel safe, but also in good company. I met many new and pleasant people and did not come across any of the thugs and scoundrels Jeremy was talking about.

Some others made similar contradicting statements in the comments of Jeremy's blog post while comments were still open. I could not understand why Jeremy would make such statements in public, knowing that he causes direct damage to the reputation of the whole event and not only deter potential attendees, but also casts just another negative shadow over the industry as a whole as if we did not have enough problems already.

I thought that Jeremy did not attend Affiliate Summit because of the overlap with the SMX West event in Santa Clara. I decided for Affiliate Summit versus SMX and thought that he decided for SMX. This is obviously not the case and things seem to be running a bit deeper.

I have a feeling that the story with Wickedfire forums from early February plays a role in all this. Jon, the owner of the forums did a rant about "super affiliates" like John Chow, Amit Mehta, Zac Johnson and specifically Jeremy Shoemaker, titled "John Chow, Shoemoney, Super Affiliate Mindset Camels".

The write-up was bad enough to cause Jeremy to involve his legal counsel and send out a Cease and Desist letter to Jon Fisher (You can learn more about that at the Geekcast podcast from February 2008, Shoemoney vs. WickedFire and the cease and desist order of Jeremy against Jon Fisher.). I don't know for sure and have no hard evidence to back it up, but I cannot get rid of that feeling that tells me that this must have something to do with what Jeremy wrote.

I only fail to be able to make the connection between Jon Fisher from Wickedfire and Shawn Collins or Missy Ward from Affiliate Summit that would be reason enough for Jeremy for trying to damage the Affiliate Summit conference as a whole.

For everybody out there who comes across this post of mine and read the post by Jeremy, I can tell that fear to attend Affiliate Summit is completely unnecessary and not warranted. As in every big city are there places and people you don't want to surround yourself with, if you prefer to stay out of trouble, but to avoid this is a choice everybody has to make for himself. I am looking forward to the next Affiliate Summit, August 10 - 12, 2008 at the Seaport Hotel in Boston, MA.

Cheers!

Carsten aka Roy/SAC

Labels: ,

Googlefight - Karsten vs Carsten

I stumbled across a funny gimmick tool via the John Andrew's "SEO Secrets" page (which is also funny). It is called Googlefight.com.

John used it to demonstrate that Black Hat SEO is winning the Google game over White Hat SEO. Well according to Google fight it does hehe.

How does the tool work? Simple, you enter any two phrases into the specifically designed form at Googlefight.com and the tool will check the Google search results for each of the two phrases to see which one has a higher figure for estimated number pages found in the Google index. The phrase where Google returns a higher estimate wins. That's it, no more and no less.

Just for the fun of it did I initiate a Googlefight between "Carsten" and "Karsten", which are both comon spellings of my first name. I always thought that Karsten is the more widely used spelling than how my first name is spelled, "Carsten", with "C" and not a "K" at the beginning. So I was a bit surprised about the Googlefight results, which shows "Carsten" as the winner with 11,7000,000 results versus 8,080,000 for "Karsten". This is a clear victory by over 3,000,000 pages.



I don't think that my internet activities, which contribute a large number alltogether might caused this unexpected result, but hey, even I did not produce 3,000,000+ pages with my name written on it hehe.

Or how about a battle between "ansi art" and "ascii art"? Well, said and done. I knew already who would win this one, ASCII art of course with 2,030,000 versus just a meager 419,000 for ANSI art.



or how about AMIGA demos versus PC demos? A classic :).



Oh, I thought PC demos would win by a much higher margin than that. Maybe I underestimated the power of the Commodore AMIGA hehe.

Okay, enough of this! Well, it has been fun. Try it out yourself and fight out some "battles" of your own. :)

Cheers!
Carsten aka Roy/SAC

Labels: , ,

Wikipedia NOFOLLOW Argumentation - A View Back

This was a scrap or stub on my Cumbrowski.com site with the title "What the F**k is REL=NO FOLLOW?" for a while and I decided that I remove it from there. Wikipedia is now using nofollow and the discussion is a thing of the past. However, the argumentations are still valuable as long as there is the rel=nofollow attribute out there.

I decided to post the discussion here at my blog, where I have already made a number of posts that are related to Wikipedia, my activities at Wikipedia and Wikipedia issues and discussions.

It's a lot to read and not for everybody, but worthwhile for anybody who is interested in the NOFOLLOW debate in general.

Cheers!
Carsten aka Roy/SAC

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Originally written April, 24th 2006

What the F**k is REL="NO FOLLOW"? - Original Proposition

Presented to WikiProject Spam on 4/17/2006.

Wikipedia is not the only Site that suffers from so called "Link Spam". Every Site and especially Blogs that offer anonymous Visitors the ability to interact, comment or contribute and often even encourage it have a common problem. People that use the features to their own personal advantage without the goal to contribute for the benefit of others. From being rare cases of abuse in the past to today's frequent occurrences which became by now more than just annoyances. They became a problem.

The same type of problem with similar reasons for it's existence as email SPAM. Talk was not enough anymore. Tools and mechanisms had to be developed to reduce the negative impact of SPAM. The purpose of Link SPAM is not as apparent as email SPAM though. Email SPAM is usually send with the goal to get the recipient to open and read the email which contains a commercial offer with the hope that the reader acts and buys the offered product or service. Email SPAM has the goal to generate instant revenue and profit.

The Difference between eMail Spam and Link Spam

Link SPAM does not. The Blog Comment that is completely irrelevant for the Blog Article containing a short Message and Link to a commercial offer is not intended for the Article Author nor it's readers. If they respond to the offer "great", but that was not the original intent by the Spammer. The Link is not meant to attract "humans". It is indented to attract the invisible automated programs called "Spider" or "Bot" utilized by all major Search Engines such as Google, Yahoo!, MSN (MS LIVE) and ask.com to gather Web Content which is processed and later returned to Users at the Search Engine in the Search Results (SERPS) if they are considered relevant by the Search Engine for the keyword or phrase entered by the User. The results that are considered most "relevant" are returned first. It is the goal of every search engine to RANK the Web Pages that match the users Search Query by highest Relevance to the topic the user is searching for.

How work Search Engine? What is their Goal?

Search Engines use mind boggling algorithms to calculate the "Relevance" and thus "Ranking" of every Indexed Webpage relatively to the words and phrases found on the Web Page. If two pages contain the word "science", the search engine must make the decision, which of the two pages it believes to be more important, more relevant than the other to show it as first result, if a user enters the search term "science" at the Search Engines Website. If you search for "science" at Google.com, over 4 Million!!! Web Pages are found. Google must make the decision, which of the 4+ Million Pages it should show first to the User. It tries of course to return the ones first that are most likely the ones containing the information the User is looking for. How do Search Engines determine the ranking of each page? How do they determine that Page A is shown 5th for the term "science" and Page B 4,0000,000th. Both are obviously about "science" or they would not be considered for the results at all. The actual ranking is determined by over 100 criteria by Google for example.

One of the most important criteria is the so called "Page Rank" of a Page. Page Rank was introduced by Google and made them what they are today. The Page Rank algorithm revolutionized search engines and produced fantastic accurate results. Read the original scientific paper on Page Rank "The Anatomy of a Large-Scale Hypertextual Web Search Engine" by the Google Founders Sergey Brin and Lawrence Page or Page Rank Explained by Phil Craven to learn about the mathematical background of Page Rank.

Search Engine Ranking - Google PageRank

The actual equations are very complicated, but the general concept is surprisingly simple. In simply words is the "Page Rank" of a page getting higher the more other pages and sites link to it. Every Link is Vote from one Page towards another. The Linked to page gains Page Rank while the linking page looses a bit of it's Page Rank. I believe you start to understand where I am getting at and what the intentions of the link spammer are. Right, he wants to get a "Link" or "Vote" to his Commercial Website that Search Engines like Google think that the Page is more important.

The higher the Rank of the Linking Page itself is, the stronger is the Vote. A Link from CNN.com's Homepage is certainly a stronger Vote for a Webpage than a link to it from a personal Page at Geocities.com. That is the reason why more popular sites are more targeted by Link Spammers than less popular ones. Wikipedia is obviously very popular, thus a link from Wikipedia is worth a lot more than a Link from a less popular Site. Spammers are not only targeting public sites to get inbound links they also create artificial Link Farms and purchase links from Webmasters that are willing to cash in on their sites popularity. The Search Engines became actually very smart in detecting artificial inbound link inflation making Link Farms a lot less effective and even can cause the Website that is the beneficiary of this to get penalized or even banned from the Search Engine Index.

Wikipedia is the perfect Target

Wikipedia is the perfect target for spammers to get inbound links to their site(s) without risking a penalty from the search engines, because it is almost impossible for the search engines to determine if a link at Wikipedia was added because it is really relevant for the topic or just by a Spammer to increase his Page Rank. Blogs have the same Problem and Google developed a simple to implement mechanisms for the Blogger or Webmaster to eliminate the whole benefit of having an outbound link at those sites for the sole purpose of gaining Page Rank. The only purpose why a spammer is trying to place a link in the first place. Links can still be added and used by Human Visitors that are interested and click it. Search Engine Spiders on the other hand that visit the page will simply ignore the Link, it will not count as a vote for the target website.

How is that done? Very simple. Simply add the attribute rel="nofollow" to the HTML Link Tag

<a href="http://www.website.com">Link Anchor</a> becomes
<a href="http://www.website.com" rel="nofollow">Link Anchor</a>

Conclusion


As you can see, it is not hard to do at all. The Change to the Wikipedia Code is absolute minor. The Gain and Benefits are out of the Question. Does this solve the problem completely? No, of course not! But it will significantly reduce the issue, because a huge number of Links added just because of Page Rank will not be added anymore. The benefits of having an outgoing link from Wikipedia to a site are severely reduced, but of course not completely eliminated. There remains the benefit of human traffic clicking the link. In this case is the link better highly relevant for the article or it will be removed quickly by the Wiki users anyway (without the need of an Editor to take actions).


I hope this clarifies the subject a bit more and finds some open ears somewhere and finally one of the Wiki Developers to spend the necessary minutes (few hours at the most) to implement this feature saving thousands and thousands of hours wasted by hundreds of Editors that have probably better things to do and could use the saved time for more important contributions for Wikipedia.

--Roy-SAC 11:31, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
You can find some background information about me and my professional qualifications on my Professional Homepage to enforce the credibility of my statements made in this article. My email is available there as well, if you you have any questions or anything else you would like to discuss with me outside the User Discussion Page.

The Discussion - Introduction and Summary

Copy/Backup of comments posted at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Spam.

How to save hundreds or thousands of hours by spending just a few

Roy: I took the time to summarize and explain an important aspect of link spam on my user discussion page below. Some Editors expressed the opinion in the past that the proposed solution will not help to significantly reduce the problem which I vehement reject. Even if the impact is not as much as I expect will it still have enough impact to justify the necessary work to implement the solution. Being an enterprise solution developer myself gives me the authority to make the statement that the implementation of the solution can only be a matter of hours. An amount of time that will be saved multiple times over with absolute certainty in the future when it comes to link spam removal.

This will not immediately, because the word about the change has to go around and get to the potential link spammers first. Unless it will be picked up by the media and other means (bloggers etc.), a gradual impact should be expected. I invite everybody interested in this to join the discussion. Wikipedia Developers and Admins are more than welcome to join as well.
--Roy-SAC 11:55, 17 April 2006 (UTC)

Rhobite - Reasonable and respected Wikipedia Admin

Rhobite: You're acting like nofollow is a perfect solution to spam, but it isn't. Wikipedia has already had a large discussion about using nofollow. Mediawiki already has the technical ability to insert into links, but the community decided against it. See Wikipedia:Nofollow. Rhobite 15:01, 17 April 2006 (UTC)

Roy: Hi Rhobite. Thanks for the Move to the Discussion Section. It is not a perfect solution, but a working solution for one (major) part of the problem at hand.

I will go over the comments at Wikipedia:Nofollow in detail. It's been over a year now since the vote. The nofollow attribute was quite new back then and the traffic to wikipedia has also more than quadrupled since last year. I assume the issue is today also several times bigger than it was back then.

The Solution works for other Systems and Sites such as Blogs very well and reduced the issue a lot. Spammers are now creating the blogs themselves via programs (using API's) though :(. A different problem which requires a different solution.

The nofollow attribute is not diminishing the true purpose of an honest placed link. It works for a visitor who is clicking on it (and hopefully finds some more useful content) the same as a link without the attribute. This little attribute restores the original idea of hyper linking, when Links where only placed on Sites for Visitors to follow, not computer programs.

Google is the no.1 search engine worldwide with 50-60% Market Share despite the attempts of Yahoo!, MSN and ask.com to compete with Google in the Search Engine game. Yahoo threw the towel this January. ask.com was gaining, but only a bit, MSN is working on the problem to get their new search up and running. The situation did not get better, it got worse. the rel="no follow" attribute should be added automatically by the Wikipedia engine to ANY external link (URL's starting with "http://"), regardless if it is an Article, Discussion Page, User Page or System Page.

There should be NO on/off switch. This should be announced loud and clear to the public, also explaining what it does and what it NOT does. I bed with you $100 that with will reduce the amount of link spam you get here at wikipedia at least by a double digit number.

Since the current policy pretty much considers most external links as SPAM (-> see recommendation to link to the Yahoo Dir or Dmoz only and that's it)) is the total number of external links placed across Wikipedia a realistic measurement to evaluate the effects of adding the rel="no follow" attribute to all external links.
Since this is a topic I do know quite a lot about, I thought that it is a thing I am able to contribute well. Since I shoot myself into the foot with proposing and pushing for something like this, any doubt of an hidden agenda on my part can pretty much ruled out. I do believe in the need of valuable external links that enrich the content of an article at Wikipedia or provide proof for statements made in one.
I don't see any reason why the attribute should NOT be added except the reason that you want Wikipedia to be part of the Ranking Game. I can imagine that some Wikipedians do not like the idea, especially the ones that have a personal interest in some of the external links to their own personal/business websites. --Roy-SAC 15:51, 17 April 2006 (UTC)

Rhobite: My objection remains the same as a year ago: It doesn't deter spammers. Pagerank isn't the sole reason people spam Wikipedia. This is a very visible site, and if I were a spammer I would want to be linked from here, even if it didn't improve my Pagerank. A link from a prominent Wikipedia article could generate a lot of revenue for an unscrupulous person. Furthermore, Wikipedia can and should improve the Pagerank of good, relevant links. punishes operators of useful sites for the actions of spammers. Rhobite 16:57, 17 April 2006 (UTC)

Roy: It will certainly not deter all of them, probably not even the majority of them, but it will for sure deter some of them. if something is becoming less lucrative, less people will be tempted by it. That is an undeniable fact.

You are probably qualified to provide some rough numbers here. Let me ask you this? How much spam is removed by members of the SPAM project across all pages of Wikipedia every month? Lets be very pessimistic and assume that only 1% of the spammers are detered by the fact that they only have gain from a link via visitors that read the article and actually click on that link but don't gain anything else in the long run by increasing their rank in the Google SERPS and getting (a lot) more visitors from there?

How much time would 1% less spam save? Put that number next to the time it takes to implement the nofollow attribute (which is already in the code as you mentioned). And also how much LESS links that should be in the article get removed because of suspicion that the intent might be more selfish by the person that added it than it actually was?

You say that it will not deter any spammer at all which means that the amount of spam will remain the same if the nofollow attribute was added. This statement is based on what? Intuition? Facts? Show them to me. I can PROVE to you that the reduction and even better, the complete elimination of page rank of a link will deter people from adding knowingly links for selfish reasons.

If you get the chance, talk to a DMOZ Editor of an important commercial category. He will tell you, that he still gets more submissions than he can handle, but he will also tell you, that it is much less since Google de-valued links to sites that are listed at Dmoz in their Ranking Algorithm. The "punishment" of useful sites will be less of an issue than you think. Regular Sites that can not be changed by every john and joe out there will still link to those sites.

People who discover the site because of the Link from Wikipedia will also pickup the URL and link to it (I have done that myself more than one). If a sites reaches a certain popularity, Pagerank becomes less of a factor for the ranking. An increase from a Page Rank of 6 to a rank of 7 for example is huge, it gets even harder to impossible to get to a rank of 9 (There are mayby 1 or 2 dozen sites in the world that have that).

Lets summarize. It will certainly reduce spam if implemented consequently across the site and made public, it is easy to do implement, because the Wikipedia code is already ready for it and last but not least, the affect on valuable (authority or popular) sites is minimal. If you disagree, explain why. --71.195.125.110 20:49, 17 April 2006 (UTC)
...

Stevietheman - Active Wikipedian

Well, I spent the time reading the complete Nofollow page from the intro to the votes and finally the comments. There was a lot of clutter (on both sides of the argument). I "stripped" out the comments that clearly showed that the writer had no clue about the meaning/purpose of the non-W3C-standard rel=nofollow attribute, or about spamming (link spamming and spamming in general) and especially not about Search Engine Optimization (SEO), in particular Google.

The remaining "on the topic" facts and arguments for both opinions were overwhelmingly in favor of keeping the attribute enabled. I was surprised to find out that "only" 41% voted to keep the new implemented feature in Wikipedia (which was obviously "enabled" by default after the update that contained it was installed) and 61% voted for its removal (deactivation).

I have to speculate to explain this result. I guess a lot of the votes must have been based on "feelings" rather than facts or other motives must have been a factor. But hey, I am irritated by the fact that you Rhobite, somebody who is affected by the spam every single day, as one of Wikipedias first line of defense against link spam is against the use of the attribute.

Anything that makes your live easier without violating any of your basic beliefs and opinions should be welcomed and even embraced by you. Is the spam problem not that bad? You should know the best. Please tell me.

Btw, I think you did a great job fixing the grammar of my additions to the Affiliate marketing article about a month ago. You have great language skills and you should use those skills more often on article content than on wasting it on banal Link Spam removals.

I am working on improving my writing skills though (it is my second language after all). Thanks. --roy<sac> Talk! .oOo. 09:23, 18 April 2006 (UTC)

Stevietheman In a democracy, or rather, a wikicracy, no one person can decide which votes to accept and which to set aside. We all apply our own value judgments when voting. The bottom line is that the wikicracy said we're not doing nofollow, and that's that. — Stevie is the man! Talk | Work 22:39, 18 April 2006 (UTC)

Roy You are absolutely right about the democracy. The voting/election process in a democracy is essentially very simple. Everybody that is part of the society has one vote. All votes are counted equal. The value of a vote can not be reduced or increased based on qualitative criteria. Emotions and feelings influence our decisions (votes) although most people try to be as objective as possible when it comes to that.

I just noticed for that particular vote, that emotions and feelings must have played a major role, because the objective information that were available at the same time and should have played a major role during the decision making process are conflicting the actual votes.

"wikicracy said" ... "and that's that" sounds very absolute to me. Things that involve larger groups of human beings have the tendency to change over time. Those changes make it necessary for everybody to frequently check and adjust our opinions on things. Those changes can verify existing opinions, but can also make it necessary to question an opinion as a whole and change completely. Ignoring the changes and the refusal to check if the current opinion is still as valid as before lead to no good in the past.

The World History is full of cases where absolutism, ignorance and stagnatism caused a lot of pain and suffering, to eventually end very sudden and very violent.--roy<sac> Talk! .oOo. 04:22, 19 April 2006 (UTC)

Stevietheman Even as somebody who detests link spam, I have always objected to using "rel=nofollow". The central reason is that by using it, Wikipedia is basically saying "We wish to not contribute any information to search engines that may aid in people finding the material they are seeking." In short, this would be an anti-search, anti-Internet move in my opinion. The value of search comes from how web documents relate to each other. Extricating the tremendously important resource that is the Wikipedia from this overall process would in turn remove a lot of value from Internet search. And I will jump up and down and up and down again if that helps in preventing the Wikipedia from ever making such a foolhardy decision to implement nofollow.

Now, add to the above the other common reasons for being against it, including "doing this won't really deter spam", which I also agree with. — Stevie is the man! Talk | Work 22:36, 18 April 2006 (UTC)

Summarizing Statement and Conclusion

Roy I disagree on the statements that the rel=nofollow are anti-search and anti-Internet. I agree that it will have some impact on search, to be precise, search results at Google.com. It will be a positive and negative impact with the negative one further declining over time to something negligible.

The positive impact is, that the junk that is currently in Wikipedia will loose ranking and be replaced by hopefully more relevant content in the Google SERP's (I am referring to ANY part/page of the Wikipedia site that is accessible by the public, not just articles).

The negative impact is, that good content that is being linked to will drop (may be) as well, but I strongly believe that when it comes to highly relevant and good external sources linked to from active and live article pages will be marginal.
"Real" high quality content sites and pages have very often a pretty high and honest (intended) PageRank. The loss of the vote by the one link from Wikipedia will have little or no impact.

Furthermore, PageRank is very specific to Google. Ranking based on "Back Links" evaluation are a very small factor for the Yahoo! Search Engine and virtually none for MSN. Google is the only SE where it really matters, but Google has a 50-60% market share.

The rel=nofollow attribute was introduced by Google itself for sites that meet certain criteria. Wikipedia is certainly fitting the description of sites where Google recommends the use of the attribute. This contradicts the statement that the use of the rel=nofollow attribute is being anti-search.

Anti-Internet is also not being the case, on the contrary, it is as Pro-Internet as it can possibly get. Links to other Websites were never intended for programs and scripts. They were meant for human visitors from the beginning. The rel=nofollow attribute will not change this but remind people of the true purpose of linking between websites. Back to the Roots.

This Article from Gary McHugh called "Stinking Linking Thinking" from a month ago hits the Nail on the Head. It explains very well the original intentions for the use of the HREF HTML Tag. A friendly reminder for everybody who has all but forgotten this after all those years of mutilation , rape and abuse of those beautifully simple and user friendly tools.

Last but not least, I still would like to know some facts and details that made you come to the following opinion: "doing this won't really deter spam". So far does it look only like a believe or feeling to me without any objective grounds to stand on. I hope you can help me with that one. --roy<sac> Talk! .oOo. 05:39, 19 April 2006 (UTC)

Roy Here is an interesting post about the "nofollow" attribute by Matt Cutts (Who is a Senior Engineer at Google). He bloged about it here. Arguments coming from such a highly knowledgable and respected authority might convince some of you more than I was able to. --roy<sac> Talk! .oOo. 13:07, 19 May 2006 (UTC)

WikiProject:Spam Opinions and Facts wanted (Invitation)

After writing longer and longer invitations to join the discussion and provide input and idata on some Wikipedians Talk pages did I end up with this rather long one which I intend to continue to post on other Users Talk Pages from whom I believe to be able to contribute to the collection of facts and past experiences. I encourage anybody who wants to help and knows a Wikipedian who might be able to provide valuable input for this cause, to grab this paragraph and post it and the Wikipediants Talk Page or simply link to it. Here is the Link Code

[[User_talk:Cumbrowski#WikiProject:Spam_Opinions_and_Facts_wanted_(Invitation)|<u>'''WikiProject:Spam''' 
Opinions and Facts wanted (Invitation)</u>]]
The Link will look like this: WikiProject:Spam Opinions and Facts wanted (Invitation)

Hello my fellow Wikipedian!
I know the following text is long (no kiddin'), but I thought I'd rather present the details upfront than having you guessing them. There is no "Due Date" which means, that there is no need to rush and the need of dropping the things you are currently doing :). I'd rather have you take your time with it when you have it and are also in the mood for it, than rushing over it without giving it much thought and dumping it on the done pile.

Introduction and Summary

I am looking for Wikipedians that are interested in and knowledgeable about the Issue of Link Spam at Wikipedia to express their opinion about some of my recommendations to reduce it based on my research and experiences with it due to my professional background. I believe, that you one of them, that fits the "profile" perfectly :).

My Opinion and my Request to you

It seems to be an "old" and "done" subject, Even a vote about 15 months ago was conducted about it. All what I found out and collected about it makes it seem like an open issue rather than a thing that was settled for good. Too few facts were presented and not much (if any) quantifiable/measurable information were provided.
I would like you do go over the stuff I collected and consolidated so far and provide your point of view regarding this. If you have already done so in the past, simply reference to it that I can check it out.

I am also looking for some statistical information to be able to assess the real extent of the problem (and not just the felt one) as well as it's development over an extended period of time. If you have already anything like this or know how to get it, let me know. If you don't, but can point me into directions and/or people that can, let me know as well.

Tech-Stuff

It's really appreciated. You can get technical with me, I have the necessary background for it. You can check that on my User Page. I come the Microsoft/IIS/SQL Server/VB/.NET Environment, but I have some general understanding of the technology and ideas behind it which are mostly platform independent. I do know basic PHP and also installed recently the latest MediaWiki Version 1.5.8 and MySQL Server for Windows Version 5.0.19 on a Windows 2003 Server with IIS6 and PHP5 Extension. I can use this installation for some Tests or Script Development which den might be used at the Live Wikipedia. Probably Scripts for Data Collection and Assessment only. I do not intend to develop anything to make changes to processes and features of Wikipedia.org. If it happens that something that could be used in the future comes out of it, fine. I do not intend to write anything for myself, whatever comes out of it will be Public Domain (Open Source without any restriction for it's use at all).

My Intensions and Goals

I wrote similar Invitations on Talk Pages of other Wikipedia I came across, but this one is the most detailed version of it in regards to explaining my intentions and purpose of the whole thing in great length and depth. I would appreciate, if you would invite other interested Wikipedians that are authorities in this area to give their input as well. I would like to keep the ones, that only know little details and have only general/common knowledge about this kind of stuff out of the discussion for now to prevent it from getting dispersed right at the beginning and turned into a rhetoric discussion. Nothing will come out of it, if only one "belief" group argues against another, based on speculations and feeling rather than facts and solid numbers. An open for all discussion will have to happen at some point in time, but it should be later, when enough data and information are available to have some solid ground for a general discussion for everybody that gets at least a chance to end in actions that will benefit everybody at Wikipedia and its many users in the long run.

Sincerely --roy<sac> Talk! .oOo. 05:41, 20 April 2006 (UTC)

Labels: ,

Why Worry Today, If Your Bank Account Gets Hacked Tomorrow

My post from a week ago, about the major flaws in the new online banking security systems that banks around the country deployed recently, did not get any attention. The flaw was explained in detail and demonstrated (by actually hacking a bank account) at the Defcon 15 hacker conference in Las Vegas. One person dugg it at Digg.com and that was it. End of story, nobody seems to be interested. Well, it only affects pretty much everybody, at least everybody who uses online banking.

Meanwhile did also other blogs that are specialized in application and system security write about the story. DarkReading.com was one of the most known publications who published the story "New Bank Practices Make Hacking Easier" a couple days after I published mine.

Their story died at Digg.com, just as mine, but at least did some more bloggers pick up their story. Here are a few other bloggers who picked it up:

Here is a picture of Brendan O'Connor, who presented the issue at the conference, which makes it easy to understand, why some people might not give him the attention he deserves.

It is funny how things work sometimes. On the one hand are people going berserk and crazy about some "big privacy issues" that are bullshit. I just mention Google and the other search engines regarding their updates to their privacy policies.

I guess it has to hurt a bunch of people first, some accounts hacked and life's and businesses ruined that people wake up and ask "WTF is going on here?". The cries will be loud and painful to listen to. People will ask "Did nobody knew about this?" .. Of course did somebody knew about this, but you were not listen, you dumba...!

"Schadenfreude" is not a good thing in this matter, but a bit cynicism does not hurt either.

Quick Update: Here is the 47 pages presentation by Brendan O'Connor from DefCon 15 in PDF format (only 230KB in size), titled "Greater Than One - Defeating 'strong' authentication in web applications". pdf dc-15-oconnor.pdf

The presentation document goes into much more details than I was in my previous blog post. It also illustrates the issues nicely. Check it out.


Carsten aka Roy/SAC

Labels: ,

New Online Banking Security Process Opens More Security Holes Than it Closes

I just got back from DefCon 15 at the Rivera Hotel and Casino in Las Vegas. I will post about the other events at another time, because what I saw this late afternoon at the conference is more important. It is ironic that this session was one of the last one, when many guys already left the conference and were on their way home.

I saw at the conference, where a guy who is (maybe) legal drinking age showed a room full of hundreds of people (it became surprisingly crowded while his presentation progressed) “how cool” the new security add-ons to the online banking login and authentication process are. Additions that are enforced by governmental regulations with the intention to make online banking more secure.

The session was going well beyond the "time limit" for it (1 1/2 hours instead of 50 minutes) and the organizers shut it down eventually and the whole thing moved into a overcrowded Q&A room where the discussion and presentation was continued by the speaker for another 45 minutes, which was pretty cool of him, but you could tell, that he wanted to get this info out there.

Yes, the session was about online banking, the new and "more secure" online banking.

You might noticed that pretty much every bank changed their authentication forms and procedures over the last few months. Those changes, caused by the new government regulations are basically aiding hackers to break into your online account.

  • Did you notice steps like picking "your" personal image (from a number of choices provided by the bank), that the bank will show you in the future as a proof to you, that it is really us, your bank, and not a hacker doing a phishing attempt to get to your personal information"?

  • Did you see the security questions that are derived from your public records, very similar as if you try to access your credit report? Questions like, "Which of the following X things are true?" and then showing you things like previously owned car makes or home loan amounts, where one of them is matching yours?

Yes, those are the new security measurements that were ADDED to the existing online banking software, actually boiler plated in front of the existing software, almost in all cases provided by a different 3rd party vendor, because it was cheaper to add that kind of "patch" to the process to meet government regulations than it would have been to add it to the existing banking software itself, fully integrated.

What struck me the most is how bad it actually is. The new "enhancements" did not enhance the security of the old processes at all. They have the same flaws, but worse, they increased the attack surface for a malicious hacker and made it in fact easier for him to get the information he wants and even more as a bonus.

If I spent a few days with it, I would probably able to hack my bank myself. Its that bad and I am not a hacker (I am a geek and know a lot of stuff, but that does not make me a hacker and/or security expert for something like Online Banking).

I am sure that over the coming weeks and months stuff will surface in the news. People complaining or incidents about hacked accounts. Too much people saw this, not the detailed instructions how to break into the online banking software via a step by step guide, but he showed the way the updated systems work, or better, not work.

He would have broken the law and go to jail, if he would have hacked somebody else's bank account in front of hundreds of witnesses. He hacked his own bank account instead and provided proof that he is not doing anything extremely hard or attacked the system in a way to alter its behaviour.

By the way, the guys name is "Brendan O'Connor" and he works for an unnamed US finance company. He is not an unknown. He did break at last years DefCon the news about a security hole in Xerox printers, which caused quite some stir.

This time is the issue a much bigger and affecting much more people.
I will throw in some keywords and phrases that point to the problems. If you know a bit about computers, the internet and web development, you will get a pretty good idea what I am talking about.

  • New Security is ADD-ON on top of existing authentication layer

  • Finger Printing based on HTTP header content via client side Javascript (tip: "View Source", don't waste the time and write something yourself. Make it easier for you. If your bank uses Flash instead, download the flash and decompile it)

  • Security question will reappear if remained unanswered. Answers will change every time the question is asked (randomly). No limit how often the same question is being asked (until answered)

  • Personal image system. Same system used by majority of banks. Don't waste time on the images. Look at the alt tags. If you have an account, (don't) look at the nice image gallery where you can pick YOUR picture from. Look at the page where the image is shown to you. Ignore the image file name, that changes all the time and is not predictable, but look at the.. you know what to look at.

  • Be grateful for non-obscure error messages, sometimes is the time the system spends on thinking about how to tell you that you entered the wrong stuff the actual message.

  • If you write your own pages, don't forget to use the code you already got. Put a reference to the source in it and don't take the credits for yourself. Somebody spent a lot of time to write that code (for you) :)

Okay, that is enough. I hope you get the picture. I forgot to write the email of Brendan down. It was name.name@gmail.com. The "O'" part of his last name makes me unsure, if it was brendan.oconnor AT gmail DOT com or something different. You can find out through the DefCon.org organizers. Brendan said that he provides the code and everything to anybody who wants to see it.

One thing is for sure. That story does not make me sleep better at night, especially if you consider the fact that you are with almost 100% certainty not covered, if your account gets hacked and have to cover the losses yourself, opposite to the archaic method of using checks, where losses are covered by the bank, even if you lost your check book due to grave negligence. This is messed up!

Quick Update: Here is the 47 pages presentation by Brendan O'Connor from DefCon 15 in PDF format
(only 230KB in size), titled "Greater Than One - Defeating 'strong' authentication in web applications".
pdf dc-15-oconnor.pdf

And also see the video recording of the DefCon Session with Brendan O'Connor:



Backup link to the video T164 - Greater Than 1 - Defeating "Strong" Authentication in Web Applications at Google Video if you have problems with playing the embedded video.

Labels: ,

Good Article Nomination and the Day of Independence

It is Wednesday the 4th of July 2007. Today is a holiday, Independence Day. I have some work to do, but I also did something that is dear to my heard.

It is today almost exactly one month after I posted about the struggle with the featured article nominations for the article to search engine optimization at Wikipedia and the article did appear on the Wikipedia homepage for everybody to see.



That was two days ago on Monday, July 2, 2007. Jonathan Hochman aka “Jehochman“ at Wikipedia did a good job there and also spent a lot of time on the article to get it up to the level of featured.

That an article to a subject like search engine optimization gets featured at Wikipedia was very encouraging. You must consider that a number of Wikipedians think less than favorable about anything related to monetization and internet marketing.

I spent a lot time myself on the article to affiliate marketing, which I nominated end of last week for the status of a "good article" (I step before "featured article"). The nomination process is currently on hold to do some tweaking and tuning of the article. Especially help with the grammar is needed and a bit rephrasing work for a few things here and there.

Graeme Bartlett is the editor who is doing the review of the article. He gave me some useful tips, including where to find some practical help. One is a new project within the Wikipedia project "Business and Economics", which is called "Collaboration of the Month" (Beta). I made my plea for help with the affiliate marketing article there and hope that it will be considered.

The article came a long way. You can see here the so called diff (difference) between the versions of the article from February 26, 2006, the day when I did the first edit in the article, and the current one. The article failed its first “good article” nomination in March, which was a little bit premature. You can see here the difference between the versions of the article from March 8, 2007, the day when it was nominated for the first time and today’s version.

The number of active editors dropped over time and I am now the only one left who seems to care. I hope that I can get at least some people to go over the article for plain and simple spell and grammar checking. If you read this and are willing to help out, head over to Wikipedia and read the article. If you find any errors, go ahead and edit the article to fix the error immediately. I would appreciate it.

Let’s see how it goes. In the meantime, I would like to wish everybody who is living here in the United States a happy 4th of July and hope that you have or had a good time with your loved ones.

Cheers!
Carsten aka Roy/SAC


Update July 11, 2007
More information about the "Good Article" status at Wikipedia. To put things into perspective.
  • Currently, 1,480 of a total of 1,871,105 Wikipedia articles (about 1 in 1,260) are featured articles

  • Currently, 2,511 (about 1 in 745) articles meet the good article criteria
The article to affiliate marketing failed again the nomination for good article. Everything was taken care of, except for some issues with the writing style and Grammar. No editor who is good with the English language reacted to my requests for help. It's sad.

Labels: ,

deviantART and Web 2.0

It was a post that was several months in the making. I was having it on my to-do list for months, but was finally able to finish and publish it.

I am not talking about a post here, but at my Blog at ReveNews.com, which is related to internet and affiliate marketing. The blog post I did is titled "User Generated Advertising Web 2.0 Style" and is about leveraging communities like deviantART.com for your business.

deviantART is a great place for businesses who want to do "different" advertising, 100% Web 2.0 style. I suggested the use of dA design contests to have artists create designs for any kind of thing you can come up with. I explained the benefits like this:

You engage people, inspire creativity and get authentic designs, which are honest and pure. It could be a web 2.0 style advertising campaign, very viral (speaking of buzz marketing).



It's a pretty long post, but I recommend to read it, if you are interested in this sort of things.



I did a contest at deviantART myself last year. It was not a design contest, but it was a contest to promote my Text art site RoySAC.com a little bit. I blogged about it too. I hope this provides some inspiration. Just think outside the box from time to time and try out new things. This is true no matter what you are doing.

Cheers!

Carsten aka Roy/SAC

Labels: ,

At Last - Some Success at Wikipedia

I am a Wikipedian since December 2005. I wrote about how that happened back in April.

I did over 2000 edits in Wikipedia since then, mostly articles and other things that are either related to internet marketing or to the Demoscene and Text art. I did a lot of work on the articles to affiliate marketing and the article to ASCII art.

I try for a long time to get other affiliate marketers to contribute to Wikipedia to that subject, but my attempts are not bearing any fruits so far. In addition, my major rant last month was not as successful as I had hoped. I hope that it will change eventually.

But there are also good news.

The article to search engine optimization was promoted to “featured article” at Wikipedia. I did contribute some stuff to the article and was always watching it for spammers and vandals. I was also active in discussions on the articles talk page.

What does featured article mean? Here is what Wikipedia itself says, quote:

Featured articles in Wikipedia

Featured articles are considered to be the best articles in Wikipedia, as determined by Wikipedia's editors. Before being listed here, articles are reviewed at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates for accuracy, neutrality, completeness, and style according to our featured article criteria.

At present, there are 1,420 featured articles, of a total of 1,815,298 articles on Wikipedia. Thus, about one in 1,270 articles is listed here. Articles that no longer meet the criteria can be proposed for improvement or removal at Wikipedia:Featured article review.

A small bronze star () on the top right corner of an article's page indicates that the article is featured.

Nice, eh?

It was not easy and it was a lot of work, mostly by the editor Jehochman, who is a SEO with the real name Jonathan Hochman.

You can see that by looking at the discussion page for the nomination. One of the biggest issue was the fact that many sources are blogs. Wikipedia is still working on improving on the bias a lot of editors have regarding the quality of blogs. Some missed the fact that blogs became popular with online publications and also classic offline ones who have a website and publish their content online. That did not prevent the debate whether or not the references used to verify the facts are reliable or not.

I made a call to several known SEOs to comment on the resources. A few actually did, which was nice, while others, like Rand Fishkin from SEOmoz posted an article at his blog instead.

It was titled “Search Engine Optimization Article at Wikipedia Doesn't Deserve Attention” and I know that Rand did choose the title more to draw attention to it than actually meaning it.

He is not supporting Wikipedia and the efforts made by other marketers, like Jonathan and me. He did also make some valid points. I believe however, that there are a lot of misconceptions and bias from the side of the SEO community towards Wikipedia, something the SEO community blamed the Wikipedia community for. That is actually very ironic. Yes, it is true, there is bias, but at least try the Wikipedians to cope with it and find a solution for the problem. I left a ton of comments at the blog and hope that I got something across. For example:

"The truth becomes whatever the popular opinion is."

Isn't that what the "truth" is anyway? Truth is to 99% opinion. Even if all items available to you are proven, documented and unskewed facts, does it not make it true, because you don't know if all items that are available to you are all items there are.

The leaving out of a fact can change the "truth" in an instant. No lie or biased comment necessary.


and as response to a comment to my comment did I write:

That's why are the core rules "Neutral Point of View" and "no original resource" so important. An encyclopedia is about facts, not interpretation. Neutral point of view means that facts that could be interpreted as negative have to be included as much as the facts that could be interpreted as positive.

The interpretation of all the facts and make it out to be something good or something bad is not the purpose of an encyclopedia. If you take the same set of facts today and look at them again in the future, the interpretation might changes from good to bad or the other way around due to changes in society and people's values.

That's the idea, but that is harder to do in reality than it sounds when you say it. People are people and the only thing we can do is trying. If the try was good or bad is a question of interpretation again. Ironic, isn't it? :)


I made a lot more comments, but you get the picture. It is not as easy as it seems and all we can do is try our best to make it as good as possible.

Barry Schwartz was also reporting about it at SearchEngineLand.com. I could not help it, but be a bit sarcastic in my comment.

Well, it’s done, the article is now a featured article and I think that it will help the SEO community indirectly. If you plan to do work at Wikipedia, check out my collection of relevant Wikipedia resources for newbie’s. I am sure that you will appreciate them.

Cheers!
Carsten aka Roy/SAC

Labels: ,

Travel back in Time for a Vision of the Future

I traveled a couple days a go back in time to the year 1994 to an internet marketing and advertising conference. Wait a moment. Did I say 1994? Yes I did and I am not trying to trick you.

See here the video recording of one of the first, if not the first internet marketing and advertising conference, which was held on November 4th,1994 in San Francisco, California.

What happened?
Ken McCarthy is the first speaker and talks about opportunities. He was very forward thinking and you might think that what he says is obvious and logical. They were not in 1994. The second speaker is Marc Andreessen, co-Founder of Netscape, which was founded just a bit earlier in 1994 as well after the overwhelming success and popularity of their software called "web browser", the original "Mosaic" and the creation of the World Wide Web as we know it today.

The Web is just existed for a year or so when the conference was held.



link to video


It was a nice trip back in time. It also brought some memories back and a chuckle when I heard Ken talk about the role of BBS systems in the growth of the internet.

I have to say that he was a bit off when it comes to the role of Bulletin Board Systems (BBS) would play in getting people online by becoming something like a mini-ISP. True, a lot of BBS software development companies were jumping on the bandwagon and worked on internet integration into their software. With about 50,000+ bulletin boards in the united states at that time did it may be quite reasonable. I happened to be a Sysop of a bulletin board exactly around that time and can tell you that this could not have worked that way.

What are we talking about here?
The vast majority of the BBS's where run by individuals as a hobby and not as a business. Access was often free, but donations for hardware upgrades were appreciated. The resources were limited and multi-line (more than one modem) BBS's became only widely available at the beginning of the nineties when the computer hardware was able to connect multiple nodes to a single computer. But even then remained the number of BBS systems with more than 5 or even more than 10 nodes relatively low.

A BBS that was an ISP (kind of)
If you want to get an Idea how a BBS looked like with over 20-30 nodes, look at the picture below. That is "one corner" of the Rusty-n-Edie's BBS around 1988-89 and far away from its final size. The BBS had a staggering 128 dial in connections available in its prime and needed one computer for each line, plus multiple support servers. Details are from the article "The Birth of Rusty n Edie's BBS" that was written by the sysop of Rusty n Edie's, Rusty Hardenburgh.

If the majority of BBS's would have been like that, the Idea of them becoming a micro-ISP would have been a bit more realistic.


(Equipment detail follow at the end of the post)

The Reality
Normal BBS's were limited in bandwidth and dial in connections. My BBS had 5 lines, which means that it could handle 5 callers at the same time. My BBS had over 100 active users and a lot of them called every day or every other day. At peak times were all 5 lines constantly busy, which means that a lot of my users got a busy signal for a period of time, before they got a connection when another user left.

A user that is finally able to connect checks a few mails online, if the BBS was file focuses as mine. Some Systems were message focused and connected in networks like the Fidonet (which could be compared to the early Usenet of the Internet). Since the volume of message could be pretty big depending on the number of subjects you were interested in and subscribed for, users did not read the emails while connected to the BBS, but connected with special software, like Email clients today and downloaded new messages and uploaded responses.

If the BBS was created to be a place to swap files, the user would check the mostly new uploaded files only, flag the ones he is interested in and start a download and possibly an upload at the same time. When finished, users would hang up and leave to consume the downloaded content "offline", making the node available to another user.

Because of that was it possible for small BBS's with only a handful nodes to serve so much people. The "online time" was fairly brief.

..and the conclusion
Connecting the user with the world wide web would have changed that and make users stay longer connected because they can't browse the net "offline". During that time is the node blocked for any other user, which would reduce the number of people you could serve in a reasonable manner.

Add to this, that the BBS would also require a permanent connection to the internet which was not cheap back then. There was no such thing as high speed internet yet. What some Sysops did, was the option for users to create an internet email account and use the BBS as something like a Hotmail or Gmail.

The end of the BBS era was coming, but some did not wanted to believe it. BBS software companies attempted to create internet versions of their BBS software, but failed to realize that the internet does not work like a BBS. Needless to say, with the BBS's did also die a lot of BBS software companies, including Clark Development who created "PcBoard", the BBS software I was using (Rusty n Edie's too btw).

That's life. There is nothing anybody could have done to change the course of history.

Here are the promised technical details about the Rusty-n-Edie's BBS.
  • Three 486 33Mhz servers with 32 Megabytes of memory on each. One 22Mhz 486 server with 80 Megabytes of RAM. They each have a caching controller. We need that much memory to cache the fifteen 780 Megabytes SCSI drives, three 1.2 Gigabytes and two 386 Megabytes ESDI drives, the 20 drives format to something over 15 Gigabytes.

  • 128 (one for each node) 16Mhz 286's.
  • In addition, we have eight 33Mhz 386's, a 16Mhz 386 (our original server, our original Tandy XT type machine died about a year ago), and five 12Mhz 286's (These machines are so we can work on the system without taking it down).
  • 25 Anchor: 2400 baud modems.
  • 58 US Robotic's Dual Standards 14.4 V32 V32bis V42bis.
  • 24 Compucom 9600 baud Speedmodems.
  • 5 Hayes V-Series V42bis modem.
  • 16 direct connect CONNECT-USA lines.
  • All of this networked together with four copies of the wonderful Novell Netware 386. It works great!
  • The whole thing is hooked up to ten huge batteries that supply 16KV of uninterruptable power.
  • Sysops: the couple Rusty Hardenburgh and Edwina Hardenburgh, two of their son's, their daughter and a friend of the family with the name Carl
The BBS was busted by and shut down by the FBI in 1993 because of software piracy.
More to that is available at Wikipedia.

Labels: , , ,

Affiliate Genocide - SEJ Post 3-3-2007 - Comments

I know that this post is a bit off topic and I promise that it will not be like it was between May and July 2006.

I made a post at Search Engine Journal yesterday that causes quite some misunderstanding and a discussion that did not have much to do with the original post. That lead to an edit of the post which is available here and includes an Edit Note that points to the original post and comments at my family website.

You can find the original post and comments here.

The family site does not allow any comments so I post this article here at my Roy/SAC blog for the purpose of providing the ability to have people comment or ask questions to go deeper into the subject.

So feel free to add your comments regarding the original post and comments that are about the issue with Nazi-Germany and the Holocaust here. If your comment is about the issue with Google, nofollow and Affiliate Marketing, please comment at the current post at Search Engine Journal. Thanks.

Labels: , , ,

Google Launches CPA Affiliate Network

Roy/SAC aka Carsten Cumbrowski SeekingApha published in their news column today Google's announced of the beta launch of their newest Addition to Google AdSense. CPA Ads.

AdSense offers already the option for Advertisers to select specific publishers to display their Ads. Payments are done on CPM basis, which stands for Cost per Mill or Cost per 1,000 Ad Impressions (Displays).

CPA on the other hand stands for Cost per Action. The Advertiser pays a specific amount in commission to the publisher who refers a customer to the Advertisers site that performs a desired action.

This is Affiliate Marketing and not classic Display Advertising anymore. Relationships based on CPA integrate the publisher into the sales process. It is of the interest of the publisher as much as it is for the Advertiser to send quality leads to the Advertisers offer instead of just displaying the Ads or just care about the clicks.

This is huge. Google enters the domain of companies like ValueClick. Was the announcement of CJ's LMI just a counter measure of ValueClick who probably saw this coming? What will be up next?
I don't think that it will be a ValueClick killer as the flashy Head Line at SeekingApha states, but it will certainly cause some movement in the Advertising industry; hopefully to something better, safer and more measurable.

I guess we will see. The new CPA System provided by Google will be a very interesting alternative to current compensation models for some publishers. Too bad, that you must get an invitation to participate in the beta program.

Labels:

Affiliates, Trademarks and Organic Search Engine Results

Roy/SAC aka Carsten CumbrowskiThe whole Affiliate Marketing industry is debating in forums, magazines, blogs and news sites the issue of Affiliates that bid for the merchants trademark(s) at PPC Search Engines.

I have not seen a discussion so far that talks about Affiliates that show up in the top positions of the natural search result pages (SERPS) for the merchant trademark(s) at the search engines.

I haven't much though about this myself to be honest with you, but that changed after I had a conversation with a merchant who was looking for a tool to find affiliates that copied content from certain pages of the Merchants Website.

It is usually not a problem, if affiliates copy content from a merchant site. On the contrary, affiliates are often encouraged to do so. This makes sure that the message send to customers remains true. Something that is not always the case, if the affiliate writes its own content.

The merchant I talked to had no general problem with that, but he has a problem with affiliates that copy content from some very special pages. The merchant is doing active SEO (Search Engine Optimization) or to be more precise, is using the (expensive) services of a SEO Company.

if you are doing active SEO and special optimized Landing Pages are created (one of the items you usually get with an expensive SEO package) , you certainly don't want anybody to copy it. Affiliate Managers (AM's) should look out for Affiliates that do this.

But here is the issue that is very similar to the trademark bidding issue at PPC Search Engines.

I assume that the SEO activities of most companies include pages that are optimized for the merchant Trademarks to make sure that you are showing up on top of the organic SERPS if somebody searches for it, right? This would make sense.

That leaves 9 more spots for other sites on Page one plus 10 on page 2. Who do you like to see there for searches on our trademark? Friends, Partners, Fans if you have them; The good stuff basically. Sites that talk nice about you and/or your products or services.

The merchant I talked to didn't seem to have any problems with his trademark. The first page at Google looks very nice. Merchant himself Spot 1 (Where he should be), Fan Site at spot two and a well known site that refers to the merchant services at spot 3 and so on and so forth. Strong Message. Not even a shadow of something potentially negative and sites that are the Competitors of the merchant .

If you have the problem that some results for your trademark terms are either negative or from competitors, you might want to consider to work with some of your trusted affiliates to get them ranked high for your trademarks. Better would certainly be, if you could achieve the same with your own sites, but that is not always possible for every merchant.

I thought that this issue is very interesting and in my opinion also very important. It should be talked about much more. I'd like to hear different opinions regarding this. What are your thoughts on this?

Labels:

ValueClick Behavioral Marketing and Commission Junction LMI

Recap
ABestWeb started commenting on Beth Kirsch Post "CJ's Link Change an Indicator of an Integrated ValueClick Behavioral Marketing Network?" at ReveNews and credited me for "fleshing it out".

It was pointed out that "Kellie aka Ms.B" talked about this prior my blog post at this thread at ABW.

To give credits to the right person, I have to give it to Wayne Porter who interview with the VC Exec at iMedia Connection on 5/30. Everything fell into place after I read it.

I had the general feeling, that the Initiative is about tracking of additional data right from the beginning. That's why did I call my rather sarcastic post on 5/26 "Are you ready for CJ Analytics?".

I knew that something was missing at that point. The CJ Podcast hardened this feeling and when I read the interview on 5/30 did finally everything make sense.

I collected more information and did some more specific research before I posted my very long post on 6/5. I had more notes with more to cover, but it was already long enough. I posted some as comment at Beth's post at ReveNews.

Further Research
I did some more research after it struck me on 5/30. ValueClick moves into an area DoubleClick has been before in 2000 and got the federal government involved.

The Federal Trade Commission initiated an investigation of DoubleClick after a suit was filed in California alleging violations of the State Constitution. See the paper from July 2000 published at epic.org.

The Network Advertising Initiative (NAI) was mentioned and their "self regulating" activities and the NAI principles.

Check the NAI Members! Look who else is on the list: Hotbar, 180solutions, WhenU This raised some concerns with me, when it comes to the quality of the NAI principles and regulations.It seems that I am not alone, the Paper commented on the NAI principles (regarding opt-in):

"It is also largely unclear what "robust" notice would mean for Internet users, especially important since it will be provided when personal data is to be linked with anonymous data. According to the NAI Principles"

and

"For notice to be robust, the consumer must be afforded clear and conspicuous notice about the scope of the Non-PII that would be made personally identifiable and how the Non-PII will be used as a result of the merger."

ValueClick bought CJ now FastClick. The concerns stated in 2000 sound quite "fresh" again today. DoubleClick's activities back then are somewhat similar to VC's today. The individual activities seemed to be harmless, but someone connected the dots and filed the suit that made the FTC jump in.

I almost submit this form to alert Junk Busters about what I believe to be going on.

I decided to wait until the LMI is live 6/23. If I see the new CJ Links updating the FastClick Cookie, I will go and fill out the form. Why?

The collection of Non-PII will turn to Collection of Personally Identifiable Information (PII). All it takes is for the Advertiser to disclose some customer information for the order # tracked by CJ already. Not to CJ of course, that would be a clear issue, transparent to everybody but to ValueClick Media as part of a Advertising Campaign.

Display Advertising is not my specialty, but I believe that Advertisers send Information to VC Media today already. ValueClick has tools for data crunching aimed at improving targeting and conversion or said in single and simple word: profit.

I have to learn more about VC Services, especially the new behavioral product launched this April. Jeff Molander blogged about this at ReveNews.com.

I am not exactly a privacy advocate. It just happened that multiple things got my attention which were all related to this.

It started with Problems that Google Analytics got in Germany. The Product violates German Privacy Laws making it virtually illegal for German Webmasters to use. The Leading German Computer Magazine "C't" covered this in detail. It Explained the technology in detail and it's conflicts with German Laws.

Then CJ came along with their LMI which will create a lot of work for me as publisher. I wanted to know "why" it is necessary to spend so much time (I do not have) on something that made no sense to me. All reasons provided by CJ raised even more questions and raised my suspicion of a "hidden Agenda".

I honestly hope to be proven wrong. May it be because I got it all figured wrong in the first place or because ValueClick reevaluated the problem and decides not to proceed with it.

Labels:

Petition against CJ LMI

I forgot to post about the Petition against Commission Junctions Link Management Initiative.

I believe it was actually good that I post about it separately, because it would have gone lost in my very long post.

Scott Jangro started the Petition and almost 150 people signed and commented it by now already.

I encourage every Commission Junction Affiliate that sees this post to sign the Petition, because it will be in your own best interest.

Link to CJ-Petition against CJ's LMI

The changes are very slim, that CJ will change their plans back, but at least will they know what affiliates are thinking about it.

It also sends a message to the Merchants at CJ who should have an interest in keeping Affiliates in general and also keeping them busy promoting their products rather than updating and re-programming all their Websites.

There might be a tiny chance to convince CJ to re-think their initiative , if Merchants and Affiliates let hear their voices together and say: NO-LMI!

Labels:

CJ Analytics Redux

It has been almost 2 Weeks now since Commission Junction announced on 5/23/2006 their LMI P1 or Link Management Initiative Phase 1 (CJ Account required).

It caused quite an uproar in the Affiliate Marketing Community and a lot of debate and speculation. There are still 2 more weeks before Phase I gets actually launched on 6/23, but a lot of stuff did happen already which made me decide to write a summary and my opinion why CJ is doing this.

I will be proven wrong or right in the months to come. In either case, it will be an interesting time and there is a lot of pain to come. The overall effects of that can not be estimated, but no matter how it develops, it will have a lasting effect for the years to come.

The CJ stated "The Link Management Initiative (LMI) was conceived in response to requests from our employees, advertisers and publishers" ("our (CJ) employees"? Is this a typo? shouldn't it be spelled employer?). I guess this statement was not entirely correct because people had a hard time to find publishers or advertisers that applauded the announcement as something they were looking for and wanted to have.


Sudden Impact
The strongest and loudest criticism and rant came from the CJ Publishers (Affiliates) , because they are affected the most by CJ's announcement.

It was not all just screaming and yelling which a lot of marketing professionals consider a common trait of especially smaller publishers, when it comes to changes in this industry. Scott Jangro, a former BeFree Employee who changed sides and became an Affiliate some years ago was the first who posted some constructive concerns and useful information regarding the issue at his blog.

It was not for long that it was picked up by ThreadWatch.com where I learned about it. I commented at Scott's Blog and wrote about 1 day later a more detailed post at my own blog. My post was quite sarcastic, because I CJ and me have some history together, but also contained technical concerns and speculations about the reason of CJ for this move.

Jeremy Palmer from ReveNews was also one of early Blogger about this topic. His post was simply news correspondence.

He provided a summary of the CJ's Publisher FAQ that is only accessible to CJ Members to people who had no access to it. His only comment was, that CJ is probably doing this to detect and eliminate "rogue" affiliates from their network. Jeremy, The current links provide CJ already enough access to Information about Publisher activities to detect rogue affiliates. They will not catch more because of the LMI, except the ones that turn involuntarily rogue due to the change.

Also the following Bloggers commented on the issue:
SuperAff Affiliate Marketing Blog 5/26 - Crazy Days Are Upon Us - CJ’s New Javascript Delight
Adventures in Net Marketing: on 5/26 - CJ's Javascript Links
David Lewis from ReveNews on 5/27 - CJ's Link Management Initiative: Chill Out, People!

Just a recap for everybody who does not know what CJ's LMI is all about.
CJ switches the content links that are today normal HTML Text Links or Links and Banner Images to "Google Adsense Like" pieces of JavaScript Code which the publisher inserts into his Website.

The change will be launched on 6/23 and will in Phase one only affect new Affiliate Relationships. Existing Relationships will not be affected in June. The Existing Text and Banner Links remain active as so called "Legacy Links".

CJ plans to support the legacy links at least until January 2007 and later to avoid negative impact during the holiday season which is crucial to Advertisers and Publishers alike.

Product Datafeed Links as they are today can not be replaced by JavaScript, but CJ plans to make some changes to the Product Catalog during the next months as well. Special Non-JavaScript will be provided to be used for email marketing or Search Engine Marketing where JavaScript Links are also not usable.

The Email and Search Marketing Links are only enabled for publishers that are identifying themselves as such. If no Special Link for SEM or EM was provided by the Advertiser, then it means, that the Advertiser does not allow it's affiliates to utilize those advertising methods to promote the Advertiser and his products and services. CJ said, that they are going to closely monitor the usage of the links to make sure that publisher are only using them according to each purpose.

The Issue caused by this are very complicated and not easy to understand by a lot of people. Multiple things are affected by this at ones.

Due to the lag of information was there also plenty of room for speculations. Commission Junction had to step forward and answer the most important questions that started piling up.

Advertiser Reaction and Theories
Advertisers (Merchants) were for the most part surprised too. Some started expression their opinion recently in forums, via email and via Tele Conference with Jeff Molander (Summary/Blog Post and Full Audio Download). Jeff Molander was one of the first to comment on CJ's announcement and believes that CJ's LMI has the purpose to "regain control" over the affiliates who are doing only PPC Marketing for the most part anyway.

PPC Marketing was embraced by Affiliates years ago and made Google what Google is today and filled the cash register of Yahoo! by spending billions of advertising dollars on the Yahoo Search Marketing Service which is basically Overture.com. Yahoo! purchased Overture.com formerly known as Goto.com, the PPC Search Engine Pioneer in October 2003.

Merchants got a handle on PPC Marketing themselves since only 1-2 years ago and were surprised that Affiliates occupied this space for years already. Partners turned to competitors in some cases. Jeff has a point that is hard to ignore, but I do not believe that this is the main reason for CJ to change it's linking technique. I will get back to this a bit later again.

Affiliate Marketing Industry Leaders and Spokes Persons Hold Back
There were discussions going on at the various Leading Industry Forums and Blogs. Questions were collected to be addressed by CJ away from the noise..

Scott Jangro provided some good points in his follow up post to his initial comments at his blog, Linda Buquet:aka "Catalyst" from 5 Star Affiliate Programs joined the discussion and the new rising Affiliate Network from Canada, ShareResults.com was the only Network that was taking active part in the discussion. The other networks remained quite, but they also have no blog to join the discussion with.

Wayne Portner from ReveNews provided his opinion to some of the questions and concerns raised by Affiliates and Shawn Collins from AffiliateTip and Affiliate Summit cited Scott Jangro at his blog, who summarized the current debates properly when it reached the peak of the speculations and "conspiracy theories".

I had some interesting discussions in public and private at the Affiliate Manager Forums which pointed me into a direction to look for answers which remained completely unnoticed until this point.

CJU Online Podcast - Addressing the concern regarding CJ's LMI
CJ announced a special Podcast for Tuesday 5/30. The created the new CJU Online Podcast Series for this occasion, but plan to continue it in the future as tool to provide Network related Information to their publishers.

Host of the podcast was Brian Caldwell (Commission Junction) who is also the Host of the Radio Show "Affiliate Marketing Today" at WebmasterRadio.FM. His Guest for this special transmission was Frank Gerstenberger, Director of Product Management at CJ.

The people that badmouthed before the transmission that it will be a waste of time seemed to be right, the statements made were ridicules. It was good enough to fool the people that don't have much industry Background and no technical knowledge.

The first comment from Frank regarding the JavaScript Link was the comparison with Google Adsense. AdSense uses JavaScript and that's were the similarities between Adsense Ads and the new CJ JavaScript links/ad's end.

It's like Google AdSense ... Huh?
AdSense is contextual advertising. Google tries to figure out which ads would be the most relevant for visitors to my page where I inserted the Ad. They are doing a decent job although I still see more Blog Ads on my Blog than anything else. I don't blog much about blogs and the lag of targeting bothers me a bit.

The point is, that I can not choose the Ads myself. I can't control the Advertised Products and Services and the Ad Copy. I can block certain Advertisers and Advertisers can do campaigns that target my site visitors specifically, if I provide this option to Advertisers. I get in the first case money from Google for every click and the for the impressions in the ladder scenario. My Site is nothing than a virtual Billboard that I hand over to Google to take care of and make them and me good money. This is not Performance Marketing or Affiliate Marketing.

If I enable space on my car for Advertisement and get paid by the Agency for every mile I drive with an advertisement they put on my car thorough the city, then does this not make me an Affiliate Marketer. I am not part of the sales process and have virtually no control over it.
It is funny that CJ mentioned AdSense first (and only) and I will explain a bit later why that is.

Along with the Industry
The next statement was, that CJ is just going along with the Industry, other Networks do already use JavaScript Links or plan to do so in the near Future.

Let's see, Linkshare has the optional DRM - Dynamic Rich Media Ad's available for over 4 years now (if not longer). The same is true for beFree dynamic Ads and for CJ's SmartLinks. Each of those aged features has their practical uses, but they are not a replacement for deliberately placed Text or Banner Links.

The argument how great the JS Links will work to ensure that content is up-to-date is also not as revolutionary as it sounds. Merchants provide today already Banners that change automatically. Dynamic update is good in some places and in others not. It's very often the case, that I don't want it to change.

What good does it, if I promote a nice vacation package for Greece and promote a Travel Guide for Greece right next to it, if the merchant changes it to a Travel Guide for Mexico without my knowledge.

But if the Links don't change, why use JavaScript in the first place? JavaScript as Technology has disadvantages over static HTML (or dynamically server side rendered HTML for that matter).

JavaScript pose a security threat, a major one. Not so long ago was the general recommendation to disable JavaScript and cookies completely in your web browser. cookies for the wrong reasons, but JavaScript for very good ones. A lot of security holes were patched (IE), but IE7 is looming already on the horizon.

Performance is another issue. JavaScript is executed on the clients machine. It's using up Memory and CPU power and that not just a little. The notorious memory leaks of IE and Firefox add to the problem. After intense internet usage with 3-5 browser windows are 200-300 MB occupied by the Browser.

Did you ever try to use all the nice feature of Google Personalized Homepage? I did. After adding all the stuff I wanted, about 2-3 pages full of stuff, did my computer spend 15 seconds to 3 minutes to update the content on my page. I removed most of the stuff and kept the minimum to make it somewhat worthwhile to use it and it still loads way to long.

Needless to say, it never became my Homepage. The JavaScript Ads are more likely not to be loaded. If you have a few on a page it can cause problems for the visitor. The nasty thing is, that I can not stop the loading and running of the JavaScript as I can stop the loading of a large HTML Page with a lot of images. Hitting Escape does not stop anything, on the contrary, you just increased your chances, that the whole Browser crashes. Frequent experiences like that will certainly help with customer retention, doesn't it?

See AM:NOT
Future Proof Technology as Frank Gerstenberger said? That remains to be seen. The ability to load Multimedia Ads is an ability that justifies the use of this technology. Support it, great, that does not require to replace the existing one that works better in most other cases.

Going "Along with the industry"... Which Industry? Affiliate Marketing? Did I miss something or did he just confused Affiliate Marketing with Display Advertising?

Is CJ going along with the Ad Space Inventory Buying, Selling, Renting and Managing Display Advertising Industry? Absolutely. Does it make sense, sure.

All this makes one believe, that the Performance Marketing Executives at CJ got either fired or silenced by the Parent Company ValueClick. ValueClick is a leader when it comes to display advertising.

The Sites that provide the Ad Space are content sites that want to monetize their Free content which they were not able to sell successfully (Newspapers for example). Those sites are not actively promoting or selling the services and products advertised on their Website.

It's managed by companies like ValueClick Media , FastClick (now also ValueClick), Adverting and others. The Ads have to be appropriate and targeted as possible, that's marketing 101.

Dynamic Rich Media Content does good on a lot of those sites It was booming in 2003 after years of slow growing and almost certain death during the DOT Com crash.-See "The Evolution of Rich Media" at iMedia Connections, written by Russell Shaw 1/2004

It started booming even more since last year. The 2005 eMarketer report "Rich Media -- At the Tipping Point" revealed that consumers are more likely to purchase a product after viewing a rich-media ad than a non-rich media ad.

The provided link goes to a form at the eMarketers Website. They send you the Whitepaper for Free, if you fill it out. If you don't want to fill out their form and provide all your personal information, download it directly here.while its still there.

I found it in Google next to the link to File on another site where it was already removed.

Affiliate Marketing does not work that way. Affiliates don't want to rent Ad-Space to somebody to manage it, at least not to make it their primary source of income. No Affiliates are active sellers and promoter of specific merchants and their products they have a relationship with.
That's the reason why Affiliate Content Site are so rare when you look at the total number of Affiliates out there. There are two types of affiliate content sites.

The first type are affiliates that did not start out as affiliates. They had a content site and realized, that they can and should monetize it. Those Affiliates are not marketers. They don't want to sell and promote your product and think up ways how to increase sales. They care about their site and want the money to pay for it and make a living. Those are sites that are better off with Google AdSense and if they are large enough with a lot of traffic, companies like ValueClick Media will be interested to manage Ad-Space on their Site.

What is Affiliate Marketing?
The Second Type of content site started with thinking about promoting and selling the merchants products first and build the content around that to increase sales.

Affiliates are into it to make their living via selling somebody else's products or services and getting compensated for it. The better they do that job, the more commission they make.

Smart affiliates are the first to exploit new trends and developments. Most areas are way to risky for an established merchant to explore.

Many Affiliates fail for exactly that reason. Others will find a way and strike it rich. When this frontier becomes at one point in time urban suburbs, Advertisers like to forget, that it became a suburb because of the frontier work of Affiliates and other Entrepreneurs' that risked everything and proved what works and what does not work.

They become suddenly unwanted and are being forced with brute force to leave the new backyard of the business establishment. They are seen as intruders and scrapers and maggots. Does this description sound familiar? There was something in the history books about that. mmhh.

Trying to make sense
I want to believe, that it is not ValueClick's Goal to make Display/Content Advertisers out of all the Affiliates at CJ, take over our sites and display our site visitors fancy Rich Media Ads and we stand watching it without being able to do a damn thing about it.

Now after all this Text are we back to square one. Everything so far shows that there are more disadvantages than advantages to switch to JavaScript. Control? Heck no. If they want Affiliates to do Affiliate Marketing, they better not.

Avoid that affiliates do PPC Advertising or have a customer that subscribes to your RSS Feed at Technorati via an Aggregator that converts your Feed to an Email and then clicks on it and get you canned? Hell no! They don't need JavaScript Links to track that. They can track that today. They can track a lot more about what else goes on your website. Stuff that isn't their business.

That Idea gave the title for my original blog post "Are you ready for Google Analytics?"

Sudden Clarity
I am convinced today, that this was not CJ's intent and I hope that I did not gave them some wrong Ideas for the future. But the "tracking" Idea does not seem to be completely off. It's not the same "Stadium", but at least the same "Ball Game".

This was what hit me last week, when Wayne Porter from ReveNews pointed me to the Article "Q&A with ValueClick's General Manager David Yovanno" by Brad Berens at iMedia Connections from 5/18/2006.

They are primarily talking about the state of the (display advertising) industry and the merger with Fastclick. The Article is 5 Pages long and gets really interesting on the last page. Just reading the last page would not have triggered something. It was the whole article that led to the last page.

It made me check further and I did not like what I found. Nothing secret, but something I never spend to much time on to think about it.Since I do not want make any false allegations and get me into potential trouble, am I going to stop here and just say this.

When the new Links get launched, start watching your cookies. If you notice a FastClick.com and/or ValueClick.com on your computer (changes are very good, that you have one today without knowing), check if it changes when you browse your own Website that has new CJ Links on it.

If it changes, bingo.

I will post what I believe (my concerns) then, if I am right. It would be back to square one if I am wrong.

What I am thinking justifies all this crap that goes on today. The some gains for other things is a side affect which could have been done much better. The drawbacks are nothing compared to the potential gain, for ValueClick of course, not the affiliates.

Gee.. this post got long. I will write about what my thoughts are on the practical ramifications, especially for my Websites in a different post.

I planned to blog earlier and should have to break this one up into multiple posts. The gramar is probably very poor. It got very late and I just did a quick spell check. Forgive me the errors, english is my second language afterall. ;).

Labels:

Are you ready for '' CJ Analytics''?


I didn't see the simple kept email from Commission Junction which was sent on Tuesday night at first. It looked not important in the bulk of emails in my Inbox on Wednesday morning. I saw the announcement first at thread watch. The Threadwatch Post refers to Jeff Molander's view on the topic and to Scott's Jangro's Blog Post which was very good in pointing out some of the major issues with CJ's idea. I decided to leave a long comment there and showed even more problems with CJ's plan to replace regular URL links with AdSense-Like or Google Analytics-Like JavaScript code. This post does repeat some of my comments, but from a slight different perspective. I also refer to statements made there a couple times without repeating them here.

I recommend to read all the posts and comments and also check the hundreds of posts at the ABestWeb Marketing Forum and of course the source of all this trouble, CJ's email announcement of their Link Management Initative (you do require a CJ Advertiser or Publisher Account for access).

The Plan
The CJ JavaScript Ad's can not be used in all cases. The option to get a different URL for email and another for PPC Advertising and another for product feeds is not going to work in all real-world scenarios either
It will get really ugly, if CJ is going to disable referrer tracking for a link that was created for one purpose, but is being used for a different one by the publisher.

Here is a real-live Example of the problems. Our Shopping Portal Site is a perfect example of all the things that are not going to work or at least not going to work well/better than existing Text or Banner Ads.

We have pretty much all of our content in a Database (MS SQL Server) and a custom CMS solution to update our Website content. The content is displayed on our Websites, but it is also being syndicated via RSS feeds, and pepped up by Feedburner.

Ever heart about Syndication and Aggregation?
If you are familiar with Feedburner, you will know that their "Smart feeds" can be used in a lot of different ways. They can be browsed like a website, imported into Blog/RSS Directories and Search Engines and of course being aggregated by all kinds of readers and services such as Feedblitz.com which aggregates RSS feeds and sends the aggregated content conveniently via email to their customers. We use the professional cobranding feature of Feedblitz for our Email Deals Alerts Feature Now add Google Co-Op to the mix to make the biggest organic and PPC search engine part of the dilemma.

Based on CJ's definition would I require at least 3 different links for the same content. JavaScript Links for our Website, the Feedburner Feed "Site" and Web based RSS Readers such as Google Reader, Bloglines or My Yahoo!.

When it gets aggregated by Feedblitz, Newsgator or similar RSS via Email Services the Email Link should be used because the user is clicking from his email client. There is virtually no difference to any other email newsletter you would send to the user, if he would be one of your opt-in email newsletter subscriber.

When used for Blog/RSS Search engines or special Services like Google Personalized an Google Co-Op, the Search Engine Link must be used, especially for Google Co-Op which behaves just like PPC ad's with the difference that the User subscribed to your content and wants to get your Ads/Content displayed for matching keywords.

Unless CJ develops a self reconfiguring link or link morph system that changes form, structure and content depending on its current use. The whole Web 2.0 thing seems to be something that stopped for CJ at AJAX, ignoring the fact that everything is working on breaking down the barriers between the different content delivery methods and technologies to give the user the personal choice to get the content he wants, when he wants it and in the format/way he wants it. This is totally conflicting CJ's approach with their JS Links.

I wrote in detail what other ramification this change would have for our Website, ignoring RSS Feeds, Blogs, XML etc. In short, to make it work for us, a complete re-write of our CMS System, Public Site, Tracking and Reporting would be required. The partial recreation of all our content would also be necessary. Everything we built during the last 5 1/2 years would be affected, except our "new" Blogger Blog.

Are you ready for "CJ Analytics"?
I am also not sure, if I want to have interactive AJAX powered JavaScript Code from CJ on virtually all pages of my Website. CJ would get full control and complete access to everything that makes our Website a Website. I am not sure, if I am willing to entrust CJ all this highly sensible data. It is the same problem as with Google Analytics, which we are using today.

I still have a strange feeling, when I think about the data Google collects, but Google is at least much less likely to take advantage of the data and use it against us or boot us out of a lucrative business by adapting our secret tricks and techniques.

I am not so sure about that when it comes to CJ. What is tracked? Who has access to the Data. With Google analytics are we at least getting some very comprehensive statistics and analytics tools in exchange for the access to the data. I don't think that CJ will make SEO and SEM and Funnel, Goals, Drop out and Conversion data which I am sure CJ will collect to a certain extend freely available to the publisher. You probably also remember the issue from earlier this year, when CJ Employees with access to sensible and very profitable publisher information and data turned affiliate and left the network. And they had only access to the very limited amount of data available back then. With the JS Code on publisher sites will CJ be able to see and know and track everything as good or even better than the Website owner himself.

Conclusion.
Dynamic JavaScript Ads are nice and a valuable ADD-ON to the existing linking methods currently provided to the publishers. Unless CJ Changed their business model to become a Blog Ads or Google AdSense or TextLinkAds, JS Link will not be able to replace a lot of the existing URL Text Links.

Look at Linkshares DRM and Be-Free's dynamic Ads (BestBuy.com has good examples). There you can see very good and useful examples of using JavaScript for specific types of Ads which would not be possible using the classic technologies. We use those DRM's and Dynamic Ads on our Site for some very specific purposes where they do a better job than Image Ads, Text Ads or Text Links.

History tends to repeat itself
That is the right approach. I have still some memories of CJ's change of their product linking and redesign the CJ Marketplace (Product Catalog) at the end of 2002. I made some very detailed comments as along with a lot of other affiliates and merchants which were for the most part very unhappy with CJ's change.

CJ moved forward and ignored most of the feedback which was very specific and not just generic bitching and yelling. CJ's decision resulted for us in the removal of any CJ Product Links from our sites for about 3 years, until we had the necessary hardware to kick around several gigabyte of text data at ones and developed a complete CJ Feed watching, analyzing, pre-processing and updating system.

I have the feeling that CJ will move forward as planned and will start to prepare us as much as possible. This includes looking for CJ Merchant Programs at other Networks, such as Performics which seems to be favored by a lot of merchants. I see a lot that have a program at both networks. It used to be the other way around. We always replaced any other network or even in-house program with CJ's, if it was available. There are only a few exceptions to this rule.

Uncertain Future
This will push a lot of publishers out of CJ and look somewhere else, but I am sure that it will also attract different types of new Affiliates to CJ. I would not be surprised if some contextual Advertisers that use AdSense and Yahoo Publisher Network and similar services today will take notices and might check it out.
Hard to tell if this will be better for CJ in the future or not. I am sure that CJ was thinking about the Data feed Affiliates and will probably launch officially their new Web service for Products.

It will become a feasible replacement option for some types of Data feed affiliates, but certainly not for all. Brook Shaaf and Nate Griffin read my "scrap" about all that stuff via email. I think I need to expedite my content processing and put it at least as "scrap" on my Website, the same way as I did it for the Merchant Datafeeds for Affiliates 101 Scrap. I am sure, that Web services will become mainstream topic probably later this year, but latest beginning of next year.

Closing Words
I hope to be proven wrong, and CJ will change their plans to make the use of JavaScript Link Code optional and continues to provide classic URL Text Links and Images; seriously, but I hoped that to happen in the past too and was unfortunately never proven wrong so far. This post is long enough now. Feel free to leave your comments and thoughts about this.

Labels:

Google issues getting worse and worse

If probably heard in the News or from an internet savvy friend about Google's Big Daddy update and the mounting problems that developed since the update was started at the beginning of February. My business site, the comparison shopping portal ConsumerMatch.com was affected by the Google problems as were hundreds of others. It have been very frustrating months for everybody who got "hit" by this.

The worst thing of all is, that there is nothing we can do about it, but wait and hope that Google gets it's act straight and that everything will be back to normal rather sooner than later.

It started last summer with Google's Big 3 Phase Jagger Update. The goal of Jagger was to detect spam and duplicate content better and cleanse the Google Search Index from millions of pages of junk. The Jagger update caused serious problems for our Websites. We were not the only sites that got problems. A lot of other sites. Google was able to remove a lot of Spam from their Index, but removed together with the Spam a lot of legit and valuable content.

The last months of 2005 were pretty much like a roller coaster ride for us: Added to the Index, Loosing Pages, Removed, Appearing, Growing and the same from the beginning again. To make the story short; our Google traffic during the peak of the holidays was virtually nothing.

Google Engineer Matt Cutts posted on 10/19/2005 at his blog what Webmasters should do, who's websites dropped out of the index. Article: Update Jagger: Contacting Google. I did not see the necessity for us to contact Google regarding our website yet. I started working on possible solutions for the probable Problems of our Website instead.

I believe that the problem with our site was caused by duplicate content. We had at the time multiple websites on multiple domains with similar content. Our old Site Shop-Links.net, which was started in 2001 and our current site ConsumerMatch.com (where we also own the .Net Domain).

Matt Cutts published in December and January posts regarding the changes in Google's logic and what Webmasters should and should not do. To address canonicalization, Webmasters should implement 301 Redirects from the duplicate content to the original version. Also all 302 redirects should be removed from the site since 302 redirects were used by Spammers in the past to avoid an accidental penalty from Google. See:

The Little 301 That Could, 12/21/2005 and discussing 302 redirects, 1/4/2006

Jagger wrapped up by about November 18th 2005 and was the actual logic change. Google was now getting ready for the Bigdaddy infrastructure upgrade which is supposed to work better for canonicalization and redirects.

We had our 301 redirects in place when Bigdaddy started and everything was looking good at the beginning beginning of February and the Webmaster Community was praising the search results returned by the Test Datacenters. Google got ready to push it out to all Datacenters. See post by Danny Sullivan at Search Engine Watch on 2/2/2006: Google Bigdaddy Search Infrastructure To Rollout More Broadly.

The Rollout was performed throughout February and March. One Datacenter after another was upgraded with the new BigDaddy Infrastructure and Bot. In the middle of February did already News appear about unexpected Issues. Known and new Issues are reported until this day and a solution is not in sight.



I collected some News of the previous months, that will give you some pretty good ideas about the issues.

The Register reported today
Full-up Google choking on web spam?
"Webmasters have been seething at Google since it introduced its 'Big Daddy' update in January, the biggest revision to the way its search engine operates for years. Alarm usually accompanies changes to Google's algorithms, as the new rankings can cause websites to be demoted, or disappear entirely. But four months on from the introduction of "Big Daddy," it's clear that the problem is more serious than any previous revision - and it's getting worse."

Zoomzoom Marketeers blogged last Friday
Having problems with Google indexing?
"If you haven't experienced problems with Google dropping the amount of indexed pages on your site, you are certainly one of the lucky ones."

Newcybertech Weblog reported on 4/8/2006
Google Algorithm Problems
"Have you noticed anything different with Google lately? The Webmaster community certainly has, and if recent talk on several search engine optimization (SEO) forums is an indicator, Webmasters are very frustrated"


So far was nothing reported from the Googleplex in California that provides any information and facts to understand what's going on. I don't know if it is so quite because Google Engineers are working on a solution for the problem. I hope that this is the reason for the silence.

Let's hope for the best for everybody. Google's reputation is seriously suffering at the moment because of this.

During the last 2 weeks were a lot of people working overtime on their website for the mentioned reasons. Others were busy investigating the issue in general to determine what the heck happened.



At the same time interesting articles appeared that talked about recent discoveries and developments in search engine behavior and ranking logic.

The logic and visible behavior of the Google Search Engine and it's Crawlers showed some remarkable behavior (positive ones and not related to the BigDaddy Issues). The conclusions made from the observations show a trend in the Search Industry that will have major consequences for a lot of Websites in the future. How near that Future is, is hard do determine at this point.

Anyway, the changes are so severe that what you learned about Text Book Search Engine Optimization (SEO) during the last 10 years might become obsolete very soon.

It started with Mike Grehan's post at ClickZ on 4/17/2006 with the title: Does Textbook SEO Really Work Anymore?. Mike Grehan is a renowned Veteran of the CEO industry and CEO of Smart Interactive Ltd..

This stirred up quite a lot of controversy and responses and eventually caused Mike Grehan to post another follow up article at ClickZ.com on 5/1/2006 with the title: Does Textbook SEO Really Work Anymore?, Redux. The Examples Mike presented about high ranking pages that were not even crawled yet and high ranking pages where the search term can't be found anywhere within the page at all (no, not a cloaked site).

I did realize after finish reading the Articles, that the current Issues because of Jagger and BigDaddy will seem like minor issues for some in the not so distant future, if Mike Grehan is only to 50% right about his predictions.

The last 12 month were already turbulent. It seems that this was only a Taste or Appetizer for the things to come in the next 12 months.

How the Web being called after that? Web 2.1? Web 3.0? Web 3.0 Beta?

I wish sometimes to be a fortune teller. Just to be able to get an answer to some of those questions. Unfortunately I am not, like most other people and simply have to adapt to the new Environment, react to sudden changes and be prepared as much as possible to be able to make the best out of the new situations and resulting opportunities.

Labels:

Google Pages - Fast Lane into Google Search Index?!

The title of this post is not just hype, but a serious question.

Here is what happened.

I wrote and published 5 days ago on 4/24/2006 my article about my experiences and opinions about the current beta of Google's new toy called Google Pages. Link to Full Article: Google Pages Demystified

It is now 4/29/2006, for only 3 hours, because it is right now 3:00 am in the morning here in Fresno/California. I got my usual email from GoogleAlerts.com at around 6:00 pm. GoogleAlerts.com is the commercial version of Google's Free Service with the same name. It has some more features and options that the free version does not have. Anyhow, I use the service to monitor Google Search Results for important things that affect me personally or professionally, such a my Name, Artist Nick Name, Company Name, My Websites etc.

Here is what I looked at and had me read it twice.


The Account is now a bit over a week old and the content (5 Pages) is up for about 5 days now.

The Site is already in Google's index and here it comes: outranking a lot of old sites for the same key-phrase. It ranked #17 and when I checked now in complete disbelieve, was it still #17. The Search Results are for my companies name, VisionOne,Inc. (#24 if you count the indent sub-results). It outranked almost a 100 other websites (our clients for the most part), with an estimated 487,000 Pages indexed by Google.

I am absolutely speechless. This is something for the SEO bloggers to blog about. Too bad that this blog is actually about Text Art and Fun Stuff and not SEO, butI I had to post it somewhere :).

That my Article links to it can't be enough. It was posted on a few good ranking and Google trusted Sites, but that was 2-3 days ago. It was not like a home page feature at CNN or something like that. It was posted to Digg.com late at night 3 days ago and only 5 people dugg it which means that it never saw the light of the day there, not to mention it's homepage.

I sent a link to the article to the Google Pages team as feedback after 2 previous emails with stuff that found its way into the article as well. The pages written are quite personal (some people start eating when they are unhappy about something and I start writing to get my mind busy with something else), hence Pulizer Price worthy content can't be the reason for it either.

The whole thing became an article by accident and had nothing that would "boost" anything it links to. I simply pieced together and partially rewrote the bunch of comments and feedbacks that came together over a span of 2 days while I was playing with Google's new Toy. I decided to make an Article out of it, because I realized, that all this stuff might be of interest for somebody. Anyhow ...

The Point is, that I can not find any plausible reason to explain this. This blog and site is getting slowly Google's attention after constant growth from an one-page Website for some years until last December to about 30-something pages or so during the last 4 months.

I know a thing or two about SEO (without doing it as profession), you can find out more about that on my professional home page, if you like (I have some nice free tools there too ;) ).

Ideas, anybody? I need a little help here.

Labels:

A Great Time at the new Wynn Resort in Las Vegas

A week ago was my birthday and I got spoiled with a free trip to Las Vegas. I was staying for free at the all new and luxurious Wynn Resort and Casino.

I blogged about the reasons for the free stay at the Wynn Resort and Casino at my personal Blog already two weeks before I actually got there.

It was actually a coincidence and had nothing to do with my birthday. It was great timing nevertheless. I had a great time at the Wynn. It was really luxurious. The Service was great and we had a lot of Fun. I was bringing a friend of mine along since the invitation included everything for free for TWO PEOPLE and I am a single and pretty busy at the moment to find time for a girlfriend.

Fancy Dinner at Daniel Boulud French Brasserie
We started with a great dinner a the Daniel Boulud French Brasserie were we got to meet our host and also other the other people that were invited as well. I completely forgot all the entree's because of the main entrée. It was angus beef filet and ribs. I would have never imagined that I would eat a great angus beef filet AFTER the "other" stuff on the plate, but man, the ribs were not from this world. They were cooked and the meat was so tender and juice that a knife was not needed at all, the meat was falling apart, all by itself.

A Fantastic Show: LE RÊVE
After the dinner did we have plenty of time to socialize before we hopped over to the LE RÊVE Theatre which was specially built for their main Show with the name... right ... LE RÊVE (which means "A Dream" in French). LE RÊVE is a Cirque du Soleil like show which should not surprise anybody, because it was created by Franco Dragone the creator and director of shows like Cirque du Soleil's "O", Mystère and Celine Dion A New Day and other Cirque du Soleil productions. He did his own "thing" with LE RÊVE, that's the reason why it is not officially titled "Cirque du Soleil's LE RÊVE".

The Show was fantastic and more than I expected (and I expected a lot considering the creator's reputation).

The Music was fantastic (I bought the CD :) ) and the acrobatics' breath taking.

I could not get the thought out of my head "no disability insurance is going to cover those guys and girls".

I have a picture from before the show actually started. It's showing the inside of the theatre (no pictures allowed during the show). There is a short Video Clip (with music) available here. Go check it out (you must scroll down a bit to see it).

A Massage at midnight? Golf in the City?
After a good night sleep did we meet with our Host again and they showed us the property. Everything is very nice. The Suites have a bathroom that is bigger than my living room and every single one of them has a separate room, just for massages (with massage service available 24/7). We also got a glimpse at the Golf Course, the only one right at the Las Vegas Strip, which is in the middle of the city. I guess that's were the saying "Only in Vegas" derived from hehe.

Avenue Q
We watched the other Show that night which was actually a musician with the Name Avenue Q. It was not bad, but I am personally not such a big fan of Musicals anyway.

Ferrari ... yeah baby
We also seized the opportunity to check out the only Ferrari/Maserati Dealership in Nevada which is located in the Hotel also. They had one of the few "Enzo" Ferrari's there (estimated value 2.5 Million!!! dollar) which I was not able to photograph. I was able to "steal" a picture of a nice but used Lamborghini with my camera phone. "No Pictures" did I hear a voice from behind me. Well better one picture than none.

We also gambled a bit and flew the next day back to Fresno after a good lunch at the Paris Hotel and Casino (I was showing my friend a bit (else) of Vegas since I have been there already a couple times.

Okay, here are the pictures.

Wynn Hotel

Wynn

Le Reve Theatre right before Show Start

Wynn

My future car :)

Wynn

Labels: ,

My personal Virtual Trade Show Experience

This post is a bit business related. It has to with my Internet Marketing activities. Anyhow, the reason is a different one.

I like to describe my experiences and the look and feel with my first Virtual Trade Show / Expo I ever attended. It's the eComXpo The Virtual Tradeshow for eCommerce Marketers happening completely virtual in cyberspace since April 4th until today April 6th.

If you get a chance, check it out yourself. Admission is free for visitors.

What amazed me what the general presentation when you are in the Virtual Exhibit Halls which give you the actual feeling of a busy and crowded Exhibit Hall in the real world, such as Affiliate Summit. The Noise, the look. You have virtual Booth's of Exhibitors you can visit. Chat with people at the booth or other attendees that are "walking around" on the Exhibit Floor. You can collect Documents and add them to your virtual Briefcase, exchange Virtual Business Cards, the whole deal you would get from a real world expo, but without the need to travel, booking flights and hotel rooms and the other costly expenses you get automatically when it is a show at a physical location which requires to attend physically.

In this case can you enter the Expo without wearing a uncomfortable suit. A pajama will do just fine. you also don't have to walk and spent the time to find the booths of presenters or people you know who are just a visitor as you are. It's tough to find them at a real world Expo. Here you simply Browse or search the list of attendees and exhibitors and voila. You can even add them to your "buddy" list and see if they are currently online or not and "where" they are at the moment.

There are different "Halls" for the different Industries and Shows within the Show plus an Educational Center with real-time presentations, streamed conveniently to your home with Q and A afterwards, giving you the ability to ask the Speaker questions. If you pay for the access to the "eComXpo University" you can access all past presentations (which are recorded) whenever you saw them already or the ones you missed, even presentations from the previous years. I paid the less than $50 dollars for that feature which is really a bargain.


The Technology used for the Virtual Expo is a mix of DHTML, Flash and Web 2.0 Technology. Really awesome. I hope that this kind of technology will be used for a lot more Expos in the Future and not just Internet Marketing.

Btw. If you have a Website or Blog, private, club or business, you should check it out. You are missing out on important stuff, if you don't. You can monetize even your personal sites. That will probably not male you rich, but pays maybe the cost of the site. You should not do intrusive advertising and plaster your site with banners etc.Never forget why you created your site in the first place. Certainly not to be a virtual bilboard. Have a look at my blog here for example. It has various Ad's using Google Adsense, Chitika and Amazon.com. I used the same for my Roy/SAC Text Artist Homepage.

Cheers,
Carsten a.k.a. Roy/SAC

Labels: , ,

I am getting spoiled on my Birthday

In a few weeks is my birthday coming up. I did not plan anything special, may be dinner with some friends and some drinks in my favorite bar here in Fresno, that's it.

Well, It happened by coincidence, that I got this week an Invitation to the Wynn Resort and Casino in Las Vegas. This has to do with my Internet Project ConsumerMatch.com.




Wynn decided to invite their Affiliates to "get the full experience of staying at the hotel as a guest". Hey, who says NO to that. The "Wynn Famtour" will be from April 12 to April 14. April 14th is my birthday.

The Tour includes a two 2 nights stay at the Hotel, for FREE. A complimentary Dinner at their famous Daniel Boulud French Brasserie, a free Dinner at their Bufet and Free Tickets to their famous new Shows Avenue Q and Le Reve. Don't be jealous, this does not happen all the time. The trip to Vegas is not paid though, but that's not the problem, because I live in Fresno/CA which is not too far away. I just use 25,000 of my Bonus Miles and voila, flight is taken care of as well. My business partner can not come so I invited a friend who supports me a lot to come along instead. Another 25,000 for a second plane ticket and a call to Wynn and everything was taken care of.

Don't get it wrong, It will not all be fun. We will spend some hours during the day with their Marketing staff to get to know the property better and discuss ways how we as Affiliate can help to promote their new Resort which just opened last year. I think this idea to invite us to get a good Idea what we are promoting on our sites, search engnes and ezines is a very good idea. I am probably not the only one who is already writing about this give away which is in fact already good marketing for Wynn. A win win situation and fun for everybody. Not bad. I wish this would happen more often.

I will blog about my experience when I come back.

Labels: ,

Blogs, Blogging, XML, ATOM, RSS explained in simple Words.

I spent the last days several hours on a very comprehensive post about Blogs, XML, ATOM, RSS, Readers and Syndication / Aggregation, basically about the whole thing that is related to every day Web Feeds (more or less).

It's the serious attempt to explain the whole thing to normal people who use the internet, but don't know and don't care how the things work on a technical level in the background.

The trigger for me to write the Article was the request of a Business Partner to explain to him what all this is. He did not understand what posting in a "Blog" makes it different than posting a News via a proprietary CMS tool on one of our Websites.

I think he gets it now. I hope you too.

Here is the Link to the Article: ConsumerMatch.com Blog: Blog, Atom, RSS, XML and Syndication/Aggregation ! ?

Don't be shy to comment it. Positve or Negative.
Thanks

Carsten Cumbrowski a.k.a. Roy/SAC

Labels: , ,

RoboForm 10% off with code CORTS